Re: [IAC#RG] IS THE POLITICIAN RAHUL AN UNSTABLE PERSON ?

After the likes of Narendra(Modi) & Dave(Gowda) anyone can become PM. Why stability was not suspected when demonitisation was announced at 2000 hrs. unprepared and unpondered? We have had 15 PMs and 30 congress presidents, all elected through due process. Where is the question of monarchy? When Modi is CM for three terms it is " people's choice " and if (Indra) Gandhi does it, it is dictatorship. Why this BJP mongers attempt such misinformation and disinformation? Recently BJP won a mid term poll at Gujarat. I was happy the tide has turned. On a closer scrutiny,  I understand that he was a sitting MLA of the congress defected to BJP on lure of ministership. Stupid votres! They should have routed him out of politics. It is a miracle people still support BJP. Have the read the manifesto BJP 2014? Leave alone election promises like Swiss bank money, two crores jobs per annum, 15 lakh rupees per person. Anyone supporting BJP has killed his soul.

Regards.

On Dec 23, 2018 06:52, sunil kumar <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net> wrote:

Currently india is passing through bad phase because everybody is talking about religion but nobody bothers that our economy has gone haywire. Its credit goes to our politician because our constitution empowered them to make law for the welfare of the nation and its people. Due to this our preamble first sentence begins with people "we the people of india" but who cares? I think no one including Modi otherwise they would not have imposed demonetisation and GST. Tell me who has been benefitted with this? if these two have given phenomenal boost to our economy then why they (govt) are seeking reserve fund of RBI? To divert the people attention they have been talking about religion and caste only?

For the sake of political benefit they have been increasing the period of reservation. Do you think its benefit reaching to the genuine people. Although our constitution has allowed with an hope that downtrodden people would come to the mainstream but is it happening? Now bank is charging money from the customer to carrying their cash? Is it right because who fails to maintain minimum balance it is common man or middle class people.

Instead of addressing this we are talking about Lord Hanuman belong to which caste and religion? See how people were reacting till 90s they were giving huge mandate to one party and thereafter they did not give clear cut mandate with an hope of development. In 2014 they gave huge mandate with an hope that politician would bring prosperity but what has happened. It is known to everyone. It seems people are using all kind of permutation and combination for the sake of development only but getting disappointed from all quarter. Now nation is moving towards civil war.

Now question is not that how nation will survive amid global pressure. As we know that we got freedom because Britishers had started crushing our economy. it is known to everyone (peeth pe maar lo par pet pe mat marna) when Britisher did it then our people annihilated them after making thousand of supreme sacrifice. 

Thanks and Regards

Sunil kumar

On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 10:17 PM Natarajan <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net> wrote:

There are dynastic examples in other parties, but nothing can match the stranglehod of Nehru-Indira dynasty. The ealier rulers of this dynasty had some good qualities too, but Rahul is utterly useless and unstable. Congress minus the Gandhis or their arm-twisting may yet turn out to be better. Please remember Narasimha Rao.

 

With regards 

Prof N.Natarajan

On Thursday, 20 December 2018 8:18 AM, m.g.r. rajan <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net> wrote:

I think Mr. Venkataraman should listen to some recorded speeches of the politicians he has named and see if he is justified by the email he has posted.

Rama Rajan

---

From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net <indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net> on behalf of Venkatraman Ns <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 3:59 PM
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: [IAC#RG] IS THE POLITICIAN RAHUL AN UNSTABLE PERSON ?

 

To

India Against Corruption

                                                                                                                         IS THE POLITICIAN RAHUL AN UNSTABLE PERSON ?

  

The politician Rahul, who was described as buffoon by the Telangana Chief Minister , happened to become the President of the family oriented Congress party by virtue of belonging to the Nehru family ,by way of hereditary succession management.

Obviously, he has been tutored by his paid or motivated friends in India and abroad to describe Prime Minister Modi in all sorts of abusive and indecent language, so that the public image of Modi would suffer heavily before the forthcoming parliamentary election. He has repeatedly called Modi as chor and such language has never been used against any other Prime Minister in the country by any opposition leader. It is Goebbel's tactics. 

