Sunday, January 27, 2013

Re: [IAC#RG] Justice Verma Report: Verma commission report draws armed forces' fire

No one is talking that the Transport Minister and Transport Commissioner ; Home Minister and Police commissioner , the real culprits should have been straight away punished in all such cases because these cases  happen due their dereliction of duties . How can 300 such buses have  been plying illegally on the roads for years together.
The staff operating these buses must have  been  knowing as to in  whose pockets  this ill gotten  money has been going  . 

The real culprits are  the custodians of these  laws from Manti ji down below  who have been neglecting their duties to earn extra amount .Unless Transparency , Responsibility and Accountability is not embedded in the system , all these reports are just an eye wash.

Brig J S Ahuja



On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 4:30 PM, rb purohit <rbpurohit4productivity@gmail.com> wrote:

Father and Son. Of course. But not what you mean. They must be FA and OA. They want Army withdrawn. They want LOC LOLR. Line Of Least Resistance. They want to Break Away. Yes I do want Army. But to rehabitate Pundits thrown away by those separatists. I  want repeal 370. I want J Π K a part of India. Integrate. I want army at Borders. There are no complaints of ARMY RAPE. Why only in Disturbed Area. LOLR.

On 27-Jan-2013 3:59 PM, "Navnith Krishnan" <navkris@hotmail.com> wrote:
I think both the father and son duo should be sent to LOC and other critical areas where our soldiers fight nad die with one hand tied brhind.

navnith

 

 


 

From: shantibhush@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 08:33:04 +0530
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Justice Verma Report: Verma commission report draws armed forces' fire

In the hypothetical case refferred by you, nobody has committed any offence,yet one can conceive that a false accusation can be made. The solution would be to provide that in the case of armymen only a high police officer alone would have the authority to exercise the powers of an investigating officer.Incidentally I am not Prashant Bhushan but Shanti Bhushan.

Sent from my iPad

On Jan 26, 2013, at 10:09 PM, arun joshi <colarun.joshi@gmail.com> wrote:

Respected Prashant Bhushan,
I describe to you an actual situation experienced and please do educate me about "breech of command responsibility"
An infiltrating group is ambushed. A few infiltrators make good an escape from the killing area(mind you it is past midnight) The CO is informed and he knows that these few will either go back to POK or head for the nearest village on our side where he will be given shelter by their contact. 
The Co rustles up more quick reaction teams and sends them to the village /hamlet/bhaiks/huts. A couple of militants are sighted entering a village. Pursuit by own troops is in progress , who notice them entering a house. Officer and Jawans already brain washed about rape assault physical abuse etc. 
For our patrol, at this stage, of primary concern is to "search and destroy". They enter the house. Man of the house not present, probably undertaking morning ablutions.  Lady of the house with a daughter or two shout on top of their voice. 
The other villagers outside the house interpret the shouting in many different ways- mostly detrimental to the Jawans (they do not love us much). 
The Commanding Officer  is located in his Tactical HQ which may be miles away.The Company Commander having moved to the ambush site to obtain actionable intelligence from those who have survived. Both not in the house and village
As a Commanding Officer my primary responsibility is to counter infiltration and achieve moral ascendency over the LOC. I have fulfilled my other equally important responsibilities of briefing my Jawans and Officers of various do's and don'ts that need to be observed in that environment.(All are taught to us in the Formation Battle school prior to induction into the area) 
So now I as a CO, my company commander, the patrol leader and those unfortunate Jawans who were doing their primary duty have to gather evidence and prove that there was no malice in our actions inside the house and we did not indulge in any abuse whatever which resulted in the women shouting.
For how long will this command chain not be available to the unit labouring to prove that they are innocent and there is no breech of command responsibility?. Perish the thought that it will be disposed off quickly. 
Please also note that I have simply not touched upon the effect it will have on the Unit and its Morale. There will be a sudden drop in performance.
How will our Justice system interpret"breech of command responsibility" Please put me wise.
Whereas I have full faith and confidence in a selected few within the Judicial system to understand and interpret "command responsibility" this very abstract concept outside my organisation, will be least understood by The Honourable men sitting in judgement at the level which will be dealing with such cases. 
It is for this precise reason  the committee should spend time with us folks in Macchil  Kupwara  Manipur etc and then take a decision ,if at all. I can assure you they will be convinced not to disturb a hornet's nest.
God Forbid a feeling should not creep into our men- damn the primary task let us take care of ourselves by doing nothing, mark time in the insurgency area and look forward to a peace station to spend time with the wife and kids.


On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Shanti Bhushan <shantibhush@gmail.com> wrote:
Let it be clear that according to Justice Verma committee report There would be breach of command responsibility only and only if the CO failed to take such measures as he could have taken to prevent the cmmission of rape by his subordinate that he would be guilty of the offence of breach of command. If on facts he could not have reasonably done so then no action has been sugested against him.

