Re: [IAC#RG] Online Request/Grievance registration in President's Secretariat Helpline

great work
 

thanks and regard 

amandeep singh 

president sawo

www.saworg.com

9316929321

On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

IMPORTANT UPDATE

The Govt has just moved an Amendment Bill to the Prevention of Corruption Act 2013 yesterday in Rajya Sabha.

Ostensibly it seeks to set the time to grant sanction for prosecution to 3 months. In actuality it removes the right of a citizen to move a private complaint, and make it more difficult to prosecute retired public servants for corrupt acts committed by them in office.

I am happy to say that UPA Govt  were forced to move it because after the decision in Subramaniam Swamy's SLP of Oct 2012, my own corruption complaint (see below) landed on MoS/DoPT's desk.

On 28.April.2013 I had asked the President of India ("Central Govt") for permission to prosecute Ajit Kr. Seth -Cabinet Secy. and also other officers on the "Screening Committee" which short listed 3 Information Commissioners last year in a grossly corrupt manner. (These posts are being sold and the bribe to be appointed as an IC was Rs. 2 crore in instance of an initially rejected candidate who was later selected).

The Vineet Narain judgment had settled that the time for the Competent Authority to give sanction to prosecute is 3 months plus 1 month where the AG's opinion is requested. My complaint is with MoS/DoPT (Narayanswamy) for 3 months now and the notings on it are that only an Amendment Bill to avert/overcome SC's finding (that Prevention of Corruption Act does not rule out prosecution on private complaint) can cut my complaint/request.

Hence the present Amendment Bill moved in Rajya Sabha which does just that. The files in my DoPT cases also have a remarkable propensity of doing the disappearing act.

Sarbajit

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 11:16 AM
Subject: Online Request/Grievance registration in President's Secretariat Helpline

To: indiaresists <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>

From: <helpline@rb.nic.in>
Date: Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 10:47 AM
Subject: Online Request/Grievance registration in President's Secretariat Helpline

Dear Sir/Madam,

Your Request/Grievance has been registered vide Registration number PRSEC/E/2013/06052 .Please quote the same in your future correspondance.

Note: This is a system generated mail. Please do not reply it.

I am aggrieved as follows:-

1) That I had formally lodged a Public Grievance duly registered at no. CABST/E/2012/00216 on 26.06.2012 on the Central Govt web portal www.pgportal.nic.in.

2) That my grievance was specifically directed against certain misconduct of Mr. Ajit Kr. Seth the present Union Cabinet Secretary.

3) That whereas the time to dispose of the registered Public Grievances is 2 months, in my case it is lying unattended for over 9 months now.

4) That I am caused to say that my Public Grievance is unattended due to the specific allegations I have made therein concerning the role of Mr. Ajit Kr Seth in corruptly manipulating the appointment and selection of Central Information Commissioners in the Central Information Commission.

5) That I have been regularly following up and representing for my aforesaid Public Grievance to be resolved, however, Mr. Ajit Kr. Seth has been interfering to see that no action is taken. My latest communication dt. 21.04.2013 to Shri Alok Chaturvedi (Jt. Secretary/Cabinet Secretariat) has also been ignored.

6) That I am a directly affected person in the matter since I was one of the 214 persons who applied for the said post, and that my eminence, qualifications and suitability for the post(s) cannot be denied vis-a-vis / over the candidates actually appointed. However, as an honest person I did not agree for / employ the usual bribes / dishonesties to advance my cause.

7) That in the circumstances I must PRAY that I either be appointed as a Central Information Commissioner (4 posts for which are still vacant) or that I be given the statutory permission / approval to prosecute Mr. Ajit Kr. Seth for corruption and other offences.

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Re: [IAC#RG] Online Request/Grievance registration in President's Secretariat Helpline

IMPORTANT UPDATE

The Govt has just moved an Amendment Bill to the Prevention of Corruption Act 2013 yesterday in Rajya Sabha.

Ostensibly it seeks to set the time to grant sanction for prosecution to 3 months. In actuality it removes the right of a citizen to move a private complaint, and make it more difficult to prosecute retired public servants for corrupt acts committed by them in office.