In parliament, he spoke highly critically about Modi and then went and hugged him , came back to his seat and winked at his party colleagues, as if he has made great achievement , to the surprise and shock of everyone. This made people wonder whether he is an unstable person and some people even suspecting whether he could be some sort of a play boy.

It is extremely disturbing that an opposition political leader from South India has said that the politician Rahul should be the Prime Ministerial candidate. Fortunately, several opposition political leaders have dismissed such suggestion with contempt.

It is necessary that all discerning citizens of India should putforth utmost efforts, so that an unstable politician like Rahul , who cannot even use decent language in public discourse , should not be successful in his greedy ambition to become the Prime Minister of this great country.

In the next three months before the parliamentary poll, the politician Rahul will bring down the public discourse in India to a new low level and the country men have to put up with this insult, while the sensation seeking media would be highly pleased with the "hilarious reporting opportunity".

N.S.Venkataraman
Nandini Voice For The Deprived
nandinivoice.com

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

--

Sunil kumar

Dehradun

9412992715

Re: [IAC#RG] In agreement with S. Sen

Dear Ms. Sen

Of course it speaks for itself.. .. (without invention) .. The Hindu Code of 1955 which jawaharlal nehru imposed on India.

However, since the English language does not seem to be your strong suit, here goes

"Hindu" - Everybody who is not a Muslim, Christian, Jew, Parsi, Buddhist, Jain, Sikh, Brahmo Samajist, Arya Samajist, Prarthana Samajist, Virashaiva, Lingayat, Scheduled Tribal,  Renouncants of the Union territory of Pondicherry, &c &c.... (ie. the approx 30% remainder/dregs of the Indian population who are collectively known as the RSS)

"Code" - a collection of existing laws , scientifically arranged, and promulgated by legislative authority . A previous example of such a code of "Hindu" law is the "Manu Smriti" which the aforesaid Hindus desire to be reimposed on the non-Hindus.

"1955" - The year (1955-56) in which the 4 Acts of the aforesaid Nehruvian Code were effectively approved in Parliament

"Jawaharlal Nehru" - a "rose" between two "thorns" (also the idiot who believed his Chinese brothers would not attack India in 1962).

