Monday, February 22, 2016

Re: [IAC#RG] from a to x to zee

What have you said Sir is extremely interesting. And confirms a lot
Hope to be in touch
Warm regards
Seema 

Seema Mustafa
thecitizen.in

On 23-Feb-2016, at 8:21 am, Ranjit Rai <ranjitrai123@gmail.com> wrote:



FOR MODERATOR 

WILL RESEND  FULL TEXT WITH BOOK REVIEW SO DO NOT CIRCULATE THE EMAIL BELOW AS IT WENT OFF BY ACCIDENT 

Cmde(R) Ranjit B Rai MBIM(UK)
 Ex Vice President Indian Maritime Foundation
International Correspondent India Strategic & SEAGULL  & B'Caster
C 443 Defence Colony New Delhi 110024
www.indiadefenceforum.com
24335654 +9810066172
 



On 23 February 2016 at 08:12, Ranjit Rai <ranjitrai123@gmail.com> wrote:
By chance I saw these exchanges and have only read MJ and Seema regularly and MJ's book how he is a Muslim from a Hindu ancestoey froim Congress to BJP and his association with Lso have never known them but feel knows them and their leanings but that is neither here or there. 

This is a former Naval Officer but now a researcher,  author,  Radio TV commentator and have never met this man SUBHASH CHANDRA but after reading his book  THE Z FACTOR  ( for which he needs CONGRATULATIONS  to show he is very pro BJP ) he shows how he corrupted DHIRENDRA BRAMACHARI AND OTHERS IN PMO WITH FIRST 50 LACS in cash in the 1980s  to BRAMACHARI  and got contracts to export basmati to the Soviet Union from Rajiv Gandhi's office  through Vijay Dhar and V George   along with an Anil Channa ....the Doons and made CRORES ......He writes openly ........He was investigated by CBI but Intelligence in India is another story I can write volumes as I was Director of Naval Intelligence and lips must remained sealed !                                                                                                                                                                    

Cmde(R) Ranjit B Rai MBIM(UK)
 Ex Vice President Indian Maritime Foundation
International Correspondent India Strategic & SEAGULL  & B'Caster
C 443 Defence Colony New Delhi 110024
www.indiadefenceforum.com
24335654 +9810066172
 



On 23 February 2016 at 07:22, Ratnakar Gedam <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net> wrote:
Dear Ms. Seema

I tried to post following comments but something went wrong. My comments are as follows, you may advice to your editor to get publish it along with your article. Have a nice time!
Good Analysis! I am inclined to agree with you, but needs placing some points in right the perspective to be neutral per se, i.e. neutral in terms of men and matter, putting matters first than men in politics, policies over politics or nationalism (pseudo versus in reality) versus anarchy.
  
There are at least three points that this article articulates which draw attention to.
 
Firstly, media's role in supporting each and every thing that NaMo as Pm does. Indeed, observations are very correct. Subash Chandra's Zee is anti, Congress and Pro-NaMo not pro-BJP. When Jairam Ramesh said toilets as more important than temples, Zee started non-tireless campaign against him. But when same issue raised by NaMo, zee tv has mad all praise for him, as if NaMo was first to invent, forgetting the facts that Jairam was talking about Total Sanitation Campaign which was one of 16 flagship projects of INC then in power. That is, Zee has blind support to NaMo as PM; certainly for aspirations for gains, recognitions of Padma awards, positions as well as profit motive, without tax evasion charges or dragging his empire into tax evasion net. Zee Tv and its all anchors wore pro-Namo spectacles. Therefore, one must expect impartial reporting or DNA from Zee.   
 
Second, each of tv channels have political orientation and support to the one or other political party, therefore almost all channels are not impartial or neutral to any issue or debate. Last general elections to Lok Sabha were not won by NaMo alone by his so called miracle speeches (which indeed lack substance and knowledge of subject he often spoke of) but it was winning of mass media of both digital and print media that unleashed anti-Congress and anti-NaMo parties through 24x7 propaganda. There was debates not on the subjects but pro-NaMo praise. Those who were oppose to NaMo were subject to verbal attack as well as use of abusive. This trend is continued till today and may continue till next general elections. This is bad for democracy and anti-ethical reporting. Media must impartially put forward neutral view and not impose upon the viewers channels' views through their anchors.
 