I am happy to say that UPA Govt  were forced to move it because after the decision in Subramaniam Swamy's SLP of Oct 2012, my own corruption complaint (see below) landed on MoS/DoPT's desk.

On 28.April.2013 I had asked the President of India ("Central Govt") for permission to prosecute Ajit Kr. Seth -Cabinet Secy. and also other officers on the "Screening Committee" which short listed 3 Information Commissioners last year in a grossly corrupt manner. (These posts are being sold and the bribe to be appointed as an IC was Rs. 2 crore in instance of an initially rejected candidate who was later selected).

The Vineet Narain judgment had settled that the time for the Competent Authority to give sanction to prosecute is 3 months plus 1 month where the AG's opinion is requested. My complaint is with MoS/DoPT (Narayanswamy) for 3 months now and the notings on it are that only an Amendment Bill to avert/overcome SC's finding (that Prevention of Corruption Act does not rule out prosecution on private complaint) can cut my complaint/request.

Hence the present Amendment Bill moved in Rajya Sabha which does just that. The files in my DoPT cases also have a remarkable propensity of doing the disappearing act.

Sarbajit

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 11:16 AM
Subject: Online Request/Grievance registration in President's Secretariat Helpline

To: indiaresists <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>

From: <helpline@rb.nic.in>
Date: Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 10:47 AM
Subject: Online Request/Grievance registration in President's Secretariat Helpline

Dear Sir/Madam,

Your Request/Grievance has been registered vide Registration number PRSEC/E/2013/06052 .Please quote the same in your future correspondance.

Note: This is a system generated mail. Please do not reply it.

I am aggrieved as follows:-

1) That I had formally lodged a Public Grievance duly registered at no. CABST/E/2012/00216 on 26.06.2012 on the Central Govt web portal www.pgportal.nic.in.

2) That my grievance was specifically directed against certain misconduct of Mr. Ajit Kr. Seth the present Union Cabinet Secretary.

3) That whereas the time to dispose of the registered Public Grievances is 2 months, in my case it is lying unattended for over 9 months now.

4) That I am caused to say that my Public Grievance is unattended due to the specific allegations I have made therein concerning the role of Mr. Ajit Kr Seth in corruptly manipulating the appointment and selection of Central Information Commissioners in the Central Information Commission.

5) That I have been regularly following up and representing for my aforesaid Public Grievance to be resolved, however, Mr. Ajit Kr. Seth has been interfering to see that no action is taken. My latest communication dt. 21.04.2013 to Shri Alok Chaturvedi (Jt. Secretary/Cabinet Secretariat) has also been ignored.

6) That I am a directly affected person in the matter since I was one of the 214 persons who applied for the said post, and that my eminence, qualifications and suitability for the post(s) cannot be denied vis-a-vis / over the candidates actually appointed. However, as an honest person I did not agree for / employ the usual bribes / dishonesties to advance my cause.

7) That in the circumstances I must PRAY that I either be appointed as a Central Information Commissioner (4 posts for which are still vacant) or that I be given the statutory permission / approval to prosecute Mr. Ajit Kr. Seth for corruption and other offences.

[IAC#RG] Fwd: CLARIFICATION

Sarabjit

Here is yet another "co-convenor" of NCPRI to add to your list.

His name is also not on NCPRI's website as a co-convenor.

Raminder

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Bhaskar Prabhu <mahitiadhikarmanch@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 6:36 AM
Subject: Fwd: CLARIFICATION
To: rtitrainers <rtitrainers@googlegroups.com>

FYI

Bhaskar Prabhu

Co Convenor

NCPRI

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: NCPRI India <ncpri.india@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 2:41 PM
Subject: CLARIFICATION
To: ncpri wc <ncpriworkingcommittee@googlegroups.com>

CLARIFICATION

 

This is to clarify that the NCPRI has neither issued any statement demanding the appointment of RTI activists as Information Commissioners nor has it authorised any person to issue such a statement. The email with the subject line: "SAVE RTI Appoint activists as CIC Information Commissioners" sent via email id: ncpri2004@yahoo.co.in, mentioning one of our members - Ms. Amrita Johri, is not only fraudulent but also mischievous. The official email id of NCPRI is ncpri.india@gmail.com. We request readers to check with us first whenever they receive such fraudulent messages.