On 12/22/18, Sukla Sen <sukla.sen@gmail.com> wrote:
> 《"Hindu Code 1955" which Jawaharlal Nehru imposed on the people of India.》
>
> Dear Mr. Roy,
>
> I. That's a fragment from the very opening paragraph of your post to which
> I responded.
> Hope you'd recognise.
> Speaks for itself.
> A subsequent invention of "Nehru's Hindu Code of 1955" is just that - an
> invention.
>
> Il. Despite categorical rebuttal (ref.: <<Even without counting Sikhs,
> Buddhists, Jains as Hindus, as per the 2011 census, Hindus constitute
> approximately 80% of Indian population.>>), you've repeated:
> <<Today Hindus (as defined in the Hindu Code 1955) only constitute under
> 30% of the population of India.>>
>
> That's ridiculous.
>
> The Census 2011 posits:
> Hindu 79.80 %
> Muslim 14.23 %
> Sikh 1.72 %
> Buddhist 0.70 %
> Jain 0.37 %
> Other Religion 0.66 %
> Not Stated 0.24 %
> Total      100%
> (Ref.: <https://www.census2011.co.in/religion.php>.)
>
> IV. That Rahul Gandhi did light the funeral pyre of his slain father had
> already been established.
> Consequently, the claim that he is a "practising Catholic" comes out as a
> mere (malicious?) hoax.
>
> Sukla
>
>
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2018, 22:39 Sarbajit Roy <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
> wrote:
> Dear Ms. Sen
>
> Just to update you, IACRG is not one of those cozy litte twitterati
> echo-chambers which exist in cyber space. We encourage healthy scholarly
> discussion here and those who are wrong on FACTS (including ourselves) must
> be exposed.
>
> Accordingly, this is issued as a public service communique to the Hindus of
> Hindustan to convey to them the truth about certain imposters masquerading
> as Hindus for cheap electoral gains through deceptions.
>
> 1. We never claimed there was a Hindu Code Act. Any schoolboy knows that
> the Ambedkar version of the Hindu Code Bill 1951 failed to muster support
> causing Nehru to pass it in pieces between 1955-56.  Those 4 enactments are
> known today as Nehru's Hindu Code of 1955.
>
> 2. It is incorrect (in fact it is a gross mis-statement and insult to them)
> to say that Sikhs, Jains and Buddhists would be "counted" as Hindus after
> 1955. If you are capable of reading laws the ways they are meant to be
> read, Sikhs, Jains, Buddhists, and FOLLOWERS of the Brahmo Samaj, Arya
> Samaj and Prathana Samaj were only deemed to be covered/governed by Hindu
> Law.  BTW: The legal significance of the term "followers of the ..." may
> have escaped you.
>
> 3. Today Hindus (as defined in the Hindu Code 1955) only constitute under
> 30% of the population of India.
>
> 4. Insofar as Mr. Rahul Gandhi is concerned, the factum of his lighting his
> father's funeral pyre is completely irrelevant to his misrepresentations of
> himself  as a Hindu Kaul Brahmin of Dattatreya gotra and descendant of Lord
> Parushrama etc etc.
>
> 5. Actually the only thing more ludicrous than Mr. Rahul Gandhi (INC
> President) saying he is a Hindu and Brahmin is Mr.Amit Shah's (BJP
> President) denying he is a Jain and claiming instead to be a "Hindu"
> Vaishnav.  Now, We the Hindustani people of India have had enough of both
> these jumla artistes and their corrupt parties.  ... a POX on both their
> houses.
>
>
>
> Amit Shah doing Jain worship.
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 9:08 PM Sukla Sen <sukla.sen@gmail.com> wrote:

[IAC#RG] SEASON’S GREETINGS TO YOU ALL

While we ready to usher in X'mas 2018, let us keep in our thoughts and prayers our hundreds of tirelessly toiling Home Guards for whom it will be this year be a very Cheerless Christmas as they have not been paid their Honorarium this month.

All this when the Goa Government is pouring crores of rupees down the drain on all that   unprecedented Medical care being accorded to the terminally ill Chief Minister Manohar Parrikar.

It is very appalling and so absolutely distressing to see the manner in which the authorities have been very highhandedly misusing and shabbily ill-treating the Home Guards. They have been reduced to being slaves with absolute disrespect and made to do tasks they are not supposed to.

The Government must get its house in order and ensure that our Human Guards are given the due respect and treated as Human Beings. 

Aires Rodrigues

Advocate High Court

C/G-2, Shopping Complex

Ribandar Retreat,

Ribandar – Goa – 403006

Mobile No: 9822684372

Office Tel  No: (0832) 2444012

Email: airesrodrigues1@gmail.com

                         Or

           airesrodrigues@yahoo.com

You can also reach me on

Facebook.com/ AiresRodrigues

Twitter@rodrigues_aires

www.airesrodrigues.com

Re: [IAC#RG] IS THE POLITICIAN RAHUL AN UNSTABLE PERSON ?

Currently india is passing through bad phase because everybody is talking about religion but nobody bothers that our economy has gone haywire. Its credit goes to our politician because our constitution empowered them to make law for the welfare of the nation and its people. Due to this our preamble first sentence begins with people "we the people of india" but who cares? I think no one including Modi otherwise they would not have imposed demonetisation and GST. Tell me who has been benefitted with this? if these two have given phenomenal boost to our economy then why they (govt) are seeking reserve fund of RBI? To divert the people attention they have been talking about religion and caste only?

For the sake of political benefit they have been increasing the period of reservation. Do you think its benefit reaching to the genuine people. Although our constitution has allowed with an hope that downtrodden people would come to the mainstream but is it happening? Now bank is charging money from the customer to carrying their cash? Is it right because who fails to maintain minimum balance it is common man or middle class people.