Finally, freedom of speech granted under Article 19(1) is not an absolute right but is subjected to "reasonable restriction". Nationalism and patriotism have blurred boundaries but are inculcated since the childhood and requires it to be cherished. The nationalism means irrespective its good or bad aspects. Both nationalism and patriotism does not requires certifications either from ruling party or opposition parties, or justification or denounces from anyone, least at least from tv channels owners or anchors who are paid employees of tv owners and re bound to do, say or argue as their bosses wants them, for the sake of continue earning salary. Students are bound to be distracted to ideologies unless are students at formative age are taught as to what is rights from wrong otherwise it would lead to indoctrination of thoughts or ideologies, as could one see in terrorist, criminals, anti-nationals, etc. People ought to differ as no two are identical or no two ideologies are same but neither this is not a time nor universities a place of experiment. No nationalist or patriotic person would accept others' point of view. Also studies and debates of ideologies over tv channels about religions, nationalism, pro-religions differ from crime as defined under the laws of land. The punishment according to law need evidence and it is the duty entrusted to police, certainly media trial and passing judgment on nationalism at least pseudo-nationalism as seen since last few years is nothing but as imposing views of tv channel owners over all others. As do politicians have their own agenda so have tv channels, as well anti-nationals which do try to infiltrate to institutions where youth in large number are easily found and are treated like a reserve army to proliferate ideologies and tap their talent and energy for furtherance of their intentions.  



 
Dr. Ratnakar Gedam  





Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Posted by at No comments:

Re: [IAC#RG] from a to x to zee

After reading this mail chain, I am amused that the writers did not notice the same phenomenon in much bigger scale when UPA was ruling at the Center. This reminds me of the saying ' what is good for the goose is good for the gander'!!!

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad

On Feb 22, 2016, 5:52:18 PM, Ratnakar Gedam wrote:
Dear Ms. Seema

I tried to post following comments but something went wrong. My comments are as follows, you may advice to your editor to get publish it along with your article. Have a nice time!
Good Analysis! I am inclined to agree with you, but needs placing some points in right the perspective to be neutral per se, i.e. neutral in terms of men and matter, putting matters first than men in politics, policies over politics or nationalism (pseudo versus in reality) versus anarchy.
There are at least three points that this article articulates which draw attention to.
Firstly, media's role in supporting each and every thing that NaMo as Pm does. Indeed, observations are very correct. Subash Chandra's Zee is anti, Congress and Pro-NaMo not pro-BJP. When Jairam Ramesh said toilets as more important than temples, Zee started non-tireless campaign against him. But when same issue raised by NaMo, zee tv has mad all praise for him, as if NaMo was first to invent, forgetting the facts that Jairam was talking about Total Sanitation Campaign which was one of 16 flagship projects of INC then in power. That is, Zee has blind support to NaMo as PM; certainly for aspirations for gains, recognitions of Padma awards, positions as well as profit motive, without tax evasion charges or dragging his empire into tax evasion net. Zee Tv and its all anchors wore pro-Namo spectacles. Therefore, one must expect impartial reporting or DNA from Zee.
Second, each of tv channels have political orientation and support to the one or other political party, therefore almost all channels are not impartial or neutral to any issue or debate. Last general elections to Lok Sabha were not won by NaMo alone by his so called miracle speeches (which indeed lack substance and knowledge of subject he often spoke of) but it was winning of mass media of both digital and print media that unleashed anti-Congress and anti-NaMo parties through 24x7 propaganda. There was debates not on the subjects but pro-NaMo praise. Those who were oppose to NaMo were subject to verbal attack as well as use of abusive. This trend is continued till today and may continue till next general elections. This is bad for democracy and anti-ethical reporting. Media must impartially put forward neutral view and not impose upon the viewers channels' views through their anchors.
Finally, freedom of speech granted under Article 19(1) is not an absolute right but is subjected to "reasonable restriction". Nationalism and patriotism have blurred boundaries but are inculcated since the childhood and requires it to be cherished. The nationalism means irrespective its good or bad aspects. Both nationalism and patriotism does not requires certifications either from ruling party or opposition parties, or justification or denounces from anyone, least at least from tv channels owners or anchors who are paid employees of tv owners and re bound to do, say or argue as their bosses wants them, for the sake of continue earning salary. Students are bound to be distracted to ideologies unless are students at formative age are taught as to what is rights from wrong otherwise it would lead to indoctrination of thoughts or ideologies, as could one see in terrorist, criminals, anti-nationals, etc. People ought to differ as no two are identical or no two ideologies are same but neither this is not a time nor universities a place of experiment. No nationalist or patriotic person would accept others' point of view. Also studies and debates of ideologies over tv channels about religions, nationalism, pro-religions differ from crime as defined under the laws of land. The punishment according to law need evidence and it is the duty entrusted to police, certainly media trial and passing judgment on nationalism at least pseudo-nationalism as seen since last few years is nothing but as imposing views of tv channel owners over all others. As do politicians have their own agenda so have tv channels, as well anti-nationals which do try to infiltrate to institutions where youth in large number are easily found and are treated like a reserve army to proliferate ideologies and tap their talent and energy for furtherance of their intentions.



