Thursday, March 19, 2015

Re: [IAC#RG] Mafia Tatkal Reservation

Here is the reason for all these problems our members agitated.

http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/railways-blows-lid-off-racket-to-hoard-4000-tickets-in-a-minute/

Sarbajit


On 6/30/14, krishna kumar pande <pandekk@gmail.com> wrote:
> I had an experience yesterday when my daughter went to the Haldwani Railway
> station to get here Tatkal ticket booked. She left at 8 to see that she
> could get a ticket by standing in a queue.
> There was no queue instead a person was giving the sl no of your umber .
> She got No 24 and 25 for the two tickets that she had to book for the
> morning train. She was told to come back at 10 when the line was in place.
> We could not get the tickets but it shows that the initial numbers are of
> those who manipulate the system as there was no one at the station at that
> time.
>
>
>>
>> From: shantibhush@gmail.com
>> Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 21:46:49 +0530
>> To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
>> Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Mafia Tatkal Reservation
>>
>>
>> This needs an enquiry by some senior Raiway Officer.
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On Jun 28, 2014, at 11:57 AM, Ankit Khetan <ankkhe2002@yahoo.co.in>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Today while I have gone to book the ticket in the railway reservation
>> > counter , I have seen that more than 15 - 20 tatkal tickets were already
>> > booked by the counter before 10am. The tatkal ticket booking was already
>> > started since 9:45 am.
>> > Is this the tatkal reservation or Mafia Tatkal.
>> > What actually was happening could any one who has knowledge of this
>> > system please simplify it.....
>> > How all the tatkal tickets is finished till 10:01 am....
>> >
>> > Ankit Khetan
>> > India

[IAC#RG] Protest against decision taken by NHRC closing case : evident delinquency in maintaining records at NHRC office

19 March 2015

 

To

The Chairman

National Human Rights Commission

Manav Adhikar Bhawan
Block-C, GPO Complex, INA
New Delhi – 110023

 

 

Ref.:- The NHRC Case No.1491/25/15/2012-PF

Our Complaint dated 10.9.2012

Respected Sir,


On 16.3.2015 I perused the website of the Commission in connection with the above noted case reference and found that the Commission observed that I did not send any comments on the report of BSF and Police by 6.5.2013.


In this connection I would like to mention that I received the Commission's letter dated 5.4.2013 along with the copy of the report from Police and BSF authority. Upon receipt of the same I sent my comments on the police and BSF report to the Commission through my email on 23.4.2013. One copy of the said email dated 23.4.2013 containing my comments on the police and BSF report is attached herewith for your kind perusal. 


I hope that the Commission would note the above in the record in connection with the above noted case reference and take appropriate action in this regard.


Thanking You,

Yours truly

 

 

Kirity Roy

Secretary, MASUM

 

 

 

 

 

Reply to NHRC Case no. 1491/25/15/2012-PF
2 messages


Kirity Roy <kirityroy@gmail.com>

Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 6:07 PM

To: NHRC <covdnhrc@nic.in>, ionhrc@nic.in

Cc: "Member NHRC Mr. Satyabrata Pal" <satyabrata49@hotmail.com>, jrlawnhrc <jrlawnhrc@nic.in>

 

To
The Chairman
National Human Rights Commission
Faridkot House
Copernicus Marg
New Delhi-110001                                                                                                                             23 April 2013

 

Ref.:- Your Letter dated 5.4.2013 in connection with NHRC Case no. 1491/25/15/2012-PF

Our complaint dated 10.9.2012

Our comments against the reports of BSF and Police

 

Respected Sir,

First of all I want to apologies for my previous reply sent to you yesterday by email. Please ignore that. Here is my reply.

We received your letter dated 5.4.2013 in connection with NHRC Case no. 1491/25/15/2012-PF along with the documents attached with your letter. We place our comments on the reports herein below:-

It is stated in the report of the Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Basirhat, North 24 Parganas that during enquiry Ms. Aleya Bibi stated that Jafar Gazi, son of Siraj Gazi of Nabatkati, distant relatives of the petitioner has taken Rs. 1000/- from her on the plea that he had to pay it to the Custom Officer. But surprisingly the enquiring officer did not examine Jafar Gazi for the reasons best known to him. The victim Jubbar Molla and his mother Aleya Bibi were examined by the enquiring officer and they affirmed the incident of torture and apprehension of the victim by the perpetrator BSF personnel before the enquiring officer.

