Hum Janenge

Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Re: [HumJanenge] Aruna Roy knows nothing about RTI

Plz specify the present status of CBI, NIA, NATGrid being added by amendment in the Second Schedule of RTI Act, 2005. I had heard of a court case challenging this amendment but I haven't heard of anything of what happened of that court case.

From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
To: humjanenge <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 11:48 AM
Subject: [HumJanenge] Aruna Roy knows nothing about RTI

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/pune/Bring-CBI-UID-under-RTI-ambit-says-Aruna-Roy/articleshow/14758249.cms

After reading this Times of India news report, I conclude that Madam
Aruna Roy is an ignorant female who hardly knows anything about RTI.

For instance she is quoted as saying "Bring CBI, UID under RTI ambit"
and "Social activist Aruna Roy said that central agencies such as the
CBI, the Biotechnology Regulatory Authority of India and the Unique
Identification Authority of India (UID) should be brought under the
purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act."

For her information, I got the UIDAI brought within RTI a few month
BEFORE it became functional. Now this corrupt lady (a professional NGO
parasite who operates from under Sonia's petticoats) wants to take
UIDAI out of RTI ambit and mislead the public. Very similar to her
efforts to get RTI requests limited to 250 / 500 words till I stopped
her.

Former Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi also had some things
to say in that news report. I shall be posting on him separately.

Re: [HumJanenge] Re: Aruna Roy knows nothing about RTI

I am really waiting for the day when finally sarbijit roy will say or act against congress people? It is alway some other guy....

Much a pity!!

Regards,

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 7:10 PM, sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Guptaji

Your suggestion is very well taken and noted.

Can you please name me any unmoderated platform / forum
where either Aruna Roy or Shailesh Gandhi(ji) will condescend
to share with me ??

In any case one of the prime purposes of this group is to
expose the professional RTI parasites.

Sarbajit

On Jul 10, 2:24 pm, "M.K. Gupta" <mkgupta...@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
> Pl. do not make this platform to settle personal score with the people u r allergic to. If u want to join issues with Aruna Rao or Shailesh Gandhi ji, do it separately and this do not fall in the larger interest of the members of this group. Infighting will unnecessary divert our attention.
>
> ________________________________
> From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy...@gmail.com>
> To: humjanenge <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, 10 July 2012 11:48 AM
> Subject: [HumJanenge] Aruna Roy knows nothing about RTI
>
> http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/pune/Bring-CBI-UID-under-RTI-...
>
> After reading this Times of India news report, I conclude that Madam
> Aruna Roy is an ignorant female who hardly knows anything about RTI.
>
> For instance she is quoted as saying "Bring CBI, UID under RTI ambit"
> and "Social activist Aruna Roy said that central agencies such as the
> CBI, the Biotechnology Regulatory Authority of India and the Unique
> Identification Authority of India (UID) should be brought under the
> purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act."
>
> For her information, I got the UIDAI brought within RTI a few month
> BEFORE it became functional. Now this corrupt lady (a professional NGO
> parasite who operates from under Sonia's petticoats) wants to take
> UIDAI out of RTI ambit and mislead the public. Very similar to her
> efforts to get RTI requests limited to 250 / 500 words till I stopped
> her.
>
> Former Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi also had some things
> to say in that news report. I shall be posting on him separately.

[HumJanenge] Re: Aruna Roy knows nothing about RTI

Dear Guptaji

Your suggestion is very well taken and noted.

Can you please name me any unmoderated platform / forum
where either Aruna Roy or Shailesh Gandhi(ji) will condescend
to share with me ??

In any case one of the prime purposes of this group is to
expose the professional RTI parasites.

Sarbajit

On Jul 10, 2:24 pm, "M.K. Gupta" <mkgupta...@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
> Pl. do not make this platform to settle personal score with the people u r allergic to. If u want to join issues with Aruna Rao or Shailesh Gandhi ji, do it separately and this do not fall in the larger interest of the members of this group. Infighting will unnecessary divert our attention.
>
> ________________________________
> From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy...@gmail.com>
> To: humjanenge <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, 10 July 2012 11:48 AM
> Subject: [HumJanenge] Aruna Roy knows nothing about RTI
>
> http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/pune/Bring-CBI-UID-under-RTI-...
>
> After reading this Times of India news report, I conclude that Madam
> Aruna Roy is an ignorant female who hardly knows anything about RTI.
>
> For instance she is quoted as saying "Bring CBI, UID under RTI ambit"
> and "Social activist Aruna Roy said that central agencies such as the
> CBI, the Biotechnology Regulatory Authority of India and the Unique
> Identification Authority of India (UID) should be brought under the
> purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act."
>
> For her information, I got the UIDAI brought within RTI a few month
> BEFORE it became functional. Now this corrupt lady (a professional NGO
> parasite who operates from under Sonia's petticoats) wants to take
> UIDAI out of RTI ambit and mislead the public. Very similar to her
> efforts to get RTI requests limited to 250 / 500 words till I stopped
> her.
>
> Former Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi also had some things
> to say in that news report. I shall be posting on him separately.