Dr. Ratnakar Gedam




Posted by at No comments:

Re: [IAC#RG] from a to x to zee

Dear Ms. Seema

I tried to post following comments but something went wrong. My comments are as follows, you may advice to your editor to get publish it along with your article. Have a nice time!
Good Analysis! I am inclined to agree with you, but needs placing some points in right the perspective to be neutral per se, i.e. neutral in terms of men and matter, putting matters first than men in politics, policies over politics or nationalism (pseudo versus in reality) versus anarchy.
  
There are at least three points that this article articulates which draw attention to.
 
Firstly, media's role in supporting each and every thing that NaMo as Pm does. Indeed, observations are very correct. Subash Chandra's Zee is anti, Congress and Pro-NaMo not pro-BJP. When Jairam Ramesh said toilets as more important than temples, Zee started non-tireless campaign against him. But when same issue raised by NaMo, zee tv has mad all praise for him, as if NaMo was first to invent, forgetting the facts that Jairam was talking about Total Sanitation Campaign which was one of 16 flagship projects of INC then in power. That is, Zee has blind support to NaMo as PM; certainly for aspirations for gains, recognitions of Padma awards, positions as well as profit motive, without tax evasion charges or dragging his empire into tax evasion net. Zee Tv and its all anchors wore pro-Namo spectacles. Therefore, one must expect impartial reporting or DNA from Zee.   
 
Second, each of tv channels have political orientation and support to the one or other political party, therefore almost all channels are not impartial or neutral to any issue or debate. Last general elections to Lok Sabha were not won by NaMo alone by his so called miracle speeches (which indeed lack substance and knowledge of subject he often spoke of) but it was winning of mass media of both digital and print media that unleashed anti-Congress and anti-NaMo parties through 24x7 propaganda. There was debates not on the subjects but pro-NaMo praise. Those who were oppose to NaMo were subject to verbal attack as well as use of abusive. This trend is continued till today and may continue till next general elections. This is bad for democracy and anti-ethical reporting. Media must impartially put forward neutral view and not impose upon the viewers channels' views through their anchors.
 
Finally, freedom of speech granted under Article 19(1) is not an absolute right but is subjected to "reasonable restriction". Nationalism and patriotism have blurred boundaries but are inculcated since the childhood and requires it to be cherished. The nationalism means irrespective its good or bad aspects. Both nationalism and patriotism does not requires certifications either from ruling party or opposition parties, or justification or denounces from anyone, least at least from tv channels owners or anchors who are paid employees of tv owners and re bound to do, say or argue as their bosses wants them, for the sake of continue earning salary. Students are bound to be distracted to ideologies unless are students at formative age are taught as to what is rights from wrong otherwise it would lead to indoctrination of thoughts or ideologies, as could one see in terrorist, criminals, anti-nationals, etc. People ought to differ as no two are identical or no two ideologies are same but neither this is not a time nor universities a place of experiment. No nationalist or patriotic person would accept others' point of view. Also studies and debates of ideologies over tv channels about religions, nationalism, pro-religions differ from crime as defined under the laws of land. The punishment according to law need evidence and it is the duty entrusted to police, certainly media trial and passing judgment on nationalism at least pseudo-nationalism as seen since last few years is nothing but as imposing views of tv channel owners over all others. As do politicians have their own agenda so have tv channels, as well anti-nationals which do try to infiltrate to institutions where youth in large number are easily found and are treated like a reserve army to proliferate ideologies and tap their talent and energy for furtherance of their intentions.  