 

It is also stated in the enquiry report of the Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Basirhat that "…Officer of Khalsi BOP and Kaijuri of 152 Bn BSF were also examined and relevant documents were examined but nothing could be found to corroborate that Jubbar was either apprehended or detained by the BSF authority…" In this juncture we would like to mention that in Paragraph 4 of the BSF report it is stated that Zubbar Molla (age approx. 10 years) was apprehended on 1st July, 2012 and he was brought at BOP Khalsi for preliminary questioning. Then he was sent to Saraful Rural Hospital for medical examination and he was handed over to custom authority Tentulia. Such report of BSF itself evident the cruel and inhuman treatment committed upon the victim Jubbar Molla who is a minor. The victim being a minor was subjected to questioning as evident from the report.  The report is itself proof that the victim's parents were not informed about his apprehension by the BSF personnel and he was clandestinely handed over to customs officials.

 

On the other hand the Superintendent of Customs, Tentulia Customs Preventive Unit in his letter (Memo no.- C no. VIII(26)tent/Cus/Con/2006/376) dated 8.10.2012 addressed to the Officer-in-Charge of Swarupnagar Police Station affirmed that no such case booked from 25th July, 2012 to 1st August, 2012 in the matter of the victim boy Jubbar Molla, son of Rabiul Molla of Nabatkati, Police Station-Swarupnagar, North 24 Parganas.  

The Additional Superintendent of Police, Barasat, North 24 Parganas vide his letter(Memo no. 352/NZ) dated 11.2.2013 addressed to the Superintendent of Police, North 24 Parganas  stated that during enquiry it has been transpired that BSF personnel had allegedly detained Jubbar Molla on 27th July, 2012 while he was grazing cattle and he was subsequently released. 

 

Therefore, in short, the reports of the authorities are contradictory with each other and there is no attempt to come with clean hands with their so called reports before the Commission. It seems that the police and BSF authorities are only concerned to save their skin. There is no doubt to assume that the reports are manufactured and concocted.

 

Hence we request the Commission to set aside the reports placed before the Commission by BSF and the police authorities and direct a neutral investigation by the Commission's own investigation wing by considering the comments placed by us.

 

Thanking You,

Yours truly

 

Kirity Roy

Secretary, MASUM     

--
Kirity Roy
Secretary
Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha
(MASUM)
&
National Convenor (PACTI)
Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity
40A, Barabagan Lane (4th Floor)
Balaji Place
Shibtala
Srirampur
Hooghly
PIN- 712203
Tele-Fax - +91-33-26220843
Phone- +91-33-26220844 / 0845
e. mail : kirityroy@gmail.com
Web: www.masum.org.in

Wednesday, March 18, 2015

Re: [IAC#RG] For Prof. Anand Kumar - JNU / AAP

AAP is going through self interrogation. Your good wishes and concern are helpful.
Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel

-----Original Message-----
From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
Sender: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 16:19:41
To: indiaresists<indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Reply-To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: [IAC#RG] For Prof. Anand Kumar - JNU / AAP

To:
Prof. Anand Kumar - JNU / AAP

Sir

What is happening inside your party ?

http://www.firstpost.com/politics/arvind-kejriwals-desperate-appointment-of-21-backdoor-ministers-may-face-a-legal-challenge-2158019.html

Is the AAP 'andolan' phase over now that we have to watch such things
? We are very perturbed and would like to assist all good persons left
within AAP.

Sarbajit, IAC

[IAC#RG] For Prof. Anand Kumar - JNU / AAP

To:
Prof. Anand Kumar - JNU / AAP

Sir

What is happening inside your party ?

http://www.firstpost.com/politics/arvind-kejriwals-desperate-appointment-of-21-backdoor-ministers-may-face-a-legal-challenge-2158019.html

Is the AAP 'andolan' phase over now that we have to watch such things
? We are very perturbed and would like to assist all good persons left
within AAP.