Sent from my iPad

On Jan 26, 2013, at 5:23 AM, "Col Madan Sharma (Veteran)" <madanjbp@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Seema Mustafa

On 25 January 2013 18:06, seema mustafa <seemamustafa@gmail.com> wrote:
Ridiculous comments by some in the story. If the CO can't ensure the conduct of his men towards women all the more reason for the ordinary criminal laws of the land to be made applicable instead of protecting sexual molesters under AfSPA. 
The false case excuse has been heard many times before. One there are very few women who will say they have been raped when they have not; and besides surely the courts and the investigating authorities can be trusted to being justice? The army can always represent its men if it is convinced of their innocence in the courts.

Seema Mustafa

On 25-Jan-2013, at 9:40, swarup sarkar <swarup1973@gmail.com> wrote:

What can be our stand on this issue?

Verma commission report draws armed forces' fire

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Verma-commission-report-draws-armed-forces-fire/articleshow/18174402.cms
NEW DELHI: The J S Verma Committee report has come under intense criticism from security forces for suggesting "breach of command responsibility", holding a commanding officer (CO) responsible if a junior commits rape. The report's suggestion to amend the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA) has also been opposed by the armed and the paramilitary forces.

Many COs and senior officers are arguing that the breach of command responsibility was unacceptable and could lead to COs ending up in jail for upto seven years for the misdeeds of a junior.

"I have almost 1,000 personnel under me, and they are spread across some five kilometres. They could go on leave, or temporary duty. How am I to ensure their sexual conduct throughout the year, 24 hours a day?" asks the CO of an Army unit.

Officials in the Union home ministry too were taken aback by the panel's "unusual" suggestion to include "breach of command responsibility" as an offence under Section 376. "How can the officer commanding a battalion be held responsible if a junior he sends on a patrol suddenly chooses to go morally astray?" asked an officer, adding that vicarious liability in such a case is "nothing short of absurd".

Another senior officer of the security establishment indicated that the forces deployed in conflict zones like Jammu & Kashmir, Maoist-affected states and the insurgency-hit areas in the north-east, have to constantly guard against foisting of false cases by local, self-proclaimed rights groups who may actually be a front of terrorist or extremist groups. "The J S Verma committee's suggestion, if accepted, will only give such activists a legal handle to falsely implicate not only the jawan but his CO as well," the official warned.

A senior CRPF officer posted in a Naxal-infested area said, "Inserting breach of command responsibility in Section 376 is stretching the law too far. There is so much moral degradation in the society. Anyone can commit a crime on a given day. How can you hold the commanding officer responsible because a constable has gone berserk. No one will work for the forces then."

A BSF officer from the Eastern frontier added, "This is akin to jailing the mother for the crime of the son. We already have a mechanism where commanding officer is reprimanded for transgressions of a junior officer; administrative actions are taken. But punishing him for individual aberration is just not on. Unless there is an organised criminal behaviour in a unit, commanding officer cannot be held responsible."

The J S Verma Committee has recommended the introduction of a new section 376F in the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for offence of breach of command responsibility. The proposal is to hold responsible "whoever, being a public servant in command, control or supervision of the police or armed forces...or assuming command whether lawfully or otherwise, fails to exercise control over persons under his or her command, control, or supervision and as a result of such failure" rape and similar offences are committed.

The COs would be held "guilty of the offence of breach of command responsibility" if he "failed to take necessary and reasonable measures within his or her power to prevent or repress the commission of the said offences," the committee has recommended.

Presently, there is no criminal liability for a CO of an Army unit in cases where his subordinates are involved in any kind of breach of discipline. It does of course invite administrative action, or even dismissed from service. The introduction of a criminal liability by a CO for actions of a junior would add a completely new and extremely challenging burden to being a CO, say army officers.

The Committee has also recommended amendments to the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA), saying, that "impunity for systematic or isolated sexual violence in the process of Internal Security duties is being legitimized" by AFSPA.





Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Dear Seema Mustafa, Read your comments on the Security Forces, have you ever appreciated what the command of a unit involves . Can you make a person responsible for the acts of his more then 850 subordinates?more so when his is not present with them. I am sure you do not have any idea what commanding troops means. As it is strictures are passed on the commanding officers of any incident involving his subordinates. Pushing him to the wall will only be at the cost of his responsibility. Imagine  what the CO of Rajputana Rifles must have gone through after the Krishna Ghati incident, can the CO be held responsible for the deeds of the enemy. In your opinion he must be, this is just commenting for commenting sake without application of logic. I wish you could gather closer knowledge by being with a unit for few days and also go through the hell when deployed on LOC or counter insurgency duties. Regards,
-- t

