Dear mr. Sarbjit,
Thanks a lot for telling me the link to unsubscribe. By the way I never subscribed to it.
Wish you and the monkey brigade great success in chopping the noses of all those who do not agree with you....till you finally end up chopping your own.
Sincerely
Naveen tewari
Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel
-----Original Message-----
From: sroy1947 <sroy1947@gmail.com>
Sender: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 04:02:35
To: HumJanenge RTI India Right to Information Act 2005<HumJanenge@googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Subject: [HumJanenge] Re: CIC minutes of meeting
Dear Mr Tewari
"This network" as you refer to it, is claimed to be a memorial to Mr
Prakash Kardaley. Mr Kardaley incidentally was the brain behind the
"Save RTI Sack CIC" movement of which Mr Habibullah was the sole
target. All the emails in this connection are available in the
archives of the HumJanenge Yahoogroup and it is quite amusing to
remember the pranks and antics (and language) Mr Kardaley's monkey
brigade used to get up to.
The organisers of this network, being pioneering founders of the
monkey brigade and deeply concerned about the fate of RTI in India if
left solely in the hands of the monkeys, had sought my assistance in
setting up / managing this e-group, as apparently I am the only RTI
personality left who can be as abusive or arrogant or pigheaded than
the late Mr Kardaley.
BTW, Mr Habibullah has already commented on my usage of certain
unflattering (but not abusive) terms on these "blogs" in one of his
decisions as CIC. So in sum, I think it would be much better if we
left the decision on what is acceptable here, or not, to the owners of
this group. The link to unsubscribe BTW, is the same one you used to
subscribe here.
Warmly
Sarbajit
On Nov 20, 2:28 am, nct....@gmail.com wrote:
> Dear Mr Sarabjit,
>
> I do not know you well enough but have chanced upon a few mails shot off by you on this network. I would like to request you to keep some decorum and civility when you are writing pieces which are read by a large number of people. Sometimes the language that you use is very harsh and improper, to say the least. If you continue this kind of at unseemly expression, at least I would like to be out of the network.
>
> Sincerely
> Naveen tewari
> Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sroy1947 <sroy1...@gmail.com>
>
> Sender: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
> Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 01:03:08
> To: HumJanenge RTI India Right to Information Act 2005<HumJanenge@googlegroups.com>
> Reply-To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [HumJanenge] Re: CIC minutes of meeting
>
> Actually sir, its an old charge, publicly made, and backed up with
> the CIC's own datahttp://old.nabble.com/Is-there-a-Lazy-Bum-at-the-CIC---ts29564164.htm...
>
> Incidentally, some RTI activists thought the term "lazy bum" referred
> to Shailesh Gandhi
> who was slacking off in disposing his cases per CIC statistics.
>
> My apologies for my rudeness.
>
> Sarbajit
>
> On Nov 20, 12:49 am, wajahat <whabibul...@nic.in> wrote:
> > How rude Er Roy. And a new charge of laziness long after the event!
> > Wajahat
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: sroy 1947 <sroy1...@gmail.com>
> > Date: Saturday, November 20, 2010 9:50 am
> > Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] CIC minutes of meeting
> > To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
>
> > Well it certainly looks as though CIC(ANT) is making up for lost time and undoing all the damage a certain publicity crazy lazy bum did in his 5 years as CIC. The non-publication of the Annual Reports was entirely due to Pankaj Shreyaskar, and I hope that CIC(ANT) places some observations against him in his ACR.
>
> > Observe also how IC(SM) is now placed higher than IC(AD) in the pecking order.
>
> > Sarbajit
>
> > On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 9:08 AM, PMK1504 <humjanenge.ow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Minutes/Minutes09112010.pdf
>
> > Minutes of the Meeting held on 9 11 10
>
> > Present:
> > Sri A N Tiwari, Chief Information Commissioner
> > Sri Stayanand Mishra, Information Commissioner
> > Smt Annapurna Dixit, Information Commissioner
> > Sri M L Sharma, Information Commissioner
> > Smt Deepak Sandhu, Information Commissioner
> > Secretary and officers assisted the Commission.
>
> > Agenda 1: ATR on the MoM dated 02.11.2010
> > Noted.