Sarbajit, IAC

[IAC#RG] FW: MISGIVINGS ON MODI GOVERNMENT’S LAND ACQUISITION BILL JUSTIFIED

Land reform bill.


From: gaurjk@hotmail.com
To: veke_ramanathan@yahoo.co.in
Subject: RE: [IAC#RG] MISGIVINGS ON MODI GOVERNMENT'S LAND ACQUISITION BILL JUSTIFIED
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 13:08:55 +0530

18/3/15

Modi Govt. has seriously erred on this issue ignoring the following factors-

1. Very liittle time was allowed to assess the results of the land reform bill 2013 of UPA Govt. which was passed after protracted negotiations. Through this Sonia Gandhi tried to portray herself a s Champion of farmers interest.
2. Undue haste was shown in bringing the Ordinance so much so that even the President had to question what was the haste in bringing the Ordinance.
3. Failed to anticipate the emotive response of the masses and its exploitation by the opposition.
4. The Prime Minister is carrying a baggage of pro-industry and anti-farmer animus from his Gujrat governance of over a decade.
 5. Not doing enough spade work to justify  aquisition for private players.

Although the Govt. has gone on record to say that they are only  restarting to complete the stalled project in infrastrcture of UPA Govt. they should have given the details of such projects and the land required for those projects, money already invested in those projects by UPA Govt. and the NPAs of the Banks.
Surprisingly UPA has gotten away with huge land acquisition Projects for SEZ projects for Private players through out the Country and its architect the former Miniter Kamal Nath. Suffice to remind of two projects of Relianace in Haryana and Maharastra each involving more than 5000 acres of Agril land.
Land for roads and houses for the rural poor should have been left for the Punchayats to implement.
Likewise land for defence projects in rural areas is also a very weak ground. As it is Land already with the defence is not properly utilised, is heavily encroached upon and misutilised for entertainment like Golf clubs. Otherwise scams like Adarsh in Mumbai and North east would have not occured.It will not be out of place to me ntion that Raghuraman before he became the Governor of RBI had termed the land scam as the biggest scam in India.
The Govt. should gracefully retract on this bill and get state Govts. more actively involved in its support.
 JKGaur


Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 01:35:59 +0000
From: veke_ramanathan@yahoo.co.in
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] MISGIVINGS ON MODI GOVERNMENT'S LAND ACQUISITION BILL JUSTIFIED

well said, sir.a reverse process is required now. A NEW LAND ACQUISITION BILL-taking unutilised and not at all required industrial land and utilising it for establishing government agricultural farms.



On Monday, 16 March 2015 10:41 PM, S L Rao <raosl@hotmail.com> wrote:


Mr Venkatraman represents a view that does not recognise the abject poverty in which so many working in agriculture live. I agree that excess land with industry and particularly the public sector enterprises should be used for other industries. But it will not be enough. Literally hundreds of millions will move to urban areas over the next twenty years and occupations have to be found for them, primarily in industries. Roads, housing and other amenities are necessary if India is not to be one large slum. The land law will hurt some farmers and many will be exploited, but it is unavoidable. SLRao



On 15-Mar-2015, at 11:01 pm, Venkatraman Ns <nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com> wrote:

 To
India Against Corruption
                                                                 MISGIVINGS ON MODI GOVERNMENT'S LAND ACQUISITION BILL JUSTIFIED
 

There is the fundamental question as to whether taking away the agricultural land for setting up industry or housing projects is appropriate in a country like India,  which is essentially an agriculture oriented economy and  particularly when agriculture operations provide jobs to millions of people at unskilled and semi skilled level  in the densely populated country.  More than 75% of country's population constitute peasants and tribals, who have only traditional skill  in agricultural operations.
 