Please circulate this clarification amongst your networks to avoid any confusion or misunderstanding about the NCPRI.

 

Nikhil Dey, Anjali Bhardwaj & Venkatesh Nayak

(Co-convenors of the NCPRI)

--
National Campaign for People's Right to Information
Email: ncpri.india@gmail.com
www.righttoinformation.info

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NCPRIworkingcommittee" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ncpriworkingcommittee+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--

Yours in service of RTI

Bhaskar Prabhu
Convenor
Mahiti Adhikar Manch
9892102424

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Information is a source of learning. But unless it is organized, processed, and available to the right people in a format for decision making, it is a burden, not a benefit."
William Pollard quotes

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "RTI Trainers Forum" group.
To post to this group, send email to rtitrainers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rtitrainers+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.co.in/group/rtitrainers?hl=en-GB
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RTI Trainers Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtitrainers+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: [IAC#RG] Rajaji's views on amendment to nullify Supreme Court verdict

No, inIndia Parliament is not supreme as in UK; in India Constitution is supreme, Parliament as judiciary is only one wing of the Constitution.

 

V. S. Sardesai

From: "devinder.thakur@btopenworld.com" <devinder.thakur@btopenworld.com>
To: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Sent: Sunday, 18 August 2013 11:47 PM
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Rajaji's views on amendment to nullify Supreme Court verdict

Of course the Parliament is the supreme body. The judiciary is independent but does not make laws but interprets them, and makes sure that they are applied correctly. The recent SC judgement was seen as somewhat judicial overreach, although from the point of view of public good the suggested law would appear to be correct but the Political parties did not take it kindly and want to change it through some amendment to the existing laws. All party are united in this matter.

 

I hope this answers your question adeqyately.  Devinder

From: Gopalarao ganugapati <gvgrao33@gmail.com>
To: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Sent: Sunday, 18 August 2013, 17:46
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Rajaji's views on amendment to nullify Supreme Court verdict

The eternal question is whether supreme court or the parliament is superior. Can any of our friends answer this?

On Sunday, August 18, 2013, Venkatraman Ns <nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com> wrote:
>  To
>
> India Against Corruption
>
>                   Rajaji's views on amendment to nullify Supreme Court verdict           
>
>  
>
> The move of the parliamentarians to make amendment  to ensure that Supreme Court's verdict barring convicted persons from entering parliament and assemblies  is causing concern to citizens who want probity in public life.
>
> Rajaji, the foresighted statesman  wrote an article titled "Lawless Legislation" in Swarajya  dated 14th September,1963, disapproving the tendency of parliamentarians to undo the verdict of Supreme Court.  The extract  from  Rajaji's article  is given below.
>
> The President and Prime Minister as well as the leader of the opposition in Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha should read this and derive the right lessons.
>
>   QUOTE                                             LAWLESS  LEGISLATION
>
> Laws passed contrary to fundamental principles of law have been called  `lawless‟ laws. When they are contrary not only to fundamental principles but to  the express Articles of the Constitution embodying them, they are still more lawless.
>
> And the climax of lawlessness is reached, when the law actually seeks to amend the  Constitution itself, in order to bring it into line with itself. The lawlessness is  aggravated by a spirit of open rebellion against the Constitution.
>
> The Constitution has, no doubt, laid down procedure for amending the Constitution.  To utilize those provisions in order to legalize what is contrary to the intent and  purpose of the Articles relating to fundamental – that is, inviolable – basic rights is to use the letter of the Constitution to defeat the Constitution itself and to "make  faith void and sacred promises of none effect".
>
> These rights embodied in the Constitution are called fundamental, because they are  not rights newly conferred on the citizen by the State but are a recognition and  confirmation of freedom coeval with birth in a civilized country.
>
> If each time the Supreme Court gives an adverse verdict against the Government in  respect of the validity of a law passed at its instance, the Government organize a  constitutional amendment to be steam rolled  though  Parliament in order to make the  judicial pronouncement of none effect.
>
> In the process, the image of the Supreme Court is bound to lose all public respect.  Supreme Court will ultimately lose its own sense of confidence and independence. It  is superfluous to point out that this is against the spirit and structure of the Constitution.
>
> UNQUOTE
>
> N.S.Venkataraman
>
> Nandini Voice For The Deprived
>
> Email :- nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com
>

--

G.V.Gopalarao,BA,BE,DIIT,MIE
Professional Engineer (IEI)

26/378A,Buttaipeta.

