Sunday, October 6, 2013

[HumJanenge] Re: CONSULTATIONS FOR RTI AMENDMENT

Dear Bhaskar

I really can't understand why you are so disappointed with the way things are going for your side. After holding up placards at railway platforms (like a good little Congress Party worker) why are you now crying ?

"I can only say please please please please please comment about the RTI amendment Bill otherwise you will be having a shock."

Enough said !!, We are not little children here :-

1) If RTI activists / so-called civil society had done nothing, Parliament would have passed the Bill, nothing would have changed and Political Parties would have continued to be under RTI - as they always were - and there would have been no "shock". BUT, as we all know it was never intended for that Bill to be passed at all - and we have dared them to pass that Bill.

2) We knew this because there are a bunch of PROFESSIONAL HARAMIs disguised as RTI activists in our midst - they are collectively called "NCPRI-Aruna". Nikhil Dey is the Convenor (because Aruna Roy is too old and discredited now) and you are a co-Convenor of this racket. Your grouping was promised a sweet deal by Digvijay Singh - generate 1 Lakh fake "signatures", meet the PM, meet the Minister, get social media buzz and paid media publicity, so that Rahul Baba will step in aggressively at last moment and save the day for "Young India".  RTI v2.0 will be the new "game changer" ushered in by Prince Charming - politics will be cleaned up using his new improved RTI vacuum cleaner MK-II personally designed in Italy (in other words trying to recreate 2004 all over again).

BUT, if you ultimately get cheated and Rahul Baba does not "Save RTI" like you were promised, please preserve this email so that future generations will recall who the Mir Jafars among us were.  

PS: Why were so many "NCPRI-Aruna" people attending Rahul's PR training camps for Congress workers ?

Sarbajit
Convenor NCPRI
www.ncpri.org

DISCLAIMER: "Young India" does not refer to any Rahul Gandhi linked corporation which gobbles up prime property in Delhi like National Herald building at throwaway prices.


On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Bhaskar Prabhu <mahitiadhikarmanch@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Friends,
>
> Please enquire with GAD of your state when is the Public Consultation of Standing Committee on RTI Amendment.
>
> The circular of DoPT is dated 25-09-13 to state's and state is calling the stake holders. The Maharashtra state invited myself and Vijay Kumbhar, I also called Dolphy D'Sousa and Sudhir Badami to come for this consultation.
>
> The political parties representatives were also called for the meeting.The meeting was held in Hotel Trident !! I cannot disclose of proceedings as there is OFFICIAL technical restriction of talking about the proceedings.
>
> I can only say please please please please please comment about the RTI amendment Bill otherwise you will be having a shock.
>
> We have put forwarded very strongly and cleared to all standing committee members about their apprehension, doubts, fears, apprehension of harassment etc of political parties for coming under RTI Act. I vehemently opposed the RTI Amendment with reasons of various court judgements HC to SC and various citations.  I feel any person who has concern for the RTI Act request them to pro-actively demand participation in such type consultation in your respective states, ALSO GO WITH PREPARED KNOWLEDGE INPUTS, JUST DON'T EXPRESS EMOTIONS. Otherwise DoPT and Standing Committee will wind-off consultation technically.
>
> They are having next in Tamil Nadu, Rajastan, Delhi.  I CAN ONLY SAY THE WAY I HAVE VEHEMENTLY PUT FORWARDED OUR POINTS TO STANDING COMMITTEE MEMBERS THEY WILL NOT FORGET MY NAME OR MAHITI ADHIKAR MANCH. I request all not to take this matter as easy, please submit your submissions in any language though the advertisement says in Hindi or English, for which I objected to Standing Committee, they agreed to take comments in any official 21 languages, I don't know whether they have recorded this and will put in practise. I am disclosing this (I hope standing committee should not have objection) as this will increase participation in democracy from all section, class and creed of people this country.
>
> ZINDABAD ZINDABAD ZINDABAD
>
>
> Yours in service of RTI
>
> Bhaskar Prabhu
> Convenor
> Mahiti Adhikar Manch &
> Maharashtra RTI Council
> Co Convenor NCPRI
> 9892102424


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "HumJanenge Forum People's Right to Information, RTI Act 2005" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to HumJanenge+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

[rti4empowerment] Re: CONSULTATIONS FOR RTI AMENDMENT

Dear Bhaskar

I really can't understand why you are so disappointed with the way things are going for your side. After holding up placards at railway platforms (like a good little Congress Party worker) why are you now crying ?

