Sunday, February 28, 2016

Re: [IAC#RG] How India must select information commissioners?

Dear Readers,
There are two aspects to CIC appointment. First, what concerned law has provided for. Second, what government has done - was it within the law or whether Govt. has violated law. The section 12 (2) of Right to Information Act 2005 has made provision for CIC as follow: The CIC shall consists of (a) the CIC; and (b) ten Members of CIC. In the section 12(3) the process of selection has prescribe by stating that: (3) CIC and Info Commissioners has be appointed by the President of India on the recommendation of a committee consisting of (I) PM as Chairman, (ii) Leader of Opposition Party, and (iii) Union Cabinet Minister to be nominated by the PM. The only qualification CIC as per RTI Act is that as per Section 12(5) the CICI and Info Commissioners has be persons of eminence in the public life with wide knowledge and experience in law, science and technology, social service, management, journalism, mass media or administration and governance. As per Section 12(6) there is bar on seating MPs, MLAs, or hold on office of profit, carry on business of profit, or hold political party office. That means, the retired officers of government like IAS, IPS, Indian Info services, etc. are eligible to hold office if they have or had in been good books of ruling party. Because of three members of selection committee there are two from ruling government and only one from opposition party who can only raise objection or walk out in case of major difference in selection criteria. As fas as Mr. Bassi is concerned different people have different views about his good or bad handling of situation he was to handle in official capacity. As long as he is not guilty of any major corruption, atrocities on the public at large during demonstration etc. he could be considered along with 5 or 6 officers based on his past 5 years' performance. Benefits of doubts goes in favour of candidates. Hope this clarifies issue!    

Dr. Ratnakar Gedam  





From: Trap Rti <rtitrap@gmail.com>
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net; gaurjk@hotmail.com
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 11:12 AM
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] How India must select information commissioners?

There is a procedure named SEARCH AND SELECTION COMMITTEE 
for selecting candidatee  for the post which does not come under preview of UPSC
The detail procedures can be seen at the website of DOPT 

On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Gaur J K <gaurjk@hotmail.com> wrote:
It is quite revealing how the selection of Information Commissioners are made.
Selection of S. Sailesh Gandhi was an exception. Te rule being appointment of former Civil servants-mostly IAS or IPS officers. The qualifications laid down are favourble to them and so is the composition of Selection Committee.As a result these posts have become tools to favour the favourites of Govt.
From the Civil Society there is little pressure to change the status quo because the RTI activists themselves are a divided lot.
Now more than a decade has passed since the RTI was passed. During this time surely some activists have developed the
requisite expertise and should lay a serious claim to be appointed Information Commissioners both at Central and Sate level. If I remember correctly S. Roy had applied for selection. Let us go by his experience also for not being slected.
Regds
JKGaur



From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net <indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net> on behalf of Rakesh <rakeshbhma@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 6:30 PM
To: Rakesh B
Subject: [IAC#RG] How India must select information commissioners?
 
Hi,
Pls. refer to the following hyperlink:-

http://www.rediff.com/news/column/how-india-must-select-information-commissioners/20160223.htm
There is a great need to introduce a transparent process to select information commissioners, who are expected to oversee transparency, says former Central ...



CHEERS!
Bangalore Raju Venkatesh Prasanna

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in/




Re: [IAC#RG] Sorry state of media in India

Dear Purobi
I agree with you. In the name of news they are spreading the view, false reviews and spreading misinformation to people which not only divert attention from main issue but also make people believe on falsehood. Most of so called reporters are misguided and always infer and construe the things far from reality. There is poverty of both knowledge, poverty in journalism, lack of basic knowledge about issue even use the wrong words in reporting. This perhaps suits the ruling party.  
 
Dr. Ratnakar Gedam  





From: Purobi Ghosh Mohan <cgsi09@gmail.com>
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 9:39 AM
Subject: [IAC#RG] Sorry state of media in India

Dear friends,

I read and watch with unease the state of media in our country today.

Most of those from the fraternity opine, don't report, with scant research to back them up. They are driven by a herd mentality.

Senior journalists write/speak on issues at random and keep silent on many other critical stories which they should be writing/speaking on. Some are heavily dictated by their publication/channel leanings or their private interests.

The media creates hype at will, distorts stories and gives a handle to those with vested interests. The partisan news and views influence politicians, judiciary and legislating bodies.

I understand that the News Broadcasting Standards Authority (NBSA) is a private body and not a legal entity. The Press Club of India (PCI) is a legal body and but yet to widen scope. The new Press Registration and Books (PRB) Act, also, is yet to be passed. It still runs on the 1867 Act.

