Friday, October 4, 2013

Re: [IAC#RG] Fwd: WARREN BUFFET HIRES SONIA GANDHI’S SON-IN-LAW

I Do not Think that Rabeert needs to hire "Americans" to manage his Investments . These people are Transparent. Our own " Indians" are more Opaque . Loyal to Family , honest to Core , except less and can be satisfied with less .
There fore Like his MIL he seeks such people 

 
N vikramsimha , KRIA Katte , #12 Sumeru Sir M N Krishna Rao Road , Basvangudi < Bangalore 560004.

From: Kanan Jaswal <kananvj@gmail.com>
To: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Sent: Wednesday, 2 October 2013 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Fwd: WARREN BUFFET HIRES SONIA GANDHI'S SON-IN-LAW

I am afraid your information is not correct! What I hear is that it is the other way round, it is actually Raaabert who is going to hire Warren to manage his investments all over the country and across the world!

Kanan Jaswal


On 1 October 2013 21:25, B S Bakshi <billbakshi@gmail.com> wrote:
Bill.

 
BUFFET HIRES SONIA GANDHI'S SON-IN-LAW


 





 

 
<
WARREN BUFFET HIRES SONIA GANDHI'S SON-IN-LAW



In news that has relieved lovers of money everywhere, legendary
investment guru Warren Buffet has announced that the search for his successor is finally over. New Delhi-based entrepreneur Robert Vadra, son-in-law of Indian Supremo Sonia Gandhi, will soon be taking over as head of Berkshire Hathaway.

"Despite an extremely rigorous gym schedule, this extraordinary young man has become a billionaire in just four years," said the Sage of Omaha. "Not only did he convince real estate giant DLF to give him an entire suburb of Delhi at throwaway prices, he also got them to lend him the money, interest free. My sources inform me that he is also acquiring two or three other Indian states, but he's too modest to talk about these things."

Members of Sonia Gandhi's domestic staff have welcomed the move.

"I kiss his boots on a regular basis," said Law Minister Salman
Khurshid, "It's amazing how smooth he keeps the leather."

"He's extremely dynamic," said baggage-handler Manish Tewari. "When I carry his bags at the airport, I can barely keep up. And it's not just because he doesn't have to go through security."

DLF has rubbished allegations of corruption, and maintains that all
dealings have been completely transparent.

"We did everything very openly," said a spokesperson for DLF. "There is no question of favouritism. We are committed to providing the same benefits to anyone who marries Priyanka Gandhi."

Others have also earmarked Vadra for international glory.

"Let me just get through this Syrian problem," said US President Barack Obama. " I'm going to use this man's help to revive the US
economy."







Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Posted by at No comments:

Re: [IAC#RG] OVERSTRESSED LITIGANT COLLAPSES IN THE BOMBAY HIGH COURT.

This is the visible decease in our country ,, but no body wants to discus at length. if u tried to find out reasoning for such delay u will reach to conclusion that our governing system is based upon some outdated principles which  without any basis and support of logic or reasoning ,, unless and until u  fight for change in the existing system nothing will work ,, I hope various sectors are slowly recognizing this fact .....  


On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Forum for Fast Justice <fastjustice@gmail.com> wrote:


OVERSTRESSED LITIGANT COLLAPSES IN THE BOMBAY HIGH COURT.

MY 16 YRS OLD PIL HEARD FIRST TIME: TERMED IRRELEVANT NOW AND DISPOSED OF.


It was Friday 3-30 P.M. 27th Sept. 2013.


Bench : Justice Dhananjay Chandrachud and Justice M.S.Sonak.


I was waiting for my matter to reach for hearing and a big thud was heard from the chair just behind me. The full court room rose on its feet and looked behind. Judges got up and came down.


What happended?


A man collapsed with his chair upside down. Judges left for a while to their chambers. People around turned to help. Doctor was summoned from High Court clinic. Registrar General was standing tense. Patient was in coma. It took 20 minutes for the doctor to bring him back to the senses. Judges came to soothe him. He was crying with folded hands before the judges in prayer posture who couldn't assure him when his matter would be heard. They appeared helpless. Judges went out for few minutes and resumed work again. Meanwhile I asked the unfortunate litigant: 'Since How many years are you fighting you case?' 'six years' replied the man still crying while being taken out.


Immediately thereafter my PIL No. 902 of 1998 reached and I started argument. I was interrupted by the bench stating that my PIL on the irregularities and corruption in junior college admissions was based on 1997 GR (Government Resolution) and subsequently several judgements of the Supreme Court were pronounced on the subject, hence my PIL couldn't be entertained.