"I can only say please please please please please comment about the RTI amendment Bill otherwise you will be having a shock."

Enough said !!, We are not little children here :-

1) If RTI activists / so-called civil society had done nothing, Parliament would have passed the Bill, nothing would have changed and Political Parties would have continued to be under RTI - as they always were - and there would have been no "shock". BUT, as we all know it was never intended for that Bill to be passed at all - and we have dared them to pass that Bill.

2) We knew this because there are a bunch of PROFESSIONAL HARAMIs disguised as RTI activists in our midst - they are collectively called "NCPRI-Aruna". Nikhil Dey is the Convenor (because Aruna Roy is too old and discredited now) and you are a co-Convenor of this racket. Your grouping was promised a sweet deal by Digvijay Singh - generate 1 Lakh fake "signatures", meet the PM, meet the Minister, get social media buzz and paid media publicity, so that Rahul Baba will step in aggressively at last moment and save the day for "Young India".  RTI v2.0 will be the new "game changer" ushered in by Prince Charming - politics will be cleaned up using his new improved RTI vacuum cleaner MK-II personally designed in Italy (in other words trying to recreate 2004 all over again).

BUT, if you ultimately get cheated and Rahul Baba does not "Save RTI" like you were promised, please preserve this email so that future generations will recall who the Mir Jafars among us were.  

PS: Why were so many "NCPRI-Aruna" people attending Rahul's PR training camps for Congress workers ?

Sarbajit
Convenor NCPRI
www.ncpri.org

DISCLAIMER: "Young India" does not refer to any Rahul Gandhi linked corporation which gobbles up prime property in Delhi like National Herald building at throwaway prices.


On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Bhaskar Prabhu <mahitiadhikarmanch@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Friends,
>
> Please enquire with GAD of your state when is the Public Consultation of Standing Committee on RTI Amendment.
>
> The circular of DoPT is dated 25-09-13 to state's and state is calling the stake holders. The Maharashtra state invited myself and Vijay Kumbhar, I also called Dolphy D'Sousa and Sudhir Badami to come for this consultation.
>
> The political parties representatives were also called for the meeting.The meeting was held in Hotel Trident !! I cannot disclose of proceedings as there is OFFICIAL technical restriction of talking about the proceedings.
>
> I can only say please please please please please comment about the RTI amendment Bill otherwise you will be having a shock.
>
> We have put forwarded very strongly and cleared to all standing committee members about their apprehension, doubts, fears, apprehension of harassment etc of political parties for coming under RTI Act. I vehemently opposed the RTI Amendment with reasons of various court judgements HC to SC and various citations.  I feel any person who has concern for the RTI Act request them to pro-actively demand participation in such type consultation in your respective states, ALSO GO WITH PREPARED KNOWLEDGE INPUTS, JUST DON'T EXPRESS EMOTIONS. Otherwise DoPT and Standing Committee will wind-off consultation technically.
>
> They are having next in Tamil Nadu, Rajastan, Delhi.  I CAN ONLY SAY THE WAY I HAVE VEHEMENTLY PUT FORWARDED OUR POINTS TO STANDING COMMITTEE MEMBERS THEY WILL NOT FORGET MY NAME OR MAHITI ADHIKAR MANCH. I request all not to take this matter as easy, please submit your submissions in any language though the advertisement says in Hindi or English, for which I objected to Standing Committee, they agreed to take comments in any official 21 languages, I don't know whether they have recorded this and will put in practise. I am disclosing this (I hope standing committee should not have objection) as this will increase participation in democracy from all section, class and creed of people this country.
>
> ZINDABAD ZINDABAD ZINDABAD
>
>
> Yours in service of RTI
>
> Bhaskar Prabhu
> Convenor
> Mahiti Adhikar Manch &
> Maharashtra RTI Council
> Co Convenor NCPRI
> 9892102424


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "INDIA RTI for empowerment" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rti4empowerment+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: [IAC#RG] PUBLIC GRIEAVANCE: Is Mr. Rajan the Governor of RBI or not ?