Instead of addressing this we are talking about Lord Hanuman belong to which caste and religion? See how people were reacting till 90s they were giving huge mandate to one party and thereafter they did not give clear cut mandate with an hope of development. In 2014 they gave huge mandate with an hope that politician would bring prosperity but what has happened. It is known to everyone. It seems people are using all kind of permutation and combination for the sake of development only but getting disappointed from all quarter. Now nation is moving towards civil war.

Now question is not that how nation will survive amid global pressure. As we know that we got freedom because Britishers had started crushing our economy. it is known to everyone (peeth pe maar lo par pet pe mat marna) when Britisher did it then our people annihilated them after making thousand of supreme sacrifice. 

Thanks and Regards

Sunil kumar

On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 10:17 PM Natarajan <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net> wrote:

There are dynastic examples in other parties, but nothing can match the stranglehod of Nehru-Indira dynasty. The ealier rulers of this dynasty had some good qualities too, but Rahul is utterly useless and unstable. Congress minus the Gandhis or their arm-twisting may yet turn out to be better. Please remember Narasimha Rao.

 

With regards 

Prof N.Natarajan

On Thursday, 20 December 2018 8:18 AM, m.g.r. rajan <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net> wrote:

I think Mr. Venkataraman should listen to some recorded speeches of the politicians he has named and see if he is justified by the email he has posted.

Rama Rajan

---

From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net <indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net> on behalf of Venkatraman Ns <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 3:59 PM
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: [IAC#RG] IS THE POLITICIAN RAHUL AN UNSTABLE PERSON ?

 

To

India Against Corruption

                                                                                                                         IS THE POLITICIAN RAHUL AN UNSTABLE PERSON ?

  

The politician Rahul, who was described as buffoon by the Telangana Chief Minister , happened to become the President of the family oriented Congress party by virtue of belonging to the Nehru family ,by way of hereditary succession management.

Obviously, he has been tutored by his paid or motivated friends in India and abroad to describe Prime Minister Modi in all sorts of abusive and indecent language, so that the public image of Modi would suffer heavily before the forthcoming parliamentary election. He has repeatedly called Modi as chor and such language has never been used against any other Prime Minister in the country by any opposition leader. It is Goebbel's tactics. 

In parliament, he spoke highly critically about Modi and then went and hugged him , came back to his seat and winked at his party colleagues, as if he has made great achievement , to the surprise and shock of everyone. This made people wonder whether he is an unstable person and some people even suspecting whether he could be some sort of a play boy.

It is extremely disturbing that an opposition political leader from South India has said that the politician Rahul should be the Prime Ministerial candidate. Fortunately, several opposition political leaders have dismissed such suggestion with contempt.

It is necessary that all discerning citizens of India should putforth utmost efforts, so that an unstable politician like Rahul , who cannot even use decent language in public discourse , should not be successful in his greedy ambition to become the Prime Minister of this great country.

In the next three months before the parliamentary poll, the politician Rahul will bring down the public discourse in India to a new low level and the country men have to put up with this insult, while the sensation seeking media would be highly pleased with the "hilarious reporting opportunity".

N.S.Venkataraman
Nandini Voice For The Deprived
nandinivoice.com

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

--

Sunil kumar

Dehradun

9412992715

Re: [IAC#RG] In agreement with S. Sen

《"Hindu Code 1955" which Jawaharlal Nehru imposed on the people of India.》

Dear Mr. Roy,

I. That's a fragment from the very opening paragraph of your post to which I responded.

Hope you'd recognise.

Speaks for itself. 

A subsequent invention of "Nehru's Hindu Code of 1955" is just that - an invention.

Il. Despite categorical rebuttal (ref.: <<Even without counting Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains as Hindus, as per the 2011 census, Hindus constitute approximately 80% of Indian population.>>), you've repeated:

<<Today Hindus (as defined in the Hindu Code 1955) only constitute under 30% of the population of India.>>

That's ridiculous.