Saturday, November 20, 2010
[HumJanenge] Re: CIC minutes of meeting
Dear Mr Tewari
"This network" as you refer to it, is claimed to be a memorial to Mr
Prakash Kardaley. Mr Kardaley incidentally was the brain behind the
"Save RTI Sack CIC" movement of which Mr Habibullah was the sole
target. All the emails in this connection are available in the
archives of the HumJanenge Yahoogroup and it is quite amusing to
remember the pranks and antics (and language) Mr Kardaley's monkey
brigade used to get up to.
The organisers of this network, being pioneering founders of the
monkey brigade and deeply concerned about the fate of RTI in India if
left solely in the hands of the monkeys, had sought my assistance in
setting up / managing this e-group, as apparently I am the only RTI
personality left who can be as abusive or arrogant or pigheaded than
the late Mr Kardaley.
BTW, Mr Habibullah has already commented on my usage of certain
unflattering (but not abusive) terms on these "blogs" in one of his
decisions as CIC. So in sum, I think it would be much better if we
left the decision on what is acceptable here, or not, to the owners of
this group. The link to unsubscribe BTW, is the same one you used to
subscribe here.
Warmly
Sarbajit
On Nov 20, 2:28 am, nct....@gmail.com wrote:
> Dear Mr Sarabjit,
>
> I do not know you well enough but have chanced upon a few mails shot off by you on this network. I would like to request you to keep some decorum and civility when you are writing pieces which are read by a large number of people. Sometimes the language that you use is very harsh and improper, to say the least. If you continue this kind of at unseemly expression, at least I would like to be out of the network.
>
> Sincerely
> Naveen tewari
> Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sroy1947 <sroy1...@gmail.com>
>
> Sender: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
> Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 01:03:08
> To: HumJanenge RTI India Right to Information Act 2005<HumJanenge@googlegroups.com>
> Reply-To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [HumJanenge] Re: CIC minutes of meeting
>
> Actually sir, its an old charge, publicly made, and backed up with
> the CIC's own datahttp://old.nabble.com/Is-there-a-Lazy-Bum-at-the-CIC---ts29564164.htm...
>
> Incidentally, some RTI activists thought the term "lazy bum" referred
> to Shailesh Gandhi
> who was slacking off in disposing his cases per CIC statistics.
>
> My apologies for my rudeness.
>
> Sarbajit
>
> On Nov 20, 12:49 am, wajahat <whabibul...@nic.in> wrote:
> > How rude Er Roy. And a new charge of laziness long after the event!
> > Wajahat
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: sroy 1947 <sroy1...@gmail.com>
> > Date: Saturday, November 20, 2010 9:50 am
> > Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] CIC minutes of meeting
> > To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
>
> > Well it certainly looks as though CIC(ANT) is making up for lost time and undoing all the damage a certain publicity crazy lazy bum did in his 5 years as CIC. The non-publication of the Annual Reports was entirely due to Pankaj Shreyaskar, and I hope that CIC(ANT) places some observations against him in his ACR.
>
> > Observe also how IC(SM) is now placed higher than IC(AD) in the pecking order.
>
> > Sarbajit
>
> > On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 9:08 AM, PMK1504 <humjanenge.ow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Minutes/Minutes09112010.pdf
>
> > Minutes of the Meeting held on 9 11 10
>
> > Present:
> > Sri A N Tiwari, Chief Information Commissioner
> > Sri Stayanand Mishra, Information Commissioner
> > Smt Annapurna Dixit, Information Commissioner
> > Sri M L Sharma, Information Commissioner
> > Smt Deepak Sandhu, Information Commissioner
> > Secretary and officers assisted the Commission.
>
> > Agenda 1: ATR on the MoM dated 02.11.2010
> > Noted.
Re: [HumJanenge] Re: CIC minutes of meeting
Wajahat was more a spokesman of Kashmiris (read Congress), T,V, savvy, publicity seeker. Good riddance. Media had no hestitation in calling him as if he would solve everything.
Anil
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 3:58 PM, <nct.lko@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Mr Sarabjit,
I do not know you well enough but have chanced upon a few mails shot off by you on this network. I would like to request you to keep some decorum and civility when you are writing pieces which are read by a large number of people. Sometimes the language that you use is very harsh and improper, to say the least. If you continue this kind of at unseemly expression, at least I would like to be out of the network.
Sincerely
Naveen tewari
Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel
-----Original Message-----
From: sroy1947 <sroy1947@gmail.com>
Sender: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 01:03:08
To: HumJanenge RTI India Right to Information Act 2005<HumJanenge@googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Subject: [HumJanenge] Re: CIC minutes of meeting
Actually sir, its an old charge, publicly made, and backed up with
the CIC's own data
http://old.nabble.com/Is-there-a-Lazy-Bum-at-the-CIC---ts29564164.html#a29565826
Incidentally, some RTI activists thought the term "lazy bum" referred
to Shailesh Gandhi
who was slacking off in disposing his cases per CIC statistics.