Modi government appears to think that industrial activity is as important as agricultural activity and converting some agricultural land for industrial projects is inevitable , if the country were to sustain economic growth to the desired level. Government further argues that it has put several safeguards to ensure that land acquisition would be for appropriate projects only  and will not result in undue benefit for corporate houses.
 
The question is whether Modi  government has exhausted all the options  for identifying  the available unutilized land for  industrial and development projects ,  that can avoid taking away the land from agricultural operations. One gets the impression that the government has not done this exercise adequately so far.

There are thousands of acres of industrial land presently occupied by many industries,  where only a portion of the land is utilized and other land remains unused. There are many sick projects which has been remaining closed with hundreds of acres of land that are not presently put to any use.   There are many  educational institutions with hundreds of acres of land , where only a few acres are utilized. There are also land where the  site is not suitable for agricultural operations. The government  is not known to have enumerated  such unutilized land available in the country. The government cannot say today that the country does not have such unutilized and wasted land.
Amongst the existing industries and in special economic zones , the government should conduct a land auditing to identify the unused land and force the industries  to give up such land for setting up new projects. This is possible.
The genuine question is why agricultural land should be taken away without putting the unutilized and  wasted land  for use for setting up industrial projects.
Should the interest of agriculture be sacrificed for the sake of industrial growth is a very valid question. People cannot live without food but they can live without cosmetics and automobiles.
Industrial growth should be complimentary to the agricultural growth and it cannot be allowed to become a substitute for agricultural growth even to a limited extent. Such move is bad in principle and contrary to the sentiments of large section of the country men.
Above all, the potentials for exploiting agricultural operations for India's economic growth with equanimity is no less than what industrial operations can achieve for the country.
Modi government appears to have erred in moving land acquisition bill.

N.S.Venkataraman
Nandini Voice For The Deprived
twitter : @nsvchennai


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Tuesday, March 17, 2015

[IAC#RG] FW: Delhi Election Results - Lets watch it together

For information of those who think I am criticising AAP for no reason.


Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 04:23:22 +0530
Subject: Re: Delhi Election Results - Lets watch it together
From: mailer@aamaadmiparty.org
To: gaurjk@hotmail.com

​
Dear Gaur K Ji,​

Sorry for the delay in our response . Thank you for your congratulatory message and kind good words .
 
Most humbly we acknowledge your kind all round support to AAP with gratitude and satisfaction  . 
 
We assure you  that AAP will leave no stone unturned to match peoples' expectations and will never let you down .
 
Our historic journey begins now. We request you to join us and together let us work harder for a better tomorrow.
 
Please stay in touch with us . We feel blessed and honoured with your association .
 
Warm Regards ,
Manas Ghosh
Team AAP

Connect with us on Social Network:
AAP National Page - www.facebook.com/AamAadmiParty
AAP website - http://aamaadmiparty.org/
AAP twitter - https://twitter.com/@aamaadmiparty
Party Help Line number: 09718500606 (9 A.M. to 9 P.M. - 7 days a week)

On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Gaur J K <gaurjk@hotmail.com> wrote:
Congratulations and best wishes for for the unprecedented and stupendous victory.
Look forward to your redeeming the poll promises made to common man during the next 5 years.
JKGaur

To: gaurjk@hotmail.com
Subject: Delhi Election Results - Lets watch it together
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 23:25:46 +0000
From: admin@aamaadmiparty.org


You are receiving this email because you have registered on our site as member, volunteer, donor, or subscriber. If you do not wish to receive email from us in the future please use the unsubscribe link at the end of this email.

​​
Dear Gaur K,
We will have a live hangout at 9.30 AM IST to provide live updates and
present the response of several contributors. Volunteer teams from al over the world, Delhi MLA candidates and AAP leaders will be
part of this hangout. Join us, it should be fun! 

Tune into http://myaap.in/hangout at 9.30 AM IST to listen to the
volunteers and leaders in the same hangout.

Delhi Election Results - Lets Watch is Together.
Date: February 10th 
Time: 9.30 AM IST
Watch Hangout Live at: http://myaap.in/hangout.
 