 
Dr. Ratnakar Gedam  




Posted by at No comments:

Re: [IAC#RG] A PANCHANAMA OF BJP’s FOUR YEARS IN OFFICE

Well said Mr Malhotra,but who is responsible for the accumulated mess? Obviously,the party which ruled this country for the longest period.They paid little attention to the problems you have mentioned and remained busy in looting the citizens all through.The latest is the loot of citizen's hard earned money from state owned Banks,which runs in to lakhs of carors.Most of these banks have become sick.This has happened in UPA II,before Modi came in as P.M.
Dr.A.Narain.

Sent from my iPad

> On Feb 19, 2016, at 9:42 AM, ravindra malhotra <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net> wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, even educated and intellectuals take too much time to realise that all politicians are the same - Power is the motto. Why to use such words as muck etc against some parties against which a particular person feels aggrieved? Many people will use the same for the present parties in power.
>
> There are so many ills in our society. Violence against women, child marriages, pain of young widows, street children, young girls, boys and women beggars, proliferation of drugs amongst the young, family planning, education of backward classes for elimination of reservations at least in foreseeable future. Have we heard of any political party, that are the largest organised institutions in the country, ever working for elimination of these ills. For that matter even RSS, which is said to be a social and not a political organisation, is not known to work in an organised way towards elimination of these ills. Each of these political parties and their affiliated "social organisations" come forward to give volunteers for electioneering, support for Reservations but do not work towards elimination of these ills that are pulling back our society.
>
> R.N.Malhotra
> Former Chairman Railway Board
>
>
> --------------------------------------------
> On Sun, 2/14/16, Vidyut <wide.aware@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] A PANCHANAMA OF BJP's FOUR YEARS IN OFFICE
> To: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
> Date: Sunday, February 14, 2016, 1:43 AM
>
> @
> Ravindran PM
> I hope you
> realize you're dumping Vajpayee into the Congress
> muck.
> Jokes apart, the
> point is to measure achievements against claims. No one had
> forced BJP to make promises it cannot deliver. If it is not
> possible to "clean 60 years of muck" (as though
> the country achieved nothing till Modi), then BJP could have
> promised what it could do - which is the idea of election
> promises, no? BJP hadn't promised to "clean 60
> years of muck" - nor does it seem to even be interested
> in starting, it had promised specific actions, which it did
> not deliver, as Aires Rodrigues pointed out. I fail to see
> the utility of generalizing very specific evaluations into
> some mumbo jumbo that ends up somehow blaming Congress. If
> BJP cannot govern a place ruled by Congress before, it might
> as well quit politics.
> Vidyut
> Artistic handmade
> soaps by me
> Social Media: Twitter Facebook Google+ Diaspora
>
> Blogs: Intellectual
> Anarchy || Nisarga || tech || Homeschooling ||
> Fek
> Le
>
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at
> 11:00 AM, Ravindran P M <raviforjustice@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> There is no doubt that your analysis is bang on
> target. But to be fair to NaMo and BJP, do you think it is
> possible to clean the muck accumulated by the thugs,
> scoundrels and traitors of scamgress in 60 plus years of
> their reign? Will transplanting the head make all the
> difference to the total personality of a person. Poor NaMo,
> he could not even avoid taking Jaitely, discarded by the
> electorate in no uncertain terms, into his cabinet! Do you
> think that such provisions in the Constitution are in any
> way good for democracy? I am personally of the opinion that
> our Constitution is a big bundle of fraud! Law makers with
> no prescribed qualifications or qualities, clerks with
> continuity but no accountability and utimately the judges
> who combine the worst of both worlds (except for having a
> qualification in law) but made even more worse by totally
> irrational and undemocratic laws like contempt which place
> them not only beyond all laws but even from democratically
> legitimate scrutiny!
> regards
> ravi
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 8:23 PM,