Col Madan Sharma (Veteran) 
 Indian Infanteer
HAPPINESS IS JOURNEY,  NOT DESTINATION 
CONSERVE & HARVEST RAIN  WATER
PLEASE GO GREEN BY USING BIODEGRADABLE PACKING MATERIAL

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



--
Col Arun Joshi(Veteran)
The INFANTEER
CONSERVE WATER
USE BIODEGRADABLE PACKING MATERIAL

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Re: [IAC#RG] Why was Bose diminished on Republic Day? (advance copy)

There are several questions unanswered about Netaji's death. Why did the governments of Free India suppress all news about his disappearance. Often, one hears many non-Bengalis poke fun at  Bengali ire on this issue( without really bothering to know the composition of the INA-which was truly representative of the Indian UNION) . It is time that Netaji's unbiased love for his country, and his respect for all Indians, irrespective of their faith, is acknowledged and strived for. It will make us a better nation, and a better people.
 
There ought to be some thought spared for the INA martyrs too; one hears of how their contribution was totally ignored. They never received the respect due to freedom fighters, nor the minimum privileges. They fought in the most difficult terrain, braved enemy bullets and jungles to bring India closer to freedom.The Andamans were freed by the INA much before most of India became free. Yet, Netaji's contribution remains largely unsung!
 
Rina Mukherji
Kolkata

On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Ravindran P M <raviforjustice@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for sharing this immensely readable piece and a pertinent question to ponder.

regards n bw

ravi

On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
Byline for 27 January 2013

 

Why was Bose diminished on Republic Day?

 

M.J. Akbar

 

We measure power through size. Check any political poster. The boss gets the biggest face. Others in the pecking order descend till the miniature at the end.


Why was Subhas Chandra Bose struggling among the also-rans in the Bengal Republic Day tableau? Swami Vivekananda, understandably, had pride of place. But it might have been better to keep Bose out of the jumble rather than literally reduce his stature. If Bengal forgets, how long will India remember the only Indian to head a government of united India?


Bose declared independence before the British gave it in 1947. His government in exile did not have Gandhi's sanction. It fought on the wrong side of the Second World War: but it was a proud and free government whose contribution to our freedom has been reduced by the domestic political forces he challenged.

 

Bose is an embarrassment to Congress because he challenged Gandhi, and was a powerful parallel icon to Nehru. Bose asked Indians to give him their blood, and he would give them freedom. Gandhi promised freedom without violence. Gandhi refused to join the British war effort in 1939; Bose went a step further, and led Indian troops on the side of the Germany-Italy-Japan axis. However, their horizon, freedom, was the same.

 

More than six decades later the argument might seem pedantic, and yet it is worth revisiting. Invaluable Indian blood and treasure helped Britain win the First World War. After victory, Britain reneged on its commitment to Indian self-rule within the empire without batting an eyelid. Instead of dominion status, Indians got vicious brutality at Jallianwala Bagh and the pernicious Rowlatt Act.


It is not generally known that Gandhi was not a pacifist: he served on British frontlines in the Boer and Zulu wars in South Africa, and was very eager to lead a medical unit to the killing fields of France in 1914, at the onset of the First World War. In 1918, Gandhi worked so hard as a recruiting agent for the British army, urging Gujaratis to prove they were not "effeminate" by picking up a gun, that he almost died of exhaustion. Farewell bhajans began to be sung before he recovered. Gandhi lost hope in Britain only when he felt betrayed.

 

Britain had as much to protect in 1945 as in 1918. London knew that its empire would unravel at the point where it had begun, in India, once India became independent. What pushed Britain towards the exit gate? Of course there was the irresistible momentum of Gandhi's nationwide struggle. But the British had faced this challenge before, in the non-cooperation movement 25 years before. The significant difference was the nationalist sentiment unleashed by Bose among Indians in uniform. Bose's Indian National Army [INA] showed them where their national loyalties should lie. Bose's war also inspired the young to surge beyond the confines of Congress.

 

Even Gandhi, who only had faint praise for Bose in a 1945 obituary ["Subhas Bose has died well. He was undoubtedly a patriot though misguided"], had to admit in an article published on 15 February 1946, "The hypnotism of the Indian National Army has cast its spell on us... [Netaji's] patriotism is second to none... He aimed high but failed. Who has not failed?... The lesson that Netaji and his army brings to us is one of self-sacrifice, unity irrespective of class and community, and discipline..." When the British put three INA officers — Shah Nawaz, a Muslim, Sahgal, a Hindu, and Dhillon, a Sikh — on trial for sedition, India exploded in wrath. Nehru said on 24 December 1945, "The INA trial has created a mass upheaval."

 

Bose broke the backbone of British rule when he destroyed trust between the British Raj and its armed forces. The eminently sensible Sir Claude Auchinleck, commander in chief, accepted that any extreme punishment for INA officers would make governance impossible, because Indians adored them as national heroes. This, he said, was the "general opinion held in India, not only by the public, but ... by quite a considerable part of the Indian Army as well".