The Census 2011 posits:

Hindu 79.80 %

Muslim 14.23 %

Sikh 1.72 %

Buddhist 0.70 %

Jain 0.37 %

Other Religion 0.66 %

Not Stated 0.24 %

Total      100%

(Ref.: <https://www.census2011.co.in/religion.php>.)

IV. That Rahul Gandhi did light the funeral pyre of his slain father had already been established.

Consequently, the claim that he is a "practising Catholic" comes out as a mere (malicious?) hoax.

Sukla

On Fri, 21 Dec 2018, 22:39 Sarbajit Roy <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net wrote:

Dear Ms. Sen

Just to update you, IACRG is not one of those cozy litte twitterati echo-chambers which exist in cyber space. We encourage healthy scholarly discussion here and those who are wrong on FACTS (including ourselves) must be exposed.

Accordingly, this is issued as a public service communique to the Hindus of Hindustan to convey to them the truth about certain imposters masquerading as Hindus for cheap electoral gains through deceptions.

1. We never claimed there was a Hindu Code Act. Any schoolboy knows that the Ambedkar version of the Hindu Code Bill 1951 failed to muster support causing Nehru to pass it in pieces between 1955-56.  Those 4 enactments are known today as Nehru's Hindu Code of 1955.

2. It is incorrect (in fact it is a gross mis-statement and insult to them) to say that Sikhs, Jains and Buddhists would be "counted" as Hindus after 1955. If you are capable of reading laws the ways they are meant to be read, Sikhs, Jains, Buddhists, and FOLLOWERS of the Brahmo Samaj, Arya Samaj and Prathana Samaj were only deemed to be covered/governed by Hindu Law.  BTW: The legal significance of the term "followers of the ..." may have escaped you.

3. Today Hindus (as defined in the Hindu Code 1955) only constitute under 30% of the population of India.

4. Insofar as Mr. Rahul Gandhi is concerned, the factum of his lighting his father's funeral pyre is completely irrelevant to his misrepresentations of himself  as a Hindu Kaul Brahmin of Dattatreya gotra and descendant of Lord Parushrama etc etc.

5. Actually the only thing more ludicrous than Mr. Rahul Gandhi (INC President) saying he is a Hindu and Brahmin is Mr.Amit Shah's (BJP President) denying he is a Jain and claiming instead to be a "Hindu" Vaishnav.  Now, We the Hindustani people of India have had enough of both these jumla artistes and their corrupt parties.  ... a POX on both their houses.

Amit Shah doing Jain worship.

On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 9:08 PM Sukla Sen <sukla.sen@gmail.com> wrote:

《By these laws, a Hindu is (negatively) defined to be everybody who is

not a Christian or a Jew or a Muslim or a Sikh or a Jain or a Buddhist

or a Parsi or a Scheduled Tribal or an Arya Samaji or a Prarthana

Samaji or a Brahmo Samaji or a Lingayat etc.and so on.》

Not really. 

l. First of all, there's no Hindu Code Act.

The Code Bill moved by the then Union Law Minister, Dr. Ambedkar - not by Nehru , got defeated on the floor of the Indian parliament. 

Dr. Ambedkar would resign.

ll. Subsequently, Hindu family/personal laws would be amended in bits and pieces. 

Some specifically pertaining to the "Hindus".

Some, to all Indians.

lll. For these purpose, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains etc. would be counted as Hindus. 

Muslims, Christians, Parsis, Jews were not.

Brahmos, Arya Samajis and Lingayats were/are very much considered as Hindus, for all purposes.

That's precisely why there's now a demand from a section of the Lingayats for a separate identity. 

The demand remains to be met.

lV. Even without counting Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains as Hindus, as per the 2011 census, Hindus constitute approximately 80% of Indian population. 

Sukla 

P.S.: The above has, evidently, nothing to do with whether Rahul Gandhi had lit his slain father's funeral pyre or not.

That stands already settled. 

On Fri, 21 Dec 2018, 20:35 Sarbajit Roy <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net wrote:

This is not about US divorce laws or EU marriage laws, rather it is

about the absurd system of laws known as "Hindu Code 1955" which

Jawaharlal Nehru imposed on the people of India.