Dear Sarabjit

I've located one of Dr Rajanish Dass's papers shredding UIDAI. Brilliant !
http://www.iimahd.ernet.in/assets/snippets/workingpaperpdf/5463926942011-03-04.pdf

It's small wonder he had to be taken out of IIM-Ahmedabad for writing
this considering that Narayan Murthy started his career as chief
programmer at IIMA and was also Chairman of the IIMA Board.

UIDAI is shaping up to be the mother of scams to milk the Indian state
and prop up the tottering over-priced Indian IT industry which is in
dire straits now and unable to compete against the likes of Vietnam,
Philipines and the former COMECON states. IIMA and RBI are the nerve
centre of this national ripoff.

Raminder

On 10/6/13, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> *CONFIDENTIAL*
>
> Dear Rajiv,
>
> I wasn't expecting any reply from RBI as this has the potential of becoming
> a major problem for them.
>
> There is still some doubt if Mr. Rajan is a US "national" or a US
> "citizen". It seems that all US citizens are US nationals, but all US
> nationals are not US citizens. Some US nationals can have Indian passports.
>
> So, whereas RBI (by a press release) may publish that Rajan is RBI
> Governor, they may have some difficulty certifying that under RTI.
>
> A similar problem has apparently also arisen in IIM-Ahmedabad, where some
> Prof Ashish Nanda (a tenured professor from Harvard) has been appointed as
> Director after the Institute's Memorandum of Association and Rules were
> specifically modified on 17.02.2013 to allow him to be appointed by
> bypassing the usual Government scrutinies. (IIM-A has just uploaded their
> amended MoA/Rules under section 4/RTI on 03.10.2013 after I complained to
> the Dean Ajay Pande.)
>
> All these US returned persons are being appointed to key posts in
> Government to facilitate the UIDAI scam - which is going to be the mother
> of all scams. Its interesting that a key person in IIM Ahmedabad - Dr.
> Rajanish Dass - who was a consistent critic of UIDAI (and published some
> serious research papers from IIM-A exposing UIDAI) was forced to resign
> after the CIA's dirty tricks department circulated sophisticated forged
> emails allegedly from his Gmail accounts in what is known as "IIM-A
> plagiarism scam", and these forged emails effectively knocked all the
> Indian contenders out of the race for IIMA directorship. The IIM's are the
> intellectual centre of the UIDAI scam, and there is a tremendous
> commonality now between IIM-A's Board of Governors /members and that of the
> Reserve Bank's Board (please dig into this).
>
> Sarbajit

Re: [IAC#RG] PUBLIC GRIEAVANCE: Is Mr. Rajan the Governor of RBI or not ?

CONFIDENTIAL

Dear Rajiv,

I wasn't expecting any reply from RBI as this has the potential of becoming a major problem for them.

There is still some doubt if Mr. Rajan is a US "national"  or a US "citizen". It seems that all US citizens are US nationals, but all US nationals are not US citizens. Some US nationals can have Indian passports.

So, whereas RBI (by a press release) may publish that Rajan is RBI Governor, they may have some difficulty certifying that under RTI.

A similar problem has apparently also arisen in IIM-Ahmedabad, where some Prof Ashish Nanda (a tenured professor from Harvard) has been appointed as Director after the Institute's Memorandum of Association and Rules were specifically modified on 17.02.2013 to allow him to be appointed by bypassing the usual Government scrutinies. (IIM-A has just uploaded their amended MoA/Rules under section 4/RTI on 03.10.2013 after I complained to the Dean Ajay Pande.)