> Aires Rodrigues <airesrodrigues1@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> Election promises
> cannot be like China-make goods which come neither with a
> guarantee nor
> warranty. As the BJP in Goa will
> soon complete four years in office it is time that we, the
> people, audit its
> performance.
>
>
>
> This government has to be
> assessed on the 'Goa Vision
> Document 2012-2017', released by the Party in the run-up
> to the March 2012
> Assembly elections and its acts and deeds over the last four
> years in Power with
> a never ending string of U Turns and the reneged promises.
> On having classified
> the Palm as Grass, less said the better.
>
>
>
> On March 9th
> 2012 Manohar Parrikar took over as Chief Minister by
> burdening the State
> exchequer with those Rs.11 lakhs unnecessarily squandered on
> that pompous
> swearing-in ceremony on SAG grounds at Campal rather than
> the customary modest
> one at Raj Bhavan. And were the best and brilliant from
> amongst his MLAs chosen
> as Ministers?
>
>
>
> In its 'Vision Document' the BJP promised that
> Annual Performance Reports of every government department
> would be prepared and
> publicized. This has not happened. Also promised was
> participatory governance
> at village level as envisaged in the 73rd and
> 74th
> amendments, which too, has not seen the light of the day.
> Promised was a new
> Agricultural policy to make agriculture a more rewarding
> effort but all that we
> witness today is the continued sight of fields and hills
> being converted to
> concrete jungles. We were assured a new regional plan
> keeping in mind Goa's
> identity, but there is no plausible progress in that
> direction while a selected
> coterie of builders are having a field day with
> constructions mushrooming
> everywhere without a provision for basic infrastructure of
> electricity, water,
> parking, sewage and garbage disposal.
>
>
>
> To ensure regular, uninterrupted power supply the
> BJP had promised that the whole of Goa would have
> underground cabling in five
> years and that the State would be plastic-free in three
> years which has also not
> happened. It is almost four years and the promise that a
> garbage management
> system would be in place in 18 months is still a distant
> dream. The government
> has miserably failed in its promise of 12 hours-a-day
> uninterrupted drinking
> water within two years. Also not appointed is the promised
> Minority commission.
> Contrary to the 2012 assurance, the
> six-lane Zuari Bridge was not a priority. Let the government
> enlighten us as to
> how many Non-Resident Goans (NRGs) it has encouraged and in
> what manner, for
> Goa's development, as promised in that Vision document.
> The BJP has only played
> to the gallery on the issue of Special Status but has done
> nothing to control
> the alarming and unacceptable levels of migration into
> Goa.
>
>
>
> We were assured that
> in three months garbage strewn along the roads would be
> cleared. Apart from a mere
> cosmetic exercise on some roads, the garbage situation
> statewide has instead
> turned critical with even the beach cleaning contract being
> a multi-crore scam.
> The BJP has not had the spine to even deliver on its promise
> of banning plastic
> bags.
>
>
>
> Escalating level of crime is a matter of grave
> concern while political interference in police functioning
> is turning Goa into
> a lawless State. The promise to get rid of the Casinos from
> the River Mandovi
> was another joke.
>
>
>
> The BJP had promised that Professionals and not
> Politicians would head Corporations and other bodies but to
> our utter dismay, all
> the Corporations have been loaded with political cronies,
> some of whom carry
> woefully tainted.
>
>
>
> Various schemes launched to pay doles and build
> vote banks are in bad taste. Welfare measures cannot be
> treated as gifts of the
> ruling party but have to meet the needs of the deserving.
> Even on the Medium of
> Instruction (MOI) issue there has been an oscillating volte
> face.
>
>
>
> While in the Opposition the BJP had always vociferously
> criticized the
> wasteful expenditure of Ministers and MLAs on unnecessary
> travel, especially
> the foreign junkets, but over the last four years the
> current Ministers and
> MLAs have been jetting around the world
> recklessly, while draining an already depleted the
> exchequer.
>
>
>
> With so much hype on
> e-governance, Goa's bureaucracy is bloating by the day.
> Despite the current
> financial crisis, the BJP has been s hiring thousands more