My apologies for my rudeness.
Sarbajit
On Nov 20, 12:49 am, wajahat <whabibul...@nic.in> wrote:
> How rude Er Roy. And a new charge of laziness long after the event!
> Wajahat
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: sroy 1947 <sroy1...@gmail.com>
> Date: Saturday, November 20, 2010 9:50 am
> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] CIC minutes of meeting
> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
>
> Well it certainly looks as though CIC(ANT) is making up for lost time and undoing all the damage a certain publicity crazy lazy bum did in his 5 years as CIC. The non-publication of the Annual Reports was entirely due to Pankaj Shreyaskar, and I hope that CIC(ANT) places some observations against him in his ACR.
>
> Observe also how IC(SM) is now placed higher than IC(AD) in the pecking order.
>
> Sarbajit
>
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 9:08 AM, PMK1504 <humjanenge.ow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Minutes/Minutes09112010.pdf
>
> Minutes of the Meeting held on 9 11 10
>
> Present:
> Sri A N Tiwari, Chief Information Commissioner
> Sri Stayanand Mishra, Information Commissioner
> Smt Annapurna Dixit, Information Commissioner
> Sri M L Sharma, Information Commissioner
> Smt Deepak Sandhu, Information Commissioner
> Secretary and officers assisted the Commission.
>
> Agenda 1: ATR on the MoM dated 02.11.2010
> Noted.
Re: [HumJanenge] CIC minutes of meeting
----- Original Message -----From: wajahatSent: Saturday, November 20, 2010 2:19 PMSubject: Re: [HumJanenge] CIC minutes of meetingHow rude Er Roy. And a new charge of laziness long after the event!Wajahat
----- Original Message -----
From: sroy 1947 <sroy1947@gmail.com>
Date: Saturday, November 20, 2010 9:50 am
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] CIC minutes of meeting
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.comWell it certainly looks as though CIC(ANT) is making up for lost time and undoing all the damage a certain publicity crazy lazy bum did in his 5 years as CIC. The non-publication of the Annual Reports was entirely due to Pankaj Shreyaskar, and I hope that CIC(ANT) places some observations against him in his ACR.
Observe also how IC(SM) is now placed higher than IC(AD) in the pecking order.
Sarbajit
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 9:08 AM, PMK1504 <humjanenge.owner@gmail.com> wrote:
http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Minutes/Minutes09112010.pdf
Minutes of the Meeting held on 9 11 10
Present:
Sri A N Tiwari, Chief Information Commissioner
Sri Stayanand Mishra, Information Commissioner
Smt Annapurna Dixit, Information Commissioner
Sri M L Sharma, Information Commissioner
Smt Deepak Sandhu, Information Commissioner
Secretary and officers assisted the Commission.
Agenda 1: ATR on the MoM dated 02.11.2010
Noted.
Re: [HumJanenge] Re: CIC minutes of meeting
Dear Mr Sarabjit,
I do not know you well enough but have chanced upon a few mails shot off by you on this network. I would like to request you to keep some decorum and civility when you are writing pieces which are read by a large number of people. Sometimes the language that you use is very harsh and improper, to say the least. If you continue this kind of at unseemly expression, at least I would like to be out of the network.
Sincerely
Naveen tewari
Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel
-----Original Message-----
From: sroy1947 <sroy1947@gmail.com>
Sender: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 01:03:08
To: HumJanenge RTI India Right to Information Act 2005<HumJanenge@googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Subject: [HumJanenge] Re: CIC minutes of meeting
Actually sir, its an old charge, publicly made, and backed up with
the CIC's own data
http://old.nabble.com/Is-there-a-Lazy-Bum-at-the-CIC---ts29564164.html#a29565826
Incidentally, some RTI activists thought the term "lazy bum" referred
to Shailesh Gandhi
who was slacking off in disposing his cases per CIC statistics.
My apologies for my rudeness.
Sarbajit
On Nov 20, 12:49 am, wajahat <whabibul...@nic.in> wrote:
> How rude Er Roy. And a new charge of laziness long after the event!