 

Subhas Bose's contribution to the formation of a Republic of India was no less than that of the very greatest of our founding fathers. Bose proved in practice what an Indian secular state would be. At a time when the Muslim League was in ascendant, he had the love and trust of Muslims. He lived his dream of gender equality when he set up the Rani of Jhansi regiment, under the fiery and beautiful Lakshmi Swaminathan. When Bose told the Japanese he was setting up a women's-only force, they thought he was joking. I do not believe Bose could have fought alongside Hitler, who advised the British to shoot Gandhi dead, and resented the Japanese advance because he thought Asia was being lost to white Europeans. Hitler was an undisguised racist, as were all Nazis.

 

Perhaps India can survive without Bose. But such amnesia will only diminish India.



Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



--
Veteran Major P M Ravindran
 
You may also like to visit:
'Judiciary Watch' at www.vigilonline.com 

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Re: [IAC#RG] Justice Verma Report: Verma commission report draws armed forces' fire

why debate the issue justice verma has lost it . let him go to school again.


On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 2:52 PM, G.S. Beniwal <beniwalg@ymail.com> wrote:
will CJI  be prosecuted if any of the  subordinate judges does similar illegal act ? and PM for his subordinates ?  CP for his constables/inspectors?.  if yes, then justice verma is right. does only army personnel should be disciplined and not civilians ?  most people do not know how fast action is taken by army against the in disciplined person/.  


From:
Vijoy Ambasta <vijoy.ambasta@gmail.com>
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Sent: Saturday, 26 January 2013 10:59 PM
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Justice Verma Report: Verma commission report draws armed forces' fire

If you want the borders of the country secure, AFSPA must not be diluted.For safeguarding the" rights" if we have to give up the "right to our borders", we then have to make  a judicious choice. The actions of the armed forces are always under a very strict disciplined regime & the system has to have undiluted trust on that( unlike the neta/police regime in civil life) so judicial scrutiny can leave a lot of scars on our borders and on the morals of those disciplined soldiers who are guarding the borders in order that the civilians have a peaceful sleep added by the security of the nation's laws.
With all regards to Justice Verma, he has not been able to understand the importance of Nation's security in the same perspective as the armed forces do.and operate. The constitution of India is not applicable to the foreign infiltrators and who assist them i.e who are traitors.
Vijoy K Ambasta

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:40 AM, swarup sarkar <swarup1973@gmail.com> wrote:

What can be our stand on this issue?

Verma commission report draws armed forces' fire

NEW DELHI: The J S Verma Committee report has come under intense criticism from security forces for suggesting "breach of command responsibility", holding a commanding officer (CO) responsible if a junior commits rape. The report's suggestion to amend the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA) has also been opposed by the armed and the paramilitary forces.

Many COs and senior officers are arguing that the breach of command responsibility was unacceptable and could lead to COs ending up in jail for upto seven years for the misdeeds of a junior.

"I have almost 1,000 personnel under me, and they are spread across some five kilometres. They could go on leave, or temporary duty. How am I to ensure their sexual conduct throughout the year, 24 hours a day?" asks the CO of an Army unit.

Officials in the Union home ministry too were taken aback by the panel's "unusual" suggestion to include "breach of command responsibility" as an offence under Section 376. "How can the officer commanding a battalion be held responsible if a junior he sends on a patrol suddenly chooses to go morally astray?" asked an officer, adding that vicarious liability in such a case is "nothing short of absurd".

Another senior officer of the security establishment indicated that the forces deployed in conflict zones like Jammu & Kashmir, Maoist-affected states and the insurgency-hit areas in the north-east, have to constantly guard against foisting of false cases by local, self-proclaimed rights groups who may actually be a front of terrorist or extremist groups. "The J S Verma committee's suggestion, if accepted, will only give such activists a legal handle to falsely implicate not only the jawan but his CO as well," the official warned.

A senior CRPF officer posted in a Naxal-infested area said, "Inserting breach of command responsibility in Section 376 is stretching the law too far. There is so much moral degradation in the society. Anyone can commit a crime on a given day. How can you hold the commanding officer responsible because a constable has gone berserk. No one will work for the forces then."

A BSF officer from the Eastern frontier added, "This is akin to jailing the mother for the crime of the son. We already have a mechanism where commanding officer is reprimanded for transgressions of a junior officer; administrative actions are taken. But punishing him for individual aberration is just not on. Unless there is an organised criminal behaviour in a unit, commanding officer cannot be held responsible."

The J S Verma Committee has recommended the introduction of a new section 376F in the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for offence of breach of command responsibility. The proposal is to hold responsible "whoever, being a public servant in command, control or supervision of the police or armed forces...or assuming command whether lawfully or otherwise, fails to exercise control over persons under his or her command, control, or supervision and as a result of such failure" rape and similar offences are committed.