Re: [HumJanenge] My Pending Public Grievance Petitions

How many peoples knows the Companies Act ?
whether information on how to get the information as per provisions of Companies Act is
published in the local language?
Whether such information is esaily accessible to ordinary citizen who is illiterate
Where the network used is very slowly can you assure that by using such inter one can
easily download requested information?
In many areas where there is accute electricity is it possible to use internet?
Why the courts are not applying rule of harmonious interpretation when aim of both the laws is same
to provide information why the courts are wasting the time whether law will be repealed or not
if both laws can survive and only question is under which law information
is given the simle answer is the law under which an applicant submits his under the provisions the information must given
the courts are not willing to implement the law and judgment attached shows that judiciry dont want ordinary citizens right
to information the judgment is proof coorupt mind set of judicary towards the rights of ordinary peoples of india.

viadya

--- On Tue, 10/7/12, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
Subject: [HumJanenge] My Pending Public Grievance Petitions
To: "humjanenge" <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
Date: Tuesday, 10 July, 2012, 12:34 PM

To:
Ms. Anuradha Chagti
Director-RTI/DoPT

10-July-2012

Dear Madam

I refer to my 3 public grievance petitions which are pending with yourself.

Their CPGRMS registration numbers are DOPAT/E/2012/00352, 00353 and
00354 respectively. These are all connected with the a) anti-national
b) corrupt, actions of Information Commissioner Mr Shailesh Gandhi

Despite the fact that my petitions were received and registered on
3-May-2012 and forwarded to you for action by 20-June-2012, I have not
received any communication (leave alone the mandatory interim reply)
within the prescribed period of 2 months to resolve the grievance.

I apprehend that the delay has taken place so as to avoid initiating
prosecution under the Official Secrets Act against Mr.Shailesh Gandhi
who enjoys tremendous political patronage (and which got him appointed
as Information Commissioner despite his incompetence / ineligibility
for the post).

My view is recently confirmed by the Delhi High Court in WP(C)
11271/2009 available at
http://lobis.nic.in/dhc/VS/judgement/06-06-2012/VS01062012CW112712009.pdf

The Hon'ble Court has passed extremely scathing observations about Mr.
Shailesh Gandhi's functioning as an Information Commissioner while
appreciating the on-point decisions of Mr. A.N.Tiwari-ji who was
previously Secretary/DoPT and the architect of the RTI Act.

I would therefore request you to act immediately on my pending public
grievance petitions and initiate prosecution /action against Mr.
Shailesh Gandhi, and also stop his pension (and other post retirement
benefits), if any. It may be recalled that Mr.Gandhi has publicly
stated before accepting office that he would only take Rs.1 per month
token salary, so it is not clear to the citizens why he is getting a
pension now.

Kindly note that the unexplained delay in acting on my petitions are
completely unacceptable as they allowed Mr. Gandhi to carry on in his
post till his tenure, which I find highly suspicious and deserving of
inquiry.

With best wishes,
Yours faithfully

Sarbajit Roy
New Delhi

Re: [HumJanenge] Aruna Roy knows nothing about RTI

Pl. do not make this platform to settle personal score with the people u r allergic to. If u want to join issues with Aruna Rao or Shailesh Gandhi ji, do it separately and this do not fall in the larger interest of the members of this group. Infighting will unnecessary divert our attention.

From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
To: humjanenge <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, 10 July 2012 11:48 AM
Subject: [HumJanenge] Aruna Roy knows nothing about RTI

[HumJanenge] My Pending Public Grievance Petitions

To:
Ms. Anuradha Chagti
Director-RTI/DoPT

10-July-2012

Dear Madam

I refer to my 3 public grievance petitions which are pending with yourself.

Their CPGRMS registration numbers are DOPAT/E/2012/00352, 00353 and
00354 respectively. These are all connected with the a) anti-national
b) corrupt, actions of Information Commissioner Mr Shailesh Gandhi

Despite the fact that my petitions were received and registered on
3-May-2012 and forwarded to you for action by 20-June-2012, I have not
received any communication (leave alone the mandatory interim reply)
within the prescribed period of 2 months to resolve the grievance.

I apprehend that the delay has taken place so as to avoid initiating
prosecution under the Official Secrets Act against Mr.Shailesh Gandhi
who enjoys tremendous political patronage (and which got him appointed
as Information Commissioner despite his incompetence / ineligibility
for the post).

My view is recently confirmed by the Delhi High Court in WP(C)
11271/2009 available at
http://lobis.nic.in/dhc/VS/judgement/06-06-2012/VS01062012CW112712009.pdf

The Hon'ble Court has passed extremely scathing observations about Mr.
Shailesh Gandhi's functioning as an Information Commissioner while
appreciating the on-point decisions of Mr. A.N.Tiwari-ji who was
previously Secretary/DoPT and the architect of the RTI Act.

I would therefore request you to act immediately on my pending public
grievance petitions and initiate prosecution /action against Mr.
Shailesh Gandhi, and also stop his pension (and other post retirement
benefits), if any. It may be recalled that Mr.Gandhi has publicly
stated before accepting office that he would only take Rs.1 per month
token salary, so it is not clear to the citizens why he is getting a
pension now.

Kindly note that the unexplained delay in acting on my petitions are
completely unacceptable as they allowed Mr. Gandhi to carry on in his
post till his tenure, which I find highly suspicious and deserving of
inquiry.

With best wishes,
Yours faithfully

Sarbajit Roy
New Delhi

Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Monday, July 9, 2012