 
_____________________________________

AAP website - http://www.aamaadmiparty.org/
AAP Facebook : www.facebook.com/AamAadmiParty
AAP Twitter : https://twitter.com/AamAadmiParty
AAP NRI Contact: nri@aamaadmiparty.org

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------


In order to unsubscribe from this mailing list, please click here

Re: [IAC#RG] MISGIVINGS ON MODI GOVERNMENT’S LAND ACQUISITION BILL JUSTIFIED

What is unavoidable and who says that Wish you or other family members even held Nangar in hand So keep your arguments with people who can afford to buy suit worth Rs 4 cr 
 what' history teaches us when Naxals resorted to agitation  Land is only asset for farmer who neither has Diamond Shop or Kirana shops neither they have NSE card  Do not ignite them Find new ways to increase GDP and do not be in a hurry to prove Modi has performed wonders -Modi has 1 point agenda -which is backed by Adanis and ambanis as CM for 3 times he only saw Gujarat -not beyond .He rightly said during elections -Results of Delhi will reflect the mood of people -hope he has not forgotten

RAMESH PATIL



MRCI




On Monday, 16 March 2015 10:41 PM, S L Rao <raosl@hotmail.com> wrote:


Mr Venkatraman represents a view that does not recognise the abject poverty in which so many working in agriculture live. I agree that excess land with industry and particularly the public sector enterprises should be used for other industries. But it will not be enough. Literally hundreds of millions will move to urban areas over the next twenty years and occupations have to be found for them, primarily in industries. Roads, housing and other amenities are necessary if India is not to be one large slum. The land law will hurt some farmers and many will be exploited, but it is unavoidable. SLRao



On 15-Mar-2015, at 11:01 pm, Venkatraman Ns <nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com> wrote:

 To
India Against Corruption
                                                                 MISGIVINGS ON MODI GOVERNMENT'S LAND ACQUISITION BILL JUSTIFIED
 

There is the fundamental question as to whether taking away the agricultural land for setting up industry or housing projects is appropriate in a country like India,  which is essentially an agriculture oriented economy and  particularly when agriculture operations provide jobs to millions of people at unskilled and semi skilled level  in the densely populated country.  More than 75% of country's population constitute peasants and tribals, who have only traditional skill  in agricultural operations.
 
Modi government appears to think that industrial activity is as important as agricultural activity and converting some agricultural land for industrial projects is inevitable , if the country were to sustain economic growth to the desired level. Government further argues that it has put several safeguards to ensure that land acquisition would be for appropriate projects only  and will not result in undue benefit for corporate houses.
 
The question is whether Modi  government has exhausted all the options  for identifying  the available unutilized land for  industrial and development projects ,  that can avoid taking away the land from agricultural operations. One gets the impression that the government has not done this exercise adequately so far.

There are thousands of acres of industrial land presently occupied by many industries,  where only a portion of the land is utilized and other land remains unused. There are many sick projects which has been remaining closed with hundreds of acres of land that are not presently put to any use.   There are many  educational institutions with hundreds of acres of land , where only a few acres are utilized. There are also land where the  site is not suitable for agricultural operations. The government  is not known to have enumerated  such unutilized land available in the country. The government cannot say today that the country does not have such unutilized and wasted land.
Amongst the existing industries and in special economic zones , the government should conduct a land auditing to identify the unused land and force the industries  to give up such land for setting up new projects. This is possible.
The genuine question is why agricultural land should be taken away without putting the unutilized and  wasted land  for use for setting up industrial projects.
Should the interest of agriculture be sacrificed for the sake of industrial growth is a very valid question. People cannot live without food but they can live without cosmetics and automobiles.
Industrial growth should be complimentary to the agricultural growth and it cannot be allowed to become a substitute for agricultural growth even to a limited extent. Such move is bad in principle and contrary to the sentiments of large section of the country men.
Above all, the potentials for exploiting agricultural operations for India's economic growth with equanimity is no less than what industrial operations can achieve for the country.
Modi government appears to have erred in moving land acquisition bill.

N.S.Venkataraman
Nandini Voice For The Deprived
twitter : @nsvchennai


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in