The COs would be held "guilty of the offence of breach of command responsibility" if he "failed to take necessary and reasonable measures within his or her power to prevent or repress the commission of the said offences," the committee has recommended.

Presently, there is no criminal liability for a CO of an Army unit in cases where his subordinates are involved in any kind of breach of discipline. It does of course invite administrative action, or even dismissed from service. The introduction of a criminal liability by a CO for actions of a junior would add a completely new and extremely challenging burden to being a CO, say army officers.

The Committee has also recommended amendments to the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA), saying, that "impunity for systematic or isolated sexual violence in the process of Internal Security duties is being legitimized" by AFSPA.




Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



--
AK Mahajan

RE: [IAC#RG] Justice Verma Report: Verma commission report draws armed forces' fire

Father and Son. Of course. But not what you mean. They must be FA and OA. They want Army withdrawn. They want LOC LOLR. Line Of Least Resistance. They want to Break Away. Yes I do want Army. But to rehabitate Pundits thrown away by those separatists. I  want repeal 370. I want J Π K a part of India. Integrate. I want army at Borders. There are no complaints of ARMY RAPE. Why only in Disturbed Area. LOLR.

On 27-Jan-2013 3:59 PM, "Navnith Krishnan" <navkris@hotmail.com> wrote:
I think both the father and son duo should be sent to LOC and other critical areas where our soldiers fight nad die with one hand tied brhind.

navnith

 

 


 

From: shantibhush@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 08:33:04 +0530
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Justice Verma Report: Verma commission report draws armed forces' fire

In the hypothetical case refferred by you, nobody has committed any offence,yet one can conceive that a false accusation can be made. The solution would be to provide that in the case of armymen only a high police officer alone would have the authority to exercise the powers of an investigating officer.Incidentally I am not Prashant Bhushan but Shanti Bhushan.

Sent from my iPad

On Jan 26, 2013, at 10:09 PM, arun joshi <colarun.joshi@gmail.com> wrote:

Respected Prashant Bhushan,
I describe to you an actual situation experienced and please do educate me about "breech of command responsibility"
An infiltrating group is ambushed. A few infiltrators make good an escape from the killing area(mind you it is past midnight) The CO is informed and he knows that these few will either go back to POK or head for the nearest village on our side where he will be given shelter by their contact. 
The Co rustles up more quick reaction teams and sends them to the village /hamlet/bhaiks/huts. A couple of militants are sighted entering a village. Pursuit by own troops is in progress , who notice them entering a house. Officer and Jawans already brain washed about rape assault physical abuse etc. 
For our patrol, at this stage, of primary concern is to "search and destroy". They enter the house. Man of the house not present, probably undertaking morning ablutions.  Lady of the house with a daughter or two shout on top of their voice. 
The other villagers outside the house interpret the shouting in many different ways- mostly detrimental to the Jawans (they do not love us much). 
The Commanding Officer  is located in his Tactical HQ which may be miles away.The Company Commander having moved to the ambush site to obtain actionable intelligence from those who have survived. Both not in the house and village
As a Commanding Officer my primary responsibility is to counter infiltration and achieve moral ascendency over the LOC. I have fulfilled my other equally important responsibilities of briefing my Jawans and Officers of various do's and don'ts that need to be observed in that environment.(All are taught to us in the Formation Battle school prior to induction into the area) 
So now I as a CO, my company commander, the patrol leader and those unfortunate Jawans who were doing their primary duty have to gather evidence and prove that there was no malice in our actions inside the house and we did not indulge in any abuse whatever which resulted in the women shouting.
For how long will this command chain not be available to the unit labouring to prove that they are innocent and there is no breech of command responsibility?. Perish the thought that it will be disposed off quickly. 
Please also note that I have simply not touched upon the effect it will have on the Unit and its Morale. There will be a sudden drop in performance.
How will our Justice system interpret"breech of command responsibility" Please put me wise.
Whereas I have full faith and confidence in a selected few within the Judicial system to understand and interpret "command responsibility" this very abstract concept outside my organisation, will be least understood by The Honourable men sitting in judgement at the level which will be dealing with such cases. 
It is for this precise reason  the committee should spend time with us folks in Macchil  Kupwara  Manipur etc and then take a decision ,if at all. I can assure you they will be convinced not to disturb a hornet's nest.
God Forbid a feeling should not creep into our men- damn the primary task let us take care of ourselves by doing nothing, mark time in the insurgency area and look forward to a peace station to spend time with the wife and kids.