All these US returned persons are being appointed to key posts in Government to facilitate the UIDAI scam - which is going to be the mother of all scams. Its interesting that a key person in IIM Ahmedabad - Dr. Rajanish Dass - who was a consistent critic of UIDAI (and published some serious research papers from IIM-A exposing UIDAI) was forced to resign after the CIA's dirty tricks department circulated sophisticated forged emails allegedly from his Gmail accounts in what is known as "IIM-A plagiarism scam", and these forged emails effectively knocked all the Indian contenders out of the race for IIMA directorship. The IIM's are the intellectual centre of the UIDAI scam, and there is a tremendous commonality now between IIM-A's Board of Governors /members and that of the Reserve Bank's Board (please dig into this).

Sarbajit


On 10/6/13, India News <indianewsco@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Mr Roy
>
> cc: Alpana Killawala (RBI)
>
> Have you received any reply to this email from RBI ?
> The RTI disclosure of RBI continues to list D.Subbarao as RBI Governor.
>
> Rajeev
> Indianewsco

Re: [IAC#RG] PUBLIC GRIEAVANCE: Is Mr. Rajan the Governor of RBI or not ?

I need to lodge a complaint / alert to the RBI but cannot find its email address on its website. Could someone please tell me RBI and its Governor Mr. Raghuram Rajan email addresses. Thanks.

Victor



From: India News <indianewsco@gmail.com>
To: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
Cc: alpanakillawala@rbi.org.in; Debashis Basu <editor@moneylife.in>; indiaresists <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Sent: Saturday, October 5, 2013 10:08 PM
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] PUBLIC GRIEAVANCE: Is Mr. Rajan the Governor of RBI or not ?

Dear Mr Roy

cc: Alpana Killawala (RBI)
 
Have you received any reply to this email from RBI ?
The RTI disclosure of RBI continues to list D.Subbarao as RBI Governor.

Rajeev
Indianewsco



On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
To:
Mrs. Alpana Indrajit Killawalla
PRESS RELEASE OFFICER
Reserve Bank of India

Monday, 30-Sept-2013

Dear Madam

On behalf of the Adi Dharm religion, and thereby on behalf of about 6.47 million registered voters, I am greatly troubled to learn from the online media like MoneyLife.in and IndiaNewsCo.com that Mr. Raghuram Rajan, who has still not been appointed as RBI Governor, has apparently started issuing atrocious instructions (without any authority) to compulsorily install bio-metric ATMs in Banks which shall result in my flock being compulsorily fingerprinted and which so far we have refused to do on religious grounds as conscientious objectors.

FYI, as per the information today on RBI website, the RBI Governor is one Dr. D Subbarao, who incidentally had steadfastly refused to make UIDAI mandatory in banking sector (please see)
http://rbi.org.in/Scripts/righttoinfoact.aspx
linking to
http://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/content/docs/201103.xls
(as downloaded today and attached for your ready reference and records)

We are also scandalised by the several other rumors circulating in Delhi's power corridors of RBI's outrageous decisions to facilitate compulsory fingerprinting given soon after Mr. Rajan entered RBI, and Mr Rajan is by some accounts an American citizen, for promptly decreeing biometric Bank ATMs so some handpicked US based companies will be favoured in a massive purchase scandal running into about Rs. 36,000 crores and pursuant to which Mr Rajan has allegedly been initially bribed about Euro 50,000 routed from a German Bank under the garb of some fake award.

In view of the aforesaid allegations and rumours which are greatly troubling my co-religionists, I would request you to kindly clarify the correct position so that Adi Dharm Council can communicate the same to our children. We would be obliged if the same can be done by return email to me and by 6:00 PM on 5-Oct-2013 in any case, beyond which we are not interested in knowing your answer.

With best wishes

Er. Sarbajit Roy
'Upacharya'
and Hony.National Convenor
India Against Corruption, jan andolan

B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024

Tel : 09311448069


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

[HumJanenge] Fwd: Personal Memorandum on RTI Amendment Bill 2013

To: rs-cpers@sansad.nic.in, sahoo.ak@sansad.nic.in, Shantaram Naik <shantaramgoa@gmail.com>
To:
The Parliamentary Standing Committee on
Personnel, Public Grievances, Law and Justice

Date: 6-Oct-2013

Sirs,

By EMAIL

Memorandum

I refer to the public notice dt. 21.09.2013 inviting memorandum from the public on the subject Bill.