> to accommodate his
> party cadres. One of the first decisions by the BJP on
> taking over office in
> March 2012 was to hike the fees of the Advocate General
> Atmaram Nadkarni from
> Rs five lakhs to a whopping eight lakhs a month. Despite the
> hike Atmaram
> Nadkarni has continued to be the legal Messiah of the Mining
> Barons, Casino
> Lobby and the Builders.
>
>
>
> In his first budget
> speech in 2012 the then Chief Minister Manohar Parrikar had
> assured that every
> Department would implement e-governance within 18 months.
> Sadly, most
> government websites are dysfunctional or remain not updated
> for months. The 'aam
> aadmi' is now paying much more for every
> government service. Even the fee for registering a Power
> of Attorney
> which was earlier Rs.50/-, shot up to Rs.500/-.
>
>
>
> Despite having been
> given a clear mandate, the BJP has been unable to deliver on
> the 'Parivartan'
> that it promised by way of Good governance and Zero
> tolerance to corruption.
> Rampant corruption continues unabated. Scams continue
> galore. What has changed
> is only the identity of the agents, brokers and
> beneficiaries. And we are
> without a Lokayukta till the BJP finds a pliable one!
>
>
>
>
> Last year Manohar
> Parrikar left Goa and passed on the baton to Laxmikant
> Parsekar but every Goan
> will vouch that it has been four dismal years of confusion,
> contradictions and
> controversies. This may sound like a requiem but that, is
> the unfortunate
> ground reality. During the 2012 election campaign, Manohar
> Parrikar had
> promised us the moon but reneged on almost every promise. He
> used every trick
> under his sleeve to usurp the office of Chief Minister. We
> thought he had
> learnt from his past mistakes and would turn a new leaf.
> Sadly, it was not to
> be. It was the same old Manohar Parrikar, puffed up with
> added arrogance
> and highly allergic to any criticism.
>
>
>
> His one remarkable achievement is of having stifled
> the entire voice of the Opposition. Through his trademark
> tactics he successfully
> caged and grounded most Opposition MLAs. Surprisingly, to
> Parrikar's credit
> goes the fact that many of the otherwise vocal and proactive
> NGOs have also gone
> comatose.
>
>
>
>
>
> With elections due
> within a year, we have had a very pompous Carnival and an
> equally colourful
> Shigmo will follow. But this is a sign of bad governance -
> when a State
> sponsors fun and frolic when its coffers are empty. The
> government has been on
> a borrowing spree. How long will it be able to sustain such
> lavish spending?
>
>
>
> We are reminded of the
> words of Manohar Parrikar in his first budget speech of
> 26th March
> 2012: "Speaker
> Sir, the election results made me speechless, and now is the
> time for me to
> speak and assure the people, that the faith and trust they
> have put in us,
> shall be responded and honoured in multiple"
>
>
>
>
> But the BJP has not honoured the faith and trust
> the people of Goa reposed in the party. The actions of the
> government speak for
> themselves. We were hoping that the
> 'Parivartan' in 2012 would be
> for the better. But the question that torments the common
> man today is "Have we
> landed from the frying pan into the fire?"
>
>
>
> Aires
> Rodrigues
> Advocate
> High Court C/G-2,
> Shopping ComplexRibandar
> Retreat,Ribandar
> – Goa – 403006
> Mobile
> No: 9822684372
> Office
> Tel No: (0832) 2444012Email:
> airesrodrigues1@gmail.com Or airesrodrigues@yahoo.com
> You
> can also reach me on
> Facebook.com/
> AiresRodrigues
> Twitter@rodrigues_aires
>
> www.airesrodrigues.com
>
>
>
> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
>
> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
>
> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
>
> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
>
> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>
>
>
> --
> Veteran
> Major P M Ravindran
> http://raviforjustice.blogspot.com
>
> You may also like to visit:
> 'Judiciary Watch' at www.vigilonline.com
> http://www.judicialreforms.org/
> http://www.roguepolice.com
> http://milapchoraria.tripod.com
>
>
> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
>
> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
>
> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
>
> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
>
> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
>
> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Posted by at No comments:

[IAC#RG] from a to x to zee

Posted by at No comments:

[IAC#RG] GOA CIC PRASHANT TENDOLKAR’S ILLEGAL RED BEACON LANDS IN HIGH COURT

GOA CIC PRASHANT TENDOLKAR'S ILLEGAL RED BEACON LANDS IN HIGH COURT

 

A contempt of Court petition has today been filed before the Bombay High Court at Goa over the illegal use of the red beacon by Goa's Chief Information Commissioner (CIC) Prashant Prabhu Tendolkar.

 

The letter petition was mentioned today before a Division Bench comprising of Justice F.M.Reis and Justice K.L.Wadane who agreed to examine the petition.

 

CIC Prashant Tendolkar continues to illegally use the red beacon in rank violation of the Supreme Court order. The rule of law has to prevail and the CIC cannot be high- handedly using a perk and privilege he is not entitled to.  CIC Prashant Tendolkar is illegally and blatantly using the red beacon on his official vehicle GA- 07-G-5555 in clear defiance of law and amounting to a gross contempt of the Supreme Court's order.

 

In the petition today it has been submitted to the High Court that interest of Justice would demand that in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, that Suo moto cognizance be taken by the High Court in calling for the records and after examining the same taking appropriate action.

 

The Supreme Court in its order dated December 10, 2013 while expressing deep concern over the misuse of the red beacon had given certain directions to the State Government and in compliance the Goa Government by a notification dated 3rd July 2014 had notified the list of persons entitled to use the red beacon on their official vehicle.

 

The High Court's attention has today been drawn that as per that notification only allowed to use the red beacon are the Governor, Chief Minister and Ministers, Speaker, Deputy Speaker, Chief Justice and Judges of the High Court, Leader of Opposition, Advocate General and the Chief Secretary.

 

The law enforcement officers though fully aware of this blatant violation had failed to take action against CIC Prashant Tendolkar only because he is politically well connected and only after a complaint was filed a challan and show cause notice was issued to the CIC.

 

The attention of the High Court has also been drawn to the very evasive, misleading and mischievous reply of the CIC to the show cause notice issued by the transport department. The CIC while trying to justify his using the red beacon has strangely claimed that he is equivalent in rank with a Supreme Court Judge.


The CIC in the reply has further stated that if the mere non inclusion of the CIC in the State list disentitles him from using the red beacon, it would amount that the other central dignitaries whose names are not included on the list cannot also use the red beacon in the State.


A copy of the letter petition has been sent to the Chief Justice of India T.S.Thakur and the Chief Justice of Bombay High Court D.H.Waghela.


Aires Rodrigues

Advocate High Court

C/G-2, Shopping Complex

Ribandar Retreat,

Ribandar – Goa – 403006


Mobile No: 9822684372


Office Tel  No: (0832) 2444012

Email: airesrodrigues1@gmail.com

                         Or

           airesrodrigues@yahoo.com


You can also reach me on


Facebook.com/ AiresRodrigues


Twitter@rodrigues_aires


www.airesrodrigues.com


Posted by at No comments:

Sunday, February 21, 2016

Re: [IAC#RG] TREAT STUDENT POLITICIAN AS POLITICIAN AND NOT AS STUDENT

I agree will all the writers, specially the quote of Dr V V Giri, ex president of India that students should be aware and well verse of the political activities in the country, but should concentrate in their studies only. Once you are finished with your study you can go ahead with your own thought and join politics. 
Secondly, any kind of anti-national sentiments or overtures should be dealt with strict and extreme force under the law which should be strong enough to take care of such situations. 
Thirdly, any kind of violence, whether political, students, hooligans or from anybody, should be condemned and denounced. Police should be given free hand to tackle such situations under the law without fear and without political interference.
Dr Deepak Bhatia 


On Saturday, 20 February 2016 11:50 PM, T. K. Arun <Tk.Arun@timesgroup.com> wrote:


Do see the following links. Some of the earliest comments in defence of JNU students appeared in ET and on the site
Regards
TK Arun
 
http://blogs.economictimes.indiatimes.com/cursor/how-sedition-charge-in-jnu-over-afzal-guru-harms-democracy/
http://blogs.economictimes.indiatimes.com/et-editorials/jnu-row-sedition-charge-against-student-leader-amounts-to-contempt-of-supreme-court/
http://blogs.economictimes.indiatimes.com/et-commentary/why-the-government-needs-to-engage-with-jnu-students-not-crack-down-on-them/
http://blogs.economictimes.indiatimes.com/Swaminomics/jnu-stir-why-anti-nationalism-is-an-empty-abuse-that-has-no-place-in-a-free-society/
 
http://blogs.economictimes.indiatimes.com/et-editorials/jnu-row-the-politics-behind-hooligan-lawyers/
http://blogs.economictimes.indiatimes.com/et-commentary/killing-our-campuses/
 
 
From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net [mailto:indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of Prodipto Roy
Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2016 9:45 AM
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] TREAT STUDENT POLITICIAN AS POLITICIAN AND NOT AS STUDENT
 