Such a situation poses immense threat to the nation and to the populace.

It is necessary to raise our voices against this situation and bring the authenticity of news to an even keel. Something needs to be done.

Regards

Purobi Ghosh Mohan

Sent from my iPad
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in/

Re: [IAC#RG] How India must select information commissioners?

Sir in namit Sharma case S C had passed judgment for at least half the commissioners to be from judicial but over active Rights activists made such a hue and cry that S C reversed its judgment so we are left with government trash and government sycophants journalists . Judges would have been thousand times better and unafraid of high ranking officers who appear before them.

On 27 Feb 2016 12:40, Gaur J K <gaurjk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> It is quite revealing how the selection of Information Commissioners are made.
>
> Selection of S. Sailesh Gandhi was an exception. Te rule being appointment of former Civil servants-mostly IAS or IPS officers. The qualifications laid down are favourble to them and so is the composition of Selection Committee.As a result these posts have become tools to favour the favourites of Govt.
>
> From the Civil Society there is little pressure to change the status quo because the RTI activists themselves are a divided lot.
>
> Now more than a decade has passed since the RTI was passed. During this time surely some activists have developed the
>
> requisite expertise and should lay a serious claim to be appointed Information Commissioners both at Central and Sate level. If I remember correctly S. Roy had applied for selection. Let us go by his experience also for not being slected.
>
> Regds
>
> JKGaur
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net <indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net> on behalf of Rakesh <rakeshbhma@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 6:30 PM
> To: Rakesh B
> Subject: [IAC#RG] How India must select information commissioners?
>  
> Hi,
> Pls. refer to the following hyperlink:-
>
> http://www.rediff.com/news/column/how-india-must-select-information-commissioners/20160223.htm
> How India must select information commissioners - Rediff ...
> www.rediff.com
> There is a great need to introduce a transparent process to select information commissioners, who are expected to oversee transparency, says former Central ...
>
>
>
> CHEERS!
> Bangalore Raju Venkatesh Prasanna

Re: [IAC#RG] Sorry state of media in India

Purobi Ghosh Mohan is highly commendable in saying that our national press corps and media have lost their sense of proportion and objectivity in reporting the news. One has to grope in the dark struggling to sift the news from views which are highly slanted and opinionated amounting to subversion even. It's utterly uncalled for in a democracy of our type. It falls to the lot of the responsible civil society to stem the rot, if the government tends to look the other way. Let there be a discussion and consensus for a plan of action in this regard. Best.  







Regards,
D.S.Ranga Rao
8379813275
9969 069 144



On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 11:09 PM, Purobi Ghosh Mohan <cgsi09@gmail.com> wrote:
Boxbe This message is eligible for Automatic Cleanup! (cgsi09@gmail.com) Add cleanup rule | More info

Dear friends,

I read and watch with unease the state of media in our country today.

Most of those from the fraternity opine, don't report, with scant research to back them up. They are driven by a herd mentality.

Senior journalists write/speak on issues at random and keep silent on many other critical stories which they should be writing/speaking on. Some are heavily dictated by their publication/channel leanings or their private interests.

The media creates hype at will, distorts stories and gives a handle to those with vested interests. The partisan news and views influence politicians, judiciary and legislating bodies.

I understand that the News Broadcasting Standards Authority (NBSA) is a private body and not a legal entity. The Press Club of India (PCI) is a legal body and but yet to widen scope. The new Press Registration and Books (PRB) Act, also, is yet to be passed. It still runs on the 1867 Act.

Such a situation poses immense threat to the nation and to the populace.

It is necessary to raise our voices against this situation and bring the authenticity of news to an even keel. Something needs to be done.

Regards

Purobi Ghosh Mohan

Sent from my iPad
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Re: [IAC#RG] Sorry state of media in India

Purabi Ghosh Mohan Ji,

Right you are, all the way. 
Research or unbiased processes in reporting are hardly attempted.
Most of them, if not all, apparently, follow the goals and biases set by their owners. One wishes it was otherwise.

Tragically our own media controlled by the GOI is no better....!
Its all like the saying ..."a people/citizens get the Govt. or media they deserve..."

Peace
dev chopra in gurgaon
UN retiree
***  

On 28 February 2016 at 09:39, Purobi Ghosh Mohan <cgsi09@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear friends,

I read and watch with unease the state of media in our country today.

Most of those from the fraternity opine, don't report, with scant research to back them up. They are driven by a herd mentality.

Senior journalists write/speak on issues at random and keep silent on many other critical stories which they should be writing/speaking on. Some are heavily dictated by their publication/channel leanings or their private interests.