I would be obliged if the Hon'ble Committee  will take on record and consider my below listed brief personal submissions, submitted as a directly affected citizen of India.

1) That I am reliably informed the Hon'ble Committee has accepted and commenced processing some public representations submitted in advance of the aforesaid public notice. I therefore object that this practice (to favour some vested interests) is grossly violative of the Constitutional guarantee of EQUALITY  - of STATUS and of OPPORTUNITY - summarised in the preamble to the Constitution of India. I further object that the principle of "Parliamentary Privilege" is being invoked to pull a veil of secrecy over such goings on.

2) That I am reliably informed the CIC's decision of 03.06.2013 is a political decision stage managed (down to its timing and its drafting by the lawyer for the appellant) in collusion with the "Aam Aadmi Party" to project that having political parties under RTI is a "game changer" which shall reform the present rotten system.

3) That having political parties under RTI regime shall hardly achieve anything worthwhile for political reform until the Representation of People's Act is itself amended simultaneously to ensure that Political Parties are mandated to maintain and keep detailed records of all aspects of their functioning - especially their internal functioning.

4) That proper public consultations must be held to determine the list(s) of records  - preferably in prescribed proformas -  which every registered political party is mandated in Law to maintain and which must be made available to the electors to enable them to make informed electoral choices with scientific temper.

5) That the under-pinning of this exercise must be the recognition  that the RP Act is a fountain head of corruption in India and and its creatures (Political Parties) are the  visible heads of the Hydra.

NB: I desire to appear in person to present my oral evidence.

Yours faithfully,

Er. Sarbajit Roy

B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024

Tel: 09311448069


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "HumJanenge Forum People's Right to Information, RTI Act 2005" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to HumJanenge+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

[IAC#RG] Fwd: Personal Memorandum on RTI Amendment Bill 2013

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 1:06 PM
Subject: Personal Memorandum on RTI Amendment Bill 2013
To: rs-cpers@sansad.nic.in, sahoo.ak@sansad.nic.in, Shantaram Naik <shantaramgoa@gmail.com>
To:
The Parliamentary Standing Committee on
Personnel, Public Grievances, Law and Justice

Date: 6-Oct-2013

Sirs,

By EMAIL

Memorandum

I refer to the public notice dt. 21.09.2013 inviting memorandum from the public on the subject Bill.

I would be obliged if the Hon'ble Committee  will take on record and consider my below listed brief personal submissions, submitted as a directly affected citizen of India.

1) That I am reliably informed the Hon'ble Committee has accepted and commenced processing some public representations submitted in advance of the aforesaid public notice. I therefore object that this practice (to favour some vested interests) is grossly violative of the Constitutional guarantee of EQUALITY  - of STATUS and of OPPORTUNITY - summarised in the preamble to the Constitution of India. I further object that the principle of "Parliamentary Privilege" is being invoked to pull a veil of secrecy over such goings on.

2) That I am reliably informed the CIC's decision of 03.06.2013 is a political decision stage managed (down to its timing and its drafting by the lawyer for the appellant) in collusion with the "Aam Aadmi Party" to project that having political parties under RTI is a "game changer" which shall reform the present rotten system.

3) That having political parties under RTI regime shall hardly achieve anything worthwhile for political reform until the Representation of People's Act is itself amended simultaneously to ensure that Political Parties are mandated to maintain and keep detailed records of all aspects of their functioning - especially their internal functioning.

4) That proper public consultations must be held to determine the list(s) of records  - preferably in prescribed proformas -  which every registered political party is mandated in Law to maintain and which must be made available to the electors to enable them to make informed electoral choices with scientific temper.

5) That the under-pinning of this exercise must be the recognition  that the RP Act is a fountain head of corruption in India and and its creatures (Political Parties) are the  visible heads of the Hydra.

NB: I desire to appear in person to present my oral evidence.

Yours faithfully,

Er. Sarbajit Roy

B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024

Tel: 09311448069