Please let me know why your site is saying nothing in defence of the students and staff who were beaten up within the court compound and against the so-called lawyers who instigated the crimes or the police who looked on and did nothing?
To the manager's of this site: why has no one filed a writ against the police's inaction and their complicity with the perpetrators of mob violence?
Joya Roy
On 19 Feb 2016 23:31, "Dharmesh Dutta" <duttadharmesh@gmail.com> wrote:
There exists a great deal of cacophony that's secondary to our lives, in that most of us who share our thoughts are neither the culprits nor the victims, lest we should have had radical views.
The question therefore is, 'How often our collective thoughts have been well structured that deserved eyes and ears of the nation so diverse?'
On the captioned topic, the choice is between those who want to become politicians to camouflage their 'fear' and those who steadfastly pursue it as a career. Whilst the former needs no great sacrifice, the latter entails persecution. Its the balance between the two that decides the success or failure of democracy.
We need all sorts of professionals to cater to over 1.2 billion population. Then why not a professional 'Student Politician'?
Our institutions have indeed produced some of the brilliant minds and should be as such held in high esteem.
At 17 we complete schooling and enter into a professional stream. Give the 'Student Politician' a decade (5 years of knowledge + 5 years of wisdom) to get into the mainstream politics, else he or she shall no longer be construed as a 'Student Politician' thereby paving way for other aspirants.
The very fact that we have "Elections" and "Unions" goes to prove that a teacher need not always teach and a student need not always study!
Regards
Dharmesh
On Feb 17, 2016 10:54 PM, "Dr Ajay Narain" <drajaynarain@hotmail.com> wrote:
I whole heartedly endorse your views.The primary duty of students is to pay attention on their studies and not indulge in politics due to misguided politicians. The ugly situation which happened in JNU and subsequent interference by politicians of all hue particularly defense of such unpatriotic gundaas of the university by Congress and Left parties was most unworthy and shameful.Instead of condemning the event they talked about freedom of speech,quoting the Constitution,without understanding the limits of it.Calling the action of the govt a fascist act is utter nonsense.In fact they should have cooperated in identifying the culprits as most belong to their cadre. 
        Further, most of the TV Channels,have also become the mouthpieces of the Left parties as many of the anchors come from the same background.There is a evident bias in their not only reporting but also they deliberately bring panelist who support anti nationalists,and try to defame the the rightful action by the police.
Dr A. Narain. 

Sent from my iPad

On Feb 14, 2016, at 8:59 PM, Venkatraman Ns <nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com> wrote:
    
To
 
India Against Corruption
 
                                                                                          TREAT STUDENT POLITICIAN AS POLITICIAN AND NOT AS STUDENT
 
 
 
When I was a student in Annamalai University in Tamil Nadu, I attended a meeting addressed by Mr. V.V.Giri, former Vice President and President of India.
During the question and answer session, I asked Mr.V.V.Giri as to whether the students can get themselves involved in political activities. Mr. V.V. Giri replied without hesitation that students should do the following three things, namely study, study and study.
 
Mr. Giri  who was an active trade union leader before becoming the Vice President of India pointed out that students should know politics but should not involve themselves in politics, as it would divert the attention from the primary task of studying and learning. Students getting involved in politics is neither in their interest nor in the interest of the nation.
 
The recent incidents in J N U, Delhi , where students planned cultural programme to protest against the hanging of Afzal Guru, the agitation by students in Hyderabad University when a student committed suicide and the support readily given to such agitations by politicians , only highlight the fact that politics have made deep inroads in the academic institutions and universities.
 
In recent times in Tamil Nadu,  several students have indulged in rowdy like behavior and frequently indulged in condemnable acts such as fighting between themselves with knives, hijacking the transport buses and even murdering teachers. Many of such students have affiliations to one political party or the other and if the police would initiate action against them, politicians interfere in their support.
 
It is seen that more than 95% of the students are interested only in academic pursuits. Only  minority  of students who have criminal mind set or who want to launch themselves as politicians in future, indulge in such rowdy like behavior.  Unfortunately, the print and visual media give huge publicity to such deplorable activities of small group of students, which virtually amount to encouraging  them,  as these politicians in the making get all the publicity that they want.
 
In this scenario, it is appropriate that the Government of India has taken action against the agitating JNU students  and strongly deplored their behavior. As expected, several politicians in the opposition parties and some so called activists criticize the  action of the government of India with  ready made statements such as curtailing the freedom and reminiscence of the emergency days etc. As usual, the print and visual media give more publicity and space  to the activities of the student and utterances of the critical politicians, than the views of the government.
 
It is high time that we treat the student  politician as politician and not as student and refrain from giving the benefit of treating  with kid gloves. 
 
N.S.Venkataraman
Nandini Voice For The Deprived
nandinivoice.com

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)