Machilipatnam,521001

INDIA.

Phone: Landline 91 8672 221315

Cell:7893935473 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in/

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in/

Re: [IAC#RG] Fwd: [HumJanenge] SAVE RTI Appoint RTI activists as CIC Information Commissioners

Dear NCPRI

Further to my previous email, we can't find any mention of any Amrita Johri as being a member of NCPRI on your website. Also only 2 of the signatories to the Clarificatory email are shown as "co-convenors" of NCPRI and there is no mention in this email of either "Angela Rangad (angelarangad@hotmail.com ) or "Ramakrishna Raju (brkraju5@gmail.com )" who are the other co-convenors.

http://righttoinformation.info/about-us/campaign-committee/
http://righttoinformation.info/about-us/working-committee-members/

So the question is who is Amrita Johri and in what capacity is she operating the "ncpri2004@yahoo.co.in" email account. HJ cannot really delve into somebody's internal affairs to check each each and every email sent to our lists.

With such kind of transparency on NCPRI's own website, IAC really fails to see with what face NCPRI can demand suo-moto transparency from parties like the Congress or the CPIM whose own websites are very detailed and up-to-date.

Sarbajit

On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear NCPRI

The email from "ncpri2004@yahoo.co.in" to this IAC list was forwarded from Humjanenge@googlegroups.com. From what we can make out it was sent from "ncpri2004@yahoo.co.in" by somebody in South Africa using a Vodafone Blackberry which was forwarded from the website http:saverti.webege.com (hosted on hostinger.com) ip address "31.170.164.137". This website "webege.com" is on the URI blacklist and is used for all sorts of email scams.

Since "ncpri2004@yahoo.co.in" was definitely an official NCPRI email address (do a google search) and has been on our (HJ's) mailing list for donkeys years, please see if your account has been hacked so that we may delete it to prevent such episodes in future.

BTW: What is NCPRI's position, if any, on appointment of ex-Bureaucrats as ICs in general, and the appointment of either P.K.Misra or one of the senior serving ICs as Chief Information Commissioners without any advt./notice specifically.

Sarbajit

On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 2:38 PM, NCPRI India <ncpri.india@gmail.com> wrote:

CLARIFICATION

 

This is to clarify that the NCPRI has neither issued any statement demanding the appointment of RTI activists as Information Commissioners nor has it authorised any person to issue such a statement. The email with the subject line: "SAVE RTI Appoint activists as CIC Information Commissioners" sent via email id: ncpri2004@yahoo.co.in, mentioning one of our members - Ms. Amrita Johri, is not only fraudulent but also mischievous. The official email id of NCPRI is ncpri.india@gmail.com. We request readers to check with us first whenever they receive such fraudulent messages.

Please circulate this clarification amongst your networks to avoid any confusion or misunderstanding about the NCPRI.

 

Nikhil Dey, Anjali Bhardwaj & Venkatesh Nayak

(Co-convenors of the NCPRI)

On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Raminder Singh <ramisingh.bbc@gmail.com> wrote:

Amrita,

The tip on RaiSinha is actually 4 months under India's first woman Chief Information Commissioner, with PKM getting in for now as an IC like ANT did ?

RS "Raminder" Pabbi

On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 2:57 PM, NCPRI INDIA <ncpri2004@yahoo.co.in> wrote:

To Dear all,

 

15 August 2013

 

The National Campaign for Peoples' Right to Information (NCPRI) supports the popular demand expressed by Anna Hazare that selections for 5 approved posts for Central Information Commissioners, including Chief Information Commissioner, be only filled from those applicants who are not from the category "widely experienced in administration and governance", which category has been garnering a disproportionately excessive share in such posts.