On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Shanti Bhushan <shantibhush@gmail.com> wrote:
Let it be clear that according to Justice Verma committee report There would be breach of command responsibility only and only if the CO failed to take such measures as he could have taken to prevent the cmmission of rape by his subordinate that he would be guilty of the offence of breach of command. If on facts he could not have reasonably done so then no action has been sugested against him.

Sent from my iPad

On Jan 26, 2013, at 5:23 AM, "Col Madan Sharma (Veteran)" <madanjbp@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Seema Mustafa

On 25 January 2013 18:06, seema mustafa <seemamustafa@gmail.com> wrote:
Ridiculous comments by some in the story. If the CO can't ensure the conduct of his men towards women all the more reason for the ordinary criminal laws of the land to be made applicable instead of protecting sexual molesters under AfSPA. 
The false case excuse has been heard many times before. One there are very few women who will say they have been raped when they have not; and besides surely the courts and the investigating authorities can be trusted to being justice? The army can always represent its men if it is convinced of their innocence in the courts.

Seema Mustafa

On 25-Jan-2013, at 9:40, swarup sarkar <swarup1973@gmail.com> wrote:

What can be our stand on this issue?

Verma commission report draws armed forces' fire

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Verma-commission-report-draws-armed-forces-fire/articleshow/18174402.cms
NEW DELHI: The J S Verma Committee report has come under intense criticism from security forces for suggesting "breach of command responsibility", holding a commanding officer (CO) responsible if a junior commits rape. The report's suggestion to amend the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA) has also been opposed by the armed and the paramilitary forces.

Many COs and senior officers are arguing that the breach of command responsibility was unacceptable and could lead to COs ending up in jail for upto seven years for the misdeeds of a junior.

"I have almost 1,000 personnel under me, and they are spread across some five kilometres. They could go on leave, or temporary duty. How am I to ensure their sexual conduct throughout the year, 24 hours a day?" asks the CO of an Army unit.

Officials in the Union home ministry too were taken aback by the panel's "unusual" suggestion to include "breach of command responsibility" as an offence under Section 376. "How can the officer commanding a battalion be held responsible if a junior he sends on a patrol suddenly chooses to go morally astray?" asked an officer, adding that vicarious liability in such a case is "nothing short of absurd".

Another senior officer of the security establishment indicated that the forces deployed in conflict zones like Jammu & Kashmir, Maoist-affected states and the insurgency-hit areas in the north-east, have to constantly guard against foisting of false cases by local, self-proclaimed rights groups who may actually be a front of terrorist or extremist groups. "The J S Verma committee's suggestion, if accepted, will only give such activists a legal handle to falsely implicate not only the jawan but his CO as well," the official warned.

A senior CRPF officer posted in a Naxal-infested area said, "Inserting breach of command responsibility in Section 376 is stretching the law too far. There is so much moral degradation in the society. Anyone can commit a crime on a given day. How can you hold the commanding officer responsible because a constable has gone berserk. No one will work for the forces then."

A BSF officer from the Eastern frontier added, "This is akin to jailing the mother for the crime of the son. We already have a mechanism where commanding officer is reprimanded for transgressions of a junior officer; administrative actions are taken. But punishing him for individual aberration is just not on. Unless there is an organised criminal behaviour in a unit, commanding officer cannot be held responsible."

The J S Verma Committee has recommended the introduction of a new section 376F in the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for offence of breach of command responsibility. The proposal is to hold responsible "whoever, being a public servant in command, control or supervision of the police or armed forces...or assuming command whether lawfully or otherwise, fails to exercise control over persons under his or her command, control, or supervision and as a result of such failure" rape and similar offences are committed.

The COs would be held "guilty of the offence of breach of command responsibility" if he "failed to take necessary and reasonable measures within his or her power to prevent or repress the commission of the said offences," the committee has recommended.

Presently, there is no criminal liability for a CO of an Army unit in cases where his subordinates are involved in any kind of breach of discipline. It does of course invite administrative action, or even dismissed from service. The introduction of a criminal liability by a CO for actions of a junior would add a completely new and extremely challenging burden to being a CO, say army officers.

The Committee has also recommended amendments to the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA), saying, that "impunity for systematic or isolated sexual violence in the process of Internal Security duties is being legitimized" by AFSPA.





Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Dear Seema Mustafa, Read your comments on the Security Forces, have you ever appreciated what the command of a unit involves . Can you make a person responsible for the acts of his more then 850 subordinates?more so when his is not present with them. I am sure you do not have any idea what commanding troops means. As it is strictures are passed on the commanding officers of any incident involving his subordinates. Pushing him to the wall will only be at the cost of his responsibility. Imagine  what the CO of Rajputana Rifles must have gone through after the Krishna Ghati incident, can the CO be held responsible for the deeds of the enemy. In your opinion he must be, this is just commenting for commenting sake without application of logic. I wish you could gather closer knowledge by being with a unit for few days and also go through the hell when deployed on LOC or counter insurgency duties. Regards,
-- t

Col Madan Sharma (Veteran) 
 Indian Infanteer
HAPPINESS IS JOURNEY,  NOT DESTINATION 
CONSERVE & HARVEST RAIN  WATER
PLEASE GO GREEN BY USING BIODEGRADABLE PACKING MATERIAL

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



--
Col Arun Joshi(Veteran)
The INFANTEER
CONSERVE WATER
USE BIODEGRADABLE PACKING MATERIAL

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Re:[IAC#RG]

श्रीमान॥
ज्ञानार्जन की सीमा तक आप की बाते सही और स्वीकार हैं। मगर क्या अपना और क्या  दूसरे का इस विचारवृत्त की परिधि का निर्धारण आवश्यक है ।  जैसे हिंदुस्थान शब्द कई राज्यों को एक सीमा मे जोड़ता है उसी प्रकार हिन्दी कई भाषाओं को एक सीमा मे जोड़ती है । मुझे कोई आपत्ति नहीं किसी प्रादेशिक भाषा से मगर राष्ट्रभाषा के रूप मे हिन्दी को ही प्रतिस्थापित किया जा सकता है। कम से कम मैकाले के बबूल की पौध को खाद पानी देना उचित नहीं होगा ॥ 
विश्व के किसी भी देश ने अपनी राष्ट्रभाषा को छोड़कर प्रगति नहीं की है ...
कई सेना के अधिकारी यहाँ अपने विचार साझा करते हैं क्या वो भूल जाते हैं की रूस से आने वाला अभियंता न ही हिन्दी मे लिखता है न ही अङ्ग्रेज़ी मे उसके लिए भारत सरकार एक दुभाषिए की व्यवस्था करती है ......

जय श्री राम

On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 8:19 AM, kalyanam sundaresan <ask_maadhyama@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
Dear Mr. Chiranjeev Karna,

Hindustan is a country where multi languages are in use.  Almost each States have their own languages.  Even predominantly Hindi speaking States, the spoken Hindi is different in each State.  Out of the total population, 30 to 40% may speak Hindi and the remaining population are speaking, Marathi, Gujarathi, Urdu, Bengali, Odisa, Thelugu, Kannada, Tamil, Malayalam, Tulu, Bihari, Punjabi and the list will go long.  Most of the people are illiterate.  They may speak some language, but cannot read and write and it is applicable to Hindi speaking belt also.  How can you expect that all people will speak, read and write.  It is not known, how many generations it will take to reach to a common language. At the time of Independence, to unite the Country, Linguistic States were formed.  It looks now, that the decision is wrong. Even though, India is a united country, on language we are all divided   This barrier is to be removed first.

After forming Linguistic States, each State behaves like the erstwhile Princely States of Nizam, Mysore, Hyderabad, Trivancore, etc., etc.  Indra Gandhi scrapped Privy Purses for reasons best known to her.  But, new Princes have come up in the name of MPs, MLAs, Ministers, Governors, Presidents. After Independence. The wealth amazed and accumulated by the so called People's Representatives  is more than the Princes inherited. Even though, there are checks and balance in Democracy, this mechanism is not applied to check the wrong doers who flourish in the name of People's Representatives. The declared Wealth of some Ministers is more than 300 Crores and the average declared Wealth of Ministers is more than 50 Crores.  God only knows, what is their undeclared Wealth ?   How they  amazed this huge Wealth ? By inheritance ? From whom they inherited ? From their Father, Mother ? How they earned these Wealth ? Through Agriculture ? When Land Ceiling Acts have into force long back, how they possess such a vast landed property ? By Business ? Why Politicians allowed to do  Business when they have opted to serve the Public ? When the Politicians are not Educationists, how they are allowed to start Educational Institutions and become Vice Chancellors.  A Vice Chancellor should be an Academician ? A Vice Chancellor who has not even entered a High School are allowed to head a University and become  a VC ?  Central Ministers declaring when they file Nomination Papers to contest elections, that they have no Car, House and properties ? Election Commission is believing it and there is no Agency to verify these Declarations?  What a Shame ?  There is no end to list our Shame ? Let me stop it here.

With Best Regards,
A.S.KALYANAM

--- On Sat, 26/1/13, Chiranjeev Karna <karnacks@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Chiranjeev Karna <karnacks@gmail.com>
Subject: Re:[IAC#RG]
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Date: Saturday, 26 January, 2013, 5:07 PM


Mai to Hindustani Hun lekin is computer ke dwara hindi me kaise likhoon ye pata nahi hai. Kya aap meri madad karenge ???