I was appearing in person and said that I could argue the matter in lieu of those judgements and justify every contents and prayers in the petition and prepared to take the utmost risk even at the cost of its dismissal. I said I was not at fault in delay of 16 long years! But the judges prevailed on their stand and 'allowed' me to file another PIL! I argued in vain that it involved lot of reworking and receiving info. through RTI and waiting for days and days for the information to be received. Judges said, they couldn't help. I further submitted that during last 16 years I would have urged hundred times to all Chief Justices to hear this PIL but in vain.


My heart cried from within for not geting justice to the poor and merited students but judiciary as usual stood insensitive.


If this is the fate of the Public Interest Litigations what about private and government litigations pending since 20-30 years in almost all courts across the country?


WILL INDIAN CITIZENRY RISE IN REVOLT?


(Bhagvanji Raiyani)

Chairman & Managing Trustee

Forum For Fast Justice

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



--
http://freedomteam.in/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/ftilogo-new-300x183.jpg
P. Sureshan,
Advocate-on-record, Supreme Court Of India, 
NLC( India ) Law Office
No. 90, Second Floor , Bank Enclave , Laxmi Nagar, Delhi-92..... Ph: 9818083219,8802797432,01132081075 
Posted by at No comments:

[HumJanenge] Fwd: The RTI Amendment Bill 2013

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Veeresh Malik <veereshmalik@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 5:26 PM
Subject: Fwd: The RTI Amendment Bill 2013
To: rs-cpers@sansad.nic.in, sahoo.ak@sansad.nic.in
Cc: shantaramgoa@gmail.com, sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>, Veeresh Malik <veereshmalik@gmail.com>

To:
The Joint Secretary PPG
RAJYA SABHA

4-October-2013

Jai Hind & Good Evening!!
Please find attached the memorandum submitted on behalf of the
"National Campaign for Political Reform in India"  concerning the subject Bill for consideration by the sub-Committee in response to the public notice dated 21.09.2013..
yours faithfully
Veeresh Malik
Coordinator - NCPRI

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "HumJanenge Forum People's Right to Information, RTI Act 2005" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to HumJanenge+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Posted by at No comments:

[rti4empowerment] Fwd: The RTI Amendment Bill 2013

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Veeresh Malik <veereshmalik@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 5:26 PM
Subject: Fwd: The RTI Amendment Bill 2013
To: rs-cpers@sansad.nic.in, sahoo.ak@sansad.nic.in
Cc: shantaramgoa@gmail.com, sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>, Veeresh Malik <veereshmalik@gmail.com>

To:
The Joint Secretary PPG
RAJYA SABHA

4-October-2013

Jai Hind & Good Evening!!
Please find attached the memorandum submitted on behalf of the
"National Campaign for Political Reform in India"  concerning the subject Bill for consideration by the sub-Committee in response to the public notice dated 21.09.2013..
yours faithfully
Veeresh Malik
Coordinator - NCPRI

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "INDIA RTI for empowerment" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rti4empowerment+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Posted by at No comments:

Re: [IAC#RG] WILL MANMOHAN SINGH RESIGN NOW ?

Dear Ali,
 
With the outcry from the public, the  Gandhi family realised the rejection of the bill by the President was imminent and in the nick of time, all this gimmicks enacted....isn't it?
 
Capt Kutty
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2013 8:28 AM
Subject: RE: [IAC#RG] WILL MANMOHAN SINGH RESIGN NOW ?

It is time to consider  the consequences   lifting a person on to a pedestal for  which he is not suitable. Rahul's behavior is also erratic, like Nero played the fiddle when Rome was burning.
Tcg

Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 15:17:19 +0530
From: chaddask@gmail.com
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] WILL MANMOHAN SINGH RESIGN NOW ?

 
Dear Venkataraman,

       There are more than one reasons for Manmohan Singh NOT TO REACT.
 
1.    He is inert and normally does not react.
 
2.    The Mom has served the Prime Ministership on a paltter, how & why should he react to her son's bullies.
 
3.     He has to prove his 100% loyality to the Family.  
 
4.     Can anyone think that Manmohan Singh can forward the ordinance on his own (that too going against SC). This was a calculated move (Tabling the ordinance and then snubbing the PM).
 
5.      Any respectable PM who becomes PM on his own merits would have / should have resigned. Here the scenario is different.
 
          There are so many reasons for him NOT TO REACT. One could write a thesis on the subject.  
SK Chadda
 
 
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Venkatraman Ns <nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com> wrote:
 To
India Against Corruption


                                     WILL  MANMOHAN SINGH  RESIGN  NOW  ?


Rahul Gandhi has termed  the ordinance  to undo the Supreme court verdict on convicted persons from sitting in assemblies and parliament  as nonsense and said it should be thrown away.
While , by this statement Rahul Gandhi has tried to improve his public image , what about the public image of Manmohan Singh?  When the Vice President of the leading party in the UPA  makes  such strong  statement in public , Manmohan Singh has to react.
The option for him  is either to defend his decision to issue an ordinance  or  submit his resignation protesting against  the outburst of Rahul Gandhi in public .
At the fag end of UPA II  facing all round criticism, Rahul Gandhi has given  Manmohan Singh  an  opportunity to redeem his image by quitting on a matter of principle  where the Prime Minister's decision  is being questioned by the Vice President  of  his own party.