 

Thank you,

 

Amrita Johri

 

9810273984

 

(On behalf of the NCPRI)

 

-- National Campaign for People's Right to Information

 

Email: ncpri.india@gmail.com

 

www.righttoinformation.info

 

In reply to

 

Dear all RTI activists

 

The Govt and BJP have already decided that Pradeep Kumar Mishra will be appointed as next Chief Information Commissioner.

We request all RTI activists to join Anna's Save RTI campaign.

Please reply to this email with your details like name address and mobile.

RTI activists please submit their names, mobile and address for Anna's Save RTI campaign. on this online form also if you are not member of any mailing list

Next CIC P.K.Misra - Secretary DoPT

The Govt and BJP have decided that Pradeep Kumar Mishra will be appointed as next Chief Information Commissioner. They have taken this decision without issuing any notice or seeking applications for the post. Govt. only wants pliable person in such sensitive positions who know the tricks by which one ex-government officer will help another government officer to escape from giving information. A person who will never impose penalty on the bureaucracy so that he will keep his posh bungalow in Delhi after retirement. Pradeep Kumar Mishra is such a person and it is fixed with Sushma Swaraj that he will be sent to the Central Information Commission. GOD SAVE RTI

On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

1) The online form is not working

2) In terms of Oct.18 2012 agreement, please do not use "India Against Corruption" wording under Anna's photo's

3) Who is Anna Hazare to select a panel of 5 names ?

 

On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:33 PM, join bvga <joinbvga@gmail.com> wrote:

PLEASE  ADD  YOUR  NAME

Reply to his email or fill the online form

SAVE RTI Appoint RTI activists as CIC Information Commissioners

Save-RTI, stop DoPT secretly appointing only retired babus to Central Information Commission.

ANNA HAZARE APPEALS to INDIA

ANNA HAZARE says only citizens can save RTI now.
ANNA HAZARE says VOTE OUT BOTH Congress and the BJP unless all 5 Information Commissioners appointed now are RTI activists.

Next CIC P.K.Misra - Secretary DoPT

The Govt and BJP have decided that Pradeep Kumar Mishra will be appointed as next Chief Information Commissioner. They have taken this decision without issuing any notice or seeking applications for the post. Govt. only wants pliable person in such sensitive positions who know the tricks by which one ex-government officer will help another government officer to escape from goving information. A person who will never impose penalty on the bureaucracy so that he will get his posh bungalow in Delhi after retirement. Pradeep Kumar Mishra is such a person and it is fixed with Sushma Swaraj that he will be sent to the Central Information Commission. GOD SAVE RTI

What can citizen do to save RTI?

Section 12(5)of RTI Act
"The Chief Information Commissioner and Information Commissioners shall be persons of eminence in public life with wide knowledge and experience in law, science and technology, social service, management, journalism, mass media or administration and governance".This does not mean that only Babus can be appointed

India's War Against Corruption will only succeed if honest persons experienced in fighting against corruption for years and who know the tricks of bureaucracy to deny information are appointed to the Information Commission. Anna has prepared a panel list of 5 such honest activist persons to send it to PM and demand that they and only they be appointed.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "INDIA RTI for empowerment" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rti4empowerment+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "HumJanenge Forum People's Right to Information, RTI Act 2005" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to HumJanenge+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

--
National Campaign for People's Right to Information
Email: ncpri.india@gmail.com
www.righttoinformation.info

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Re: [IAC#RG] Rajaji's views on amendment to nullify Supreme Court verdict

Of course the Parliament is the supreme body. The judiciary is independent but does not make laws but interprets them, and makes sure that they are applied correctly. The recent SC judgement was seen as somewhat judicial overreach, although from the point of view of public good the suggested law would appear to be correct but the Political parties did not take it kindly and want to change it through some amendment to the existing laws. All party are united in this matter.

 

I hope this answers your question adeqyately.  Devinder

From: Gopalarao ganugapati <gvgrao33@gmail.com>
To: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Sent: Sunday, 18 August 2013, 17:46
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Rajaji's views on amendment to nullify Supreme Court verdict

The eternal question is whether supreme court or the parliament is superior. Can any of our friends answer this?