2013/1/25 Ashu <ashu7oct@gmail.com>
सब इंडियन हैं या कोई भारतीय भी है यहाँ॥कई दिन से प्रयास कर रहा हूँ कोई हमारी मातृभाषा मे लिखे और उससे ज्ञानार्जन हो मगर यहाँ तो मैकाले की गंगोत्री दिख रही है ॥ 

जय श्री राम 

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



--
Regards,

Chiranjeev
+91-9868483034

Hope for The BEST to ALL

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Re: [IAC#RG] Justice Verma Report: Verma commission report draws armed forces' fire

will CJI  be prosecuted if any of the  subordinate judges does similar illegal act ? and PM for his subordinates ?  CP for his constables/inspectors?.  if yes, then justice verma is right. does only army personnel should be disciplined and not civilians ?  most people do not know how fast action is taken by army against the in disciplined person/.  


From:
Vijoy Ambasta <vijoy.ambasta@gmail.com>
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Sent: Saturday, 26 January 2013 10:59 PM
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Justice Verma Report: Verma commission report draws armed forces' fire

If you want the borders of the country secure, AFSPA must not be diluted.For safeguarding the" rights" if we have to give up the "right to our borders", we then have to make  a judicious choice. The actions of the armed forces are always under a very strict disciplined regime & the system has to have undiluted trust on that( unlike the neta/police regime in civil life) so judicial scrutiny can leave a lot of scars on our borders and on the morals of those disciplined soldiers who are guarding the borders in order that the civilians have a peaceful sleep added by the security of the nation's laws.
With all regards to Justice Verma, he has not been able to understand the importance of Nation's security in the same perspective as the armed forces do.and operate. The constitution of India is not applicable to the foreign infiltrators and who assist them i.e who are traitors.
Vijoy K Ambasta

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:40 AM, swarup sarkar <swarup1973@gmail.com> wrote:

What can be our stand on this issue?

Verma commission report draws armed forces' fire

NEW DELHI: The J S Verma Committee report has come under intense criticism from security forces for suggesting "breach of command responsibility", holding a commanding officer (CO) responsible if a junior commits rape. The report's suggestion to amend the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA) has also been opposed by the armed and the paramilitary forces.

Many COs and senior officers are arguing that the breach of command responsibility was unacceptable and could lead to COs ending up in jail for upto seven years for the misdeeds of a junior.

"I have almost 1,000 personnel under me, and they are spread across some five kilometres. They could go on leave, or temporary duty. How am I to ensure their sexual conduct throughout the year, 24 hours a day?" asks the CO of an Army unit.

Officials in the Union home ministry too were taken aback by the panel's "unusual" suggestion to include "breach of command responsibility" as an offence under Section 376. "How can the officer commanding a battalion be held responsible if a junior he sends on a patrol suddenly chooses to go morally astray?" asked an officer, adding that vicarious liability in such a case is "nothing short of absurd".

Another senior officer of the security establishment indicated that the forces deployed in conflict zones like Jammu & Kashmir, Maoist-affected states and the insurgency-hit areas in the north-east, have to constantly guard against foisting of false cases by local, self-proclaimed rights groups who may actually be a front of terrorist or extremist groups. "The J S Verma committee's suggestion, if accepted, will only give such activists a legal handle to falsely implicate not only the jawan but his CO as well," the official warned.

A senior CRPF officer posted in a Naxal-infested area said, "Inserting breach of command responsibility in Section 376 is stretching the law too far. There is so much moral degradation in the society. Anyone can commit a crime on a given day. How can you hold the commanding officer responsible because a constable has gone berserk. No one will work for the forces then."

A BSF officer from the Eastern frontier added, "This is akin to jailing the mother for the crime of the son. We already have a mechanism where commanding officer is reprimanded for transgressions of a junior officer; administrative actions are taken. But punishing him for individual aberration is just not on. Unless there is an organised criminal behaviour in a unit, commanding officer cannot be held responsible."

The J S Verma Committee has recommended the introduction of a new section 376F in the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for offence of breach of command responsibility. The proposal is to hold responsible "whoever, being a public servant in command, control or supervision of the police or armed forces...or assuming command whether lawfully or otherwise, fails to exercise control over persons under his or her command, control, or supervision and as a result of such failure" rape and similar offences are committed.

The COs would be held "guilty of the offence of breach of command responsibility" if he "failed to take necessary and reasonable measures within his or her power to prevent or repress the commission of the said offences," the committee has recommended.

Presently, there is no criminal liability for a CO of an Army unit in cases where his subordinates are involved in any kind of breach of discipline. It does of course invite administrative action, or even dismissed from service. The introduction of a criminal liability by a CO for actions of a junior would add a completely new and extremely challenging burden to being a CO, say army officers.

The Committee has also recommended amendments to the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA), saying, that "impunity for systematic or isolated sexual violence in the process of Internal Security duties is being legitimized" by AFSPA.




Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Re: [IAC++] WRITE A NEW CONSTITUTION

*****************************************
India Against Corruption {primary list}
*****************************************