By these laws, a Hindu is (negatively) defined to be everybody who is

not a Christian or a Jew or a Muslim or a Sikh or a Jain or a Buddhist

or a Parsi or a Scheduled Tribal or an Arya Samaji or a Prarthana

Samaji or a Brahmo Samaji or a Lingayat etc.and so on.

In other words by the present Hindu code less than 30% of India is

Hindu and these consist of the Scheduled Castes and the OBC castes who

get 50+% . reservations.

So it is quite understandable why parasite compradors like Shri Arun

Kumar, Shri Rahul Gandhi, Shri Narendra Modi, Shri Mohan Bhagwat and

the entire RSS etc  insist that they are Hindus and the rest of us

(presumably) are not.

You are quite correct that codifying marriage and divorce laws was for

inheritance and to provide compensation to divorcees, Under the

prevalent codified law, the day Indira Nehru married Feroze Gandhi she

ceased to be a Hindu and he ceased to be a Parsi. Thereafter when

Rajiv Gandhi married Sonia Gandhi under the Indian laws, both they and

their children ceased to have any religion in the eyes of the State.

Therefore it is quite inexplicable that Mr. Rahul Gandhi insists in

public that he is a Hindu of Brahmin caste and claims his gotra from

an alleged distant ancestor Kamala Kaul. His ignorance of True

Hinduism is further exposed when he goes as an idolator to pray in a

fake temple of Brahma which has as its idol a four headed image of a

deity.

Insofar as who is a Hindu, I can suggest either the Tilak test or the

following definition by Raj Narain Bose (the Grandgather of Indian

Nationalism)

"Hinduism defined as worship of Brahma, or the Supreme Being, whose

knowledge and worship all the Hindu Shastras agree in asserting to be

the sole cause of salvation, and other forms of Hindu worship and the

observance of rites and ceremonies as preliminary means for ascending

to that knowledge and worship."

S Roy

On 12/20/18, Prodipto Roy <prodipto.r@gmail.com> wrote:

> I appreciate the perspective offered in Shukla Sen's contribution to this

> issue. It is really absurd to flog this worn horse further.  It's a non-

> starter.  Marriage, according to several judgements in divorce cases in US

> and Europe laws, does not merely concern two individuals or even two

> families but the groom,  the bride,  and their society,  their shared or

> several community/communities. Forms of cohabitation without religious or

> legal acceptance are now recognised in common law,  including in India.

>

> The purpose of codifying marriage and divorce rites in modern - Imperial

> British - Indian law was mainly to protect the estates and inheritance of

> the three parties involved and to determine the rights of the parties - of

> maintenance or compensation due to divorced spouses of the various

> communities.

>

> Therefore,  whatever be the rites followed in the above sets of marriage

> and  death, and their reversal or appropriation by the several communities

> involved it will be impossible to untangle at this point of time the will

> and purpose of the actions of the three concerned parties.

>

> I want to share what a senior  confidante and palace official of late King

> Birendra of Nepal,  Shri Renu Singh told me in 1980 : King Mahendra

> complained to  Nehru about his son wishing to marry out of caste and

> community,  to have in effect,  a 'love marriage'. Nehru said he had had

> the same problem with his only child Indira. He advised Mahendra, who is

> seen as a representative of Vishnu by 'Hindus',  to give up his clinging to

> past convention,  to caste,  tribe and  custom and let the children do as

> they wish. "Parents," Nehru allegedly said,  "can do nothing about this in

> these new times". (I may add that the woman Birendra wanted to marry

> actually refused his offer and went on to marry someone else,  also out of

> caste.)

>

> So,  "the times,  they are changing," and S. Roy ought to give up his

> fascination for true or accurate descriptions of people's religion,  castes

> and  such affiliations,  particularly those of public persons. We are no

> longer in the age of Tulsidas's Ramayana when Ram had to abandon his

> lawfully married Mallika in the forest due to mere suspicion that she was

> sullied by captivity in the kingdom of Lanka.