On Sunday, August 18, 2013, Venkatraman Ns <nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com> wrote:
>  To
>
> India Against Corruption
>
>                   Rajaji's views on amendment to nullify Supreme Court verdict           
>
>  
>
> The move of the parliamentarians to make amendment  to ensure that Supreme Court's verdict barring convicted persons from entering parliament and assemblies  is causing concern to citizens who want probity in public life.
>
> Rajaji, the foresighted statesman  wrote an article titled "Lawless Legislation" in Swarajya  dated 14th September,1963, disapproving the tendency of parliamentarians to undo the verdict of Supreme Court.  The extract  from  Rajaji's article  is given below.
>
> The President and Prime Minister as well as the leader of the opposition in Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha should read this and derive the right lessons.
>
>   QUOTE                                             LAWLESS  LEGISLATION
>
> Laws passed contrary to fundamental principles of law have been called  `lawless‟ laws. When they are contrary not only to fundamental principles but to  the express Articles of the Constitution embodying them, they are still more lawless.
>
> And the climax of lawlessness is reached, when the law actually seeks to amend the  Constitution itself, in order to bring it into line with itself. The lawlessness is  aggravated by a spirit of open rebellion against the Constitution.
>
> The Constitution has, no doubt, laid down procedure for amending the Constitution.  To utilize those provisions in order to legalize what is contrary to the intent and  purpose of the Articles relating to fundamental – that is, inviolable – basic rights is to use the letter of the Constitution to defeat the Constitution itself and to "make  faith void and sacred promises of none effect".
>
> These rights embodied in the Constitution are called fundamental, because they are  not rights newly conferred on the citizen by the State but are a recognition and  confirmation of freedom coeval with birth in a civilized country.
>
> If each time the Supreme Court gives an adverse verdict against the Government in  respect of the validity of a law passed at its instance, the Government organize a  constitutional amendment to be steam rolled  though  Parliament in order to make the  judicial pronouncement of none effect.
>
> In the process, the image of the Supreme Court is bound to lose all public respect.  Supreme Court will ultimately lose its own sense of confidence and independence. It  is superfluous to point out that this is against the spirit and structure of the Constitution.
>
> UNQUOTE
>
> N.S.Venkataraman
>
> Nandini Voice For The Deprived
>
> Email :- nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com
>

--

G.V.Gopalarao,BA,BE,DIIT,MIE
Professional Engineer (IEI)

26/378A,Buttaipeta.

Machilipatnam,521001

INDIA.

Phone: Landline 91 8672 221315

Cell:7893935473 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in/

Re: [IAC#RG] Fwd: [HumJanenge] SAVE RTI Appoint RTI activists as CIC Information Commissioners

Dear NCPRI

The email from "ncpri2004@yahoo.co.in" to this IAC list was forwarded from Humjanenge@googlegroups.com. From what we can make out it was sent from "ncpri2004@yahoo.co.in" by somebody in South Africa using a Vodafone Blackberry which was forwarded from the website http:saverti.webege.com (hosted on hostinger.com) ip address "31.170.164.137". This website "webege.com" is on the URI blacklist and is used for all sorts of email scams.

Since "ncpri2004@yahoo.co.in" was definitely an official NCPRI email address (do a google search) and has been on our (HJ's) mailing list for donkeys years, please see if your account has been hacked so that we may delete it to prevent such episodes in future.

BTW: What is NCPRI's position, if any, on appointment of ex-Bureaucrats as ICs in general, and the appointment of either P.K.Misra or one of the senior serving ICs as Chief Information Commissioners without any advt./notice specifically.

Sarbajit

On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 2:38 PM, NCPRI India <ncpri.india@gmail.com> wrote:

CLARIFICATION

 

This is to clarify that the NCPRI has neither issued any statement demanding the appointment of RTI activists as Information Commissioners nor has it authorised any person to issue such a statement. The email with the subject line: "SAVE RTI Appoint activists as CIC Information Commissioners" sent via email id: ncpri2004@yahoo.co.in, mentioning one of our members - Ms. Amrita Johri, is not only fraudulent but also mischievous. The official email id of NCPRI is ncpri.india@gmail.com. We request readers to check with us first whenever they receive such fraudulent messages.

Please circulate this clarification amongst your networks to avoid any confusion or misunderstanding about the NCPRI.