> Wajahat
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: sroy 1947 <sroy1...@gmail.com>
> Date: Saturday, November 20, 2010 9:50 am
> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] CIC minutes of meeting
> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
>
> Well it certainly looks as though CIC(ANT) is making up for lost time and undoing all the damage a certain publicity crazy lazy bum did in his 5 years as CIC. The non-publication of the Annual Reports was entirely due to Pankaj Shreyaskar, and I hope that CIC(ANT) places some observations against him in his ACR.
>
> Observe also how IC(SM) is now placed higher than IC(AD) in the pecking order.
>
> Sarbajit
>
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 9:08 AM, PMK1504 <humjanenge.ow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Minutes/Minutes09112010.pdf
>
> Minutes of the Meeting held on 9 11 10
>
> Present:
> Sri A N Tiwari, Chief Information Commissioner
> Sri Stayanand Mishra, Information Commissioner
> Smt Annapurna Dixit, Information Commissioner
> Sri M L Sharma, Information Commissioner
> Smt Deepak Sandhu, Information Commissioner
> Secretary and officers assisted the Commission.
>
> Agenda 1: ATR on the MoM dated 02.11.2010
> Noted.
I do not know you well enough but have chanced upon a few mails shot off by you on this network. I would like to request you to keep some decorum and civility when you are writing pieces which are read by a large number of people. Sometimes the language that you use is very harsh and improper, to say the least. If you continue this kind of at unseemly expression, at least I would like to be out of the network.
Sincerely
Naveen tewari
Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel
-----Original Message-----
From: sroy1947 <sroy1947@gmail.com>
Sender: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 01:03:08
To: HumJanenge RTI India Right to Information Act 2005<HumJanenge@googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Subject: [HumJanenge] Re: CIC minutes of meeting
Actually sir, its an old charge, publicly made, and backed up with
the CIC's own data
http://old.nabble.com/Is-there-a-Lazy-Bum-at-the-CIC---ts29564164.html#a29565826
Incidentally, some RTI activists thought the term "lazy bum" referred
to Shailesh Gandhi
who was slacking off in disposing his cases per CIC statistics.
My apologies for my rudeness.
Sarbajit
On Nov 20, 12:49 am, wajahat <whabibul...@nic.in> wrote:
> How rude Er Roy. And a new charge of laziness long after the event!
> Wajahat
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: sroy 1947 <sroy1...@gmail.com>
> Date: Saturday, November 20, 2010 9:50 am
> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] CIC minutes of meeting
> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
>
> Well it certainly looks as though CIC(ANT) is making up for lost time and undoing all the damage a certain publicity crazy lazy bum did in his 5 years as CIC. The non-publication of the Annual Reports was entirely due to Pankaj Shreyaskar, and I hope that CIC(ANT) places some observations against him in his ACR.
>
> Observe also how IC(SM) is now placed higher than IC(AD) in the pecking order.
>
> Sarbajit
>
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 9:08 AM, PMK1504 <humjanenge.ow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Minutes/Minutes09112010.pdf
>
> Minutes of the Meeting held on 9 11 10
>
> Present:
> Sri A N Tiwari, Chief Information Commissioner
> Sri Stayanand Mishra, Information Commissioner
> Smt Annapurna Dixit, Information Commissioner
> Sri M L Sharma, Information Commissioner
> Smt Deepak Sandhu, Information Commissioner
> Secretary and officers assisted the Commission.
>
> Agenda 1: ATR on the MoM dated 02.11.2010
> Noted.
Re: [HumJanenge] AID obtains IB's list of RTI activists with suspected terrorist links
AID = Action Aid (India) a well known NGO in RTI.
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 11:22 PM, Mahendra Kumar Gupta <mkgupta1952@gmail.com> wrote:
What is the full form of AID and whether it has obtained the list under RTI Act? However, once the list is obtained, the holder/ receipient of the list is not answerable to tell how the list was obtained but the public authority is under obligation to confirm whether this is a genuine document or not.Now, I don't have any query about Mr Rajeshwar Rao after reading his latest mail.
Re: [HumJanenge] AID obtains IB's list of RTI activists with suspected terrorist links
| Mr Rao, Greetings! Kindly send the copy of list to us as well. We strongly believe because of our proximity to all the communities and our fight against rich, powerful and influential organisation/person, we might well be in the list. Regards, Rajeev Yadav, National President, Adhikaar the rights path. +919811242471 --- On Thu, 18/11/10, bimal khemani <bimal.khemani@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)