>

> Joya Roy

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"

Re: [IAC#RG] IS THE POLITICIAN RAHUL AN UNSTABLE PERSON ?

There are dynastic examples in other parties, but nothing can match the stranglehod of Nehru-Indira dynasty. The ealier rulers of this dynasty had some good qualities too, but Rahul is utterly useless and unstable. Congress minus the Gandhis or their arm-twisting may yet turn out to be better. Please remember Narasimha Rao.

 

With regards 

Prof N.Natarajan

On Thursday, 20 December 2018 8:18 AM, m.g.r. rajan <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net> wrote:

I think Mr. Venkataraman should listen to some recorded speeches of the politicians he has named and see if he is justified by the email he has posted.

Rama Rajan

---

From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net <indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net> on behalf of Venkatraman Ns <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 3:59 PM
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: [IAC#RG] IS THE POLITICIAN RAHUL AN UNSTABLE PERSON ?

 

To

India Against Corruption

                                                                                                                         IS THE POLITICIAN RAHUL AN UNSTABLE PERSON ?

  

The politician Rahul, who was described as buffoon by the Telangana Chief Minister , happened to become the President of the family oriented Congress party by virtue of belonging to the Nehru family ,by way of hereditary succession management.

Obviously, he has been tutored by his paid or motivated friends in India and abroad to describe Prime Minister Modi in all sorts of abusive and indecent language, so that the public image of Modi would suffer heavily before the forthcoming parliamentary election. He has repeatedly called Modi as chor and such language has never been used against any other Prime Minister in the country by any opposition leader. It is Goebbel's tactics. 

In parliament, he spoke highly critically about Modi and then went and hugged him , came back to his seat and winked at his party colleagues, as if he has made great achievement , to the surprise and shock of everyone. This made people wonder whether he is an unstable person and some people even suspecting whether he could be some sort of a play boy.

It is extremely disturbing that an opposition political leader from South India has said that the politician Rahul should be the Prime Ministerial candidate. Fortunately, several opposition political leaders have dismissed such suggestion with contempt.

It is necessary that all discerning citizens of India should putforth utmost efforts, so that an unstable politician like Rahul , who cannot even use decent language in public discourse , should not be successful in his greedy ambition to become the Prime Minister of this great country.

In the next three months before the parliamentary poll, the politician Rahul will bring down the public discourse in India to a new low level and the country men have to put up with this insult, while the sensation seeking media would be highly pleased with the "hilarious reporting opportunity".

N.S.Venkataraman
Nandini Voice For The Deprived
nandinivoice.com

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

[IAC#RG] GOVERNMENT NEEDS TO UPLIFT AND NOT ABANDON THE WELFARE OF THE CISF

The Central Government is duty bound to ensure on a priority the utmost well being of the officers and constables of the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF). 

 

It is so horrifying to see the pathetic working and living conditions of these personnel who are shunted around the country wherever their services are requisitioned.

 

It is so painful that due to the work related stress, the suicide rate amongst the CISF is very high.  This force which works so dedicatedly and very professionally, at times even putting their lives at risk must be well taken care of.

 

Prime Minister Narendra Modi must ensure that the salaries, perks and benefits of the CISF and the welfare of their families is enhanced to commensurate with the extremely hard work they put in their line of duty.  

 

The government must Walk the Talk and 'Sab ka Saath Sab Ka Vikas' cannot be its hollow slogan. If the Government does not come to the rescue of the toiling CISF, this would be a fit case for the National Human Rights Commission to intervene.

 

https://www.indiatoday.in/mail-today/story/cisf-clueless-about-solving-stress-ridden-personnel-committing-suicide-1185895-2018-03-10

Aires Rodrigues

Advocate High Court

C/G-2, Shopping Complex

Ribandar Retreat,

Ribandar – Goa – 403006

Mobile No: 9822684372

Office Tel  No: (0832) 2444012

Email: airesrodrigues1@gmail.com

                         Or

           airesrodrigues@yahoo.com

You can also reach me on

Facebook.com/ AiresRodrigues

Twitter@rodrigues_aires

www.airesrodrigues.com