N.S.Venkataraman
Email:- nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com
  

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Posted by at No comments:

Re: [IAC#RG] WILL MANMOHAN SINGH RESIGN NOW ?

I think India does not have PM.Which PM will resign.........?


On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Girender Singh <girinder_singh@yahoo.com> wrote:
The public of India is mum spectators of governance, either political or judicial... what can be done! The brilliant like you peoples are also silent spectators pouring your views on the subjects which gives nothing more then tensions to the viewers without any solutions.


From: Prem Sabhlok <psabhlok@hotmail.com>
To: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>; "chaddask@gmail.com" <chaddask@gmail.com>; "nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com" <nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 6:19 PM
Subject: RE: [IAC#RG] WILL MANMOHAN SINGH RESIGN NOW ?

Being a nominated Prime Minister by Sonia Gandhi, it is for Sonia Gandhi to take this decision.
Rahul is playing hot and cold.
Rahul Gandhi has termed  the ordinance  to undo the Supreme court verdict on convicted persons from sitting in assemblies and parliament  as nonsense and said it should be thrown away. After throwing this bombshell, Rahul has written a letter of appreciation to P.M about his wisdom and good work done by him.  Obviously there is a deeper game being played by Sonia's Congress. P.M is 100% loyal to Rahul and Sonia who are running dynastic democracy in India. 
Prem Sabhlok 
 
 
 
 
 

 
From: tcgmenon@hotmail.com
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net; chaddask@gmail.com; nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 02:58:16 +0000
Subject: RE: [IAC#RG] WILL MANMOHAN SINGH RESIGN NOW ?

It is time to consider  the consequences   lifting a person on to a pedestal for  which he is not suitable. Rahul's behavior is also erratic, like Nero played the fiddle when Rome was burning.
Tcg

Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 15:17:19 +0530
From: chaddask@gmail.com
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] WILL MANMOHAN SINGH RESIGN NOW ?

 
Dear Venkataraman,

       There are more than one reasons for Manmohan Singh NOT TO REACT.
 
1.    He is inert and normally does not react.
 
2.    The Mom has served the Prime Ministership on a paltter, how & why should he react to her son's bullies.
 
3.     He has to prove his 100% loyality to the Family.  
 
4.     Can anyone think that Manmohan Singh can forward the ordinance on his own (that too going against SC). This was a calculated move (Tabling the ordinance and then snubbing the PM).
 
5.      Any respectable PM who becomes PM on his own merits would have / should have resigned. Here the scenario is different.
 
          There are so many reasons for him NOT TO REACT. One could write a thesis on the subject.  
SK Chadda
 
 
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Venkatraman Ns <nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com> wrote:
 To
India Against Corruption


                                     WILL  MANMOHAN SINGH  RESIGN  NOW  ?


Rahul Gandhi has termed  the ordinance  to undo the Supreme court verdict on convicted persons from sitting in assemblies and parliament  as nonsense and said it should be thrown away.
While , by this statement Rahul Gandhi has tried to improve his public image , what about the public image of Manmohan Singh?  When the Vice President of the leading party in the UPA  makes  such strong  statement in public , Manmohan Singh has to react.
The option for him  is either to defend his decision to issue an ordinance  or  submit his resignation protesting against  the outburst of Rahul Gandhi in public .
At the fag end of UPA II  facing all round criticism, Rahul Gandhi has given  Manmohan Singh  an  opportunity to redeem his image by quitting on a matter of principle  where the Prime Minister's decision  is being questioned by the Vice President  of  his own party.


N.S.Venkataraman
Email:- nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com
  

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in




Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



--



SUPER REFRIGERATION ( KANPUR )

87/152 G.T Road, Acharya Nagar

Kanpur- 208 003


Mobile:     +91 - 9415132480

                 +91 -9616191919

Landline: +91- 512- 2520028

Posted by at No comments:

[IAC#RG] RTI Amendment Bill 2013 (Bill 112/2013)

To:
Joint Secretary (PPG)
Rajya Sabha

04-Oct-2013

BY EMAIL

Sir

This is further to my email of 26.09.2013 concerning public notice dt. 21.09.2013 for the subject Bill.

Please find attached the PDF file containing submissions of the India Against Corruption jan andolan pertaining to the subject Bill.

Our movement would also like to personally appear before the Hon'ble Committee and make our presentations in person.

We would be obliged if you would therefore kindly place our submissions on the record of the Hon'ble Committee for this Bill.

With best wishes,

( Er. Sarbajit Roy )

National Convenor : India Against Corruption, jan andolan
www.indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Mailing address:
2nd floor, B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024
Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)