 

Nikhil Dey, Anjali Bhardwaj & Venkatesh Nayak

(Co-convenors of the NCPRI)

On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Raminder Singh <ramisingh.bbc@gmail.com> wrote:

Amrita,

The tip on RaiSinha is actually 4 months under India's first woman Chief Information Commissioner, with PKM getting in for now as an IC like ANT did ?

RS "Raminder" Pabbi

On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 2:57 PM, NCPRI INDIA <ncpri2004@yahoo.co.in> wrote:

To Dear all,

 

15 August 2013

 

The National Campaign for Peoples' Right to Information (NCPRI) supports the popular demand expressed by Anna Hazare that selections for 5 approved posts for Central Information Commissioners, including Chief Information Commissioner, be only filled from those applicants who are not from the category "widely experienced in administration and governance", which category has been garnering a disproportionately excessive share in such posts.

 

Thank you,

 

Amrita Johri

 

9810273984

 

(On behalf of the NCPRI)

 

-- National Campaign for People's Right to Information

 

Email: ncpri.india@gmail.com

 

www.righttoinformation.info

 

In reply to

 

Dear all RTI activists

 

The Govt and BJP have already decided that Pradeep Kumar Mishra will be appointed as next Chief Information Commissioner.

We request all RTI activists to join Anna's Save RTI campaign.

Please reply to this email with your details like name address and mobile.

RTI activists please submit their names, mobile and address for Anna's Save RTI campaign. on this online form also if you are not member of any mailing list

Next CIC P.K.Misra - Secretary DoPT

The Govt and BJP have decided that Pradeep Kumar Mishra will be appointed as next Chief Information Commissioner. They have taken this decision without issuing any notice or seeking applications for the post. Govt. only wants pliable person in such sensitive positions who know the tricks by which one ex-government officer will help another government officer to escape from giving information. A person who will never impose penalty on the bureaucracy so that he will keep his posh bungalow in Delhi after retirement. Pradeep Kumar Mishra is such a person and it is fixed with Sushma Swaraj that he will be sent to the Central Information Commission. GOD SAVE RTI

On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

1) The online form is not working

2) In terms of Oct.18 2012 agreement, please do not use "India Against Corruption" wording under Anna's photo's

3) Who is Anna Hazare to select a panel of 5 names ?

 

On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:33 PM, join bvga <joinbvga@gmail.com> wrote:

PLEASE  ADD  YOUR  NAME

Reply to his email or fill the online form

SAVE RTI Appoint RTI activists as CIC Information Commissioners

Save-RTI, stop DoPT secretly appointing only retired babus to Central Information Commission.

ANNA HAZARE APPEALS to INDIA

ANNA HAZARE says only citizens can save RTI now.
ANNA HAZARE says VOTE OUT BOTH Congress and the BJP unless all 5 Information Commissioners appointed now are RTI activists.

Next CIC P.K.Misra - Secretary DoPT

The Govt and BJP have decided that Pradeep Kumar Mishra will be appointed as next Chief Information Commissioner. They have taken this decision without issuing any notice or seeking applications for the post. Govt. only wants pliable person in such sensitive positions who know the tricks by which one ex-government officer will help another government officer to escape from goving information. A person who will never impose penalty on the bureaucracy so that he will get his posh bungalow in Delhi after retirement. Pradeep Kumar Mishra is such a person and it is fixed with Sushma Swaraj that he will be sent to the Central Information Commission. GOD SAVE RTI

What can citizen do to save RTI?

Section 12(5)of RTI Act
"The Chief Information Commissioner and Information Commissioners shall be persons of eminence in public life with wide knowledge and experience in law, science and technology, social service, management, journalism, mass media or administration and governance".This does not mean that only Babus can be appointed

India's War Against Corruption will only succeed if honest persons experienced in fighting against corruption for years and who know the tricks of bureaucracy to deny information are appointed to the Information Commission. Anna has prepared a panel list of 5 such honest activist persons to send it to PM and demand that they and only they be appointed.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "INDIA RTI for empowerment" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rti4empowerment+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "HumJanenge Forum People's Right to Information, RTI Act 2005" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to HumJanenge+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

--
National Campaign for People's Right to Information
Email: ncpri.india@gmail.com
www.righttoinformation.info

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in