The media creates hype at will, distorts stories and gives a handle to those with vested interests. The partisan news and views influence politicians, judiciary and legislating bodies.

I understand that the News Broadcasting Standards Authority (NBSA) is a private body and not a legal entity. The Press Club of India (PCI) is a legal body and but yet to widen scope. The new Press Registration and Books (PRB) Act, also, is yet to be passed. It still runs on the 1867 Act.

Such a situation poses immense threat to the nation and to the populace.

It is necessary to raise our voices against this situation and bring the authenticity of news to an even keel. Something needs to be done.

Regards

Purobi Ghosh Mohan

Sent from my iPad
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Re: [IAC#RG] Sorry state of media in India

Hi to all,

Mr. Purobi Goshi is right, please treat it is a serious matter to the country.It is ashamed to watch the T.V chaneels, News papers now a days, really wasting time and money for such. There should be some regulatory body to monirtor.

Regards

Hari


On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Purobi Ghosh Mohan <cgsi09@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear friends,

I read and watch with unease the state of media in our country today.

Most of those from the fraternity opine, don't report, with scant research to back them up. They are driven by a herd mentality.

Senior journalists write/speak on issues at random and keep silent on many other critical stories which they should be writing/speaking on. Some are heavily dictated by their publication/channel leanings or their private interests.

The media creates hype at will, distorts stories and gives a handle to those with vested interests. The partisan news and views influence politicians, judiciary and legislating bodies.

I understand that the News Broadcasting Standards Authority (NBSA) is a private body and not a legal entity. The Press Club of India (PCI) is a legal body and but yet to widen scope. The new Press Registration and Books (PRB) Act, also, is yet to be passed. It still runs on the 1867 Act.

Such a situation poses immense threat to the nation and to the populace.

It is necessary to raise our voices against this situation and bring the authenticity of news to an even keel. Something needs to be done.

Regards

Purobi Ghosh Mohan

Sent from my iPad
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Re: [IAC#RG] from a to x to zee

I don't understand why you people cry in the wilderness on matters beyond your control. At best, change the channel, let his TRP fall and the channel wind up. All TV channels are servants of some political party or the other. If public is gullible, a tea master can be the king. The trouble starts with US. We have taken elected leaders to be versatile prodigies. Unfortunately, the leaders also believe themselves to be so. Unless and until we make a degree ( in any discipline, except in Bihar ) as the basic requirement for a people's representatives and make attendance compulsory for all sessions, ' no work no pay ' as the rule, they will not come to o their senses. A politician rejected by his own constituency becomes a central minister, state governor or planning commission chairman. Little do they reflect that they would not have got the job of a chaprasi with their qualifications. Time to show who the boss in a democracy.

Ratnakar Gedam <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net> wrote:

Dear Ms. Seema

Thanks for email.

Normally I do not react or post comments on other's write up. But somehow recent developments are too much disturbing to keep silence.

Indeed it was your article of Zee's Subhas Chandra, self styled leader, self eulogist, self admirer and claimant of supremacy. Zee TV's Sudhir Chaudhary and Rihit Sardana are often make most undesirable comments. In fact, zee TV new channel is anti-congress, as well as against all parties. Subhas Chandra is blind supporter of Narendra Modi and not others in  BJP. News Channels are supposed to report news impartially but they broadcast less news and impose their views, as well as violate all norms of media reporting. In their views other than NaMo none has right to exist. Had it been possible for them they would like to kill all those oppose to NaMo which is tendency found in only dictators. Zee tv does not believe in democracy but only in nepotism, dictatorship, and anarchy.   

Your observations in the write up of "From A to X to Zee", (and prior to that your article on 14 Points of Fascism, I liked most as it was most timely) has made me to write in support of your views as well as respond to others who reacted to both your article as well as commented on my observations.

Surely, welcome to be in touch and share views on matters of recent development too. . I am retired government employee and have to keep busy, so I keep reading. Best wishes, and regards!

Dr. Ratnakar Gedam  





From: seema mustafa <seemamustafa@gmail.com>
To: Ranjit Rai <ranjitrai123@gmail.com>
Cc: Ratnakar Gedam <rgedam@yahoo.com>; "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 9:09 AM
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] from a to x to zee

What have you said Sir is extremely interesting. And confirms a lot
Hope to be in touch
Warm regards
Seema 

Seema Mustafa
thecitizen.in

On 23-Feb-2016, at 8:21 am, Ranjit Rai <ranjitrai123@gmail.com> wrote: