Sunday, November 14, 2010

Re: [HumJanenge] [-] [rti4empowerment] Unsolicited emails from humjanenge@googlegroups.com

Dear Shri Dhirendra Krishna

a) As we had conveyed to another moderator of your yahoo group "rti4empowerment", the membership list of that group has been forwarded with a specific request that IDs of the members be added to this group.

b) Your statement that you are the "owner/moderator" of rti4empowerment is false and evasive. The reality is that there are other moderators, such as "bhartiya", "Colshivraj", "Colnrkurup", :"ckjain" and 4 other avatars of yourself. Anyone of these accounts could have been compromised.

c) The possibility of impending closure of Yahoogroups has been circulated to many Yahoo group owners and moderators, including yourself. You, and all your list moderators, were also repeatedly offered the opportunity to stake claim to the "rti4empowerment" and :"rti4ngo" OPENID groups at googlegroups (a copy of which is in our possession). Upon your default to claim these groups, they have been snapped up by one of your moderators. It is clarified though that the list-owner of Humjanenge googlegroup is not associated the list-owner of the rti4empowerment googlegroup.

d) Anyone who wishes to unsubscribe from HJ-GG can do so. It is an automated process over which the list owners have no control. Till date about 72 persons (including repeats ) have used this facility  (ie about 4% of the members added).  Sh. Mander was advised that since many group memberships lists (lawfully obtained) are being added to this list, having multiple memberships of other groups could result in his being unsubscribed and resubscribed. I reiterate that there is no question of forcing spam on unwilling netizens.

e) Lastly, there is no question of "borrowing" membership lists. The lawfully obtained membership lists are being "copied" / "archived" to this list, including as a backup in the likely event of Yahoogroups being closed down. If you have a problem with the persons you have annointed as "moderators" it is for you to resolve with them. I would also caution you that you may find that it was "you" who circulated your group's membership list to outsiders, a fact which may not settle well with your list's members.

PMK

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 5:08 PM, RTI4EMPOWERMENT <rti4empowerment.owner@gmail.com> wrote:
 

Friends,

As owner /moderator of yahoo group rti4ngo and rti4empowerment, let me state the factual position:

(A) It is absurd to state that yahoo groups are "collaborating" with google group humjanenge. There is no such collaboration with rti4ngo and rti4empowerment; I do not know about other groups.

(B) It is absurd and totally false to state that yahoo groups are closing on 15 January 2011.

(C) Persons who want to leave humjanenge@googlegroups.com, are not being allowed to do so without leaving their original group. This is an unethical and unwarranted intrusion in their privacy, arising from spam mail to persons who do not want them.

It is unfortunate that an absurd situation has been created borrowing email addresses from other groups and "membership list is being continuously churned from various Yahoo RTI groups".

Perpetrator of this unethical practice are requested to kindly seek legal advise and confine their enthusiasm to legal activities.

Dhirendra Krishna
Owner and moderator
yahoo groups rti4ngo and rti4empowerment.
.........................................................................................................................................

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Harsh <manderharsh@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks. I am not sure this helped. Because all except NCPRI replied `unable to process your message'. I hope it works. There has to be some way to not be forced to receive this flood of unwanted mail interchange.
Regards,
Harsh Mander

From: humjanenge@googlegroups.com [mailto:humjanenge@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of PMK1504
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2010 2:00 PM

To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Indian Institutions need brand building

Dear Mander (and any other dissatisfied member)

This group has not appointed any moderators as yet to individually service "unsubscribe" requests like yours.

The list owner and other members have repeatedly posted messages describing how to unsubscribe oneself. As this membership list is being continuously churned from various Yahoo RTI groups it is probable that you are being unsubscribed and resubscribed here.

To unsubscribe permanently from this group, you must first unsubscribe yourself from ALL the following RTI egroups by sending an email to the following IDs and re-confirming it.
The owners/moderators of many of these groups are collaborating to transfer their member lists before Yahoogroups is shut down on 15th January 2011

After unsubscribing send us an email.

PMK

HumJanenge-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.co.in

rti4empowerment-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

rti4ngo-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

rti_india-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

ncprimailinglist-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

ACB_india-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

sartianetwork-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

INDIA_WBA-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Harsh <manderharsh@gmail.com> wrote:
Pl unsubscribe me.

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___


--
Posted By RTI4EMPOWERMENT to - at 11/14/2010 03:38:00 AM

Re: [HumJanenge] [-] [rti4empowerment] Unsolicited emails from humjanenge@googlegroups.com

Oh, what a confusion? Where is the original HJ created by Kardaleyji on which we used to have the postings from Shahid Burneyji, Shailesh Gandhiji, Col Kurup, Sh. Punit Juneja, Sh. Dhirendra Krishna, Sh. Govind Sharma, Sh. Salil Gupta, Sh. Lokesh Batra, Sh. V_kudz, Sh. Veeresh Malik, Sh. Ajay Madhusudan Marathe, Sh. Manoj Pai, Sh. S. Anoop Kumar, Sh. Malay Bhattacharya, Sh. Rakesh Agarwal, Sh.  Manoj Kamra and many others who in fact were a sort of tutors teaching through their postings the nitty grittys of the RTI.
Regards
Dr. Jitendra Sharma
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 5:08 PM, RTI4EMPOWERMENT <rti4empowerment.owner@gmail.com> wrote:
 

Friends,

As owner /moderator of yahoo group rti4ngo and rti4empowerment, let me state the factual position:

(A) It is absurd to state that yahoo groups are "collaborating" with google group humjanenge. There is no such collaboration with rti4ngo and rti4empowerment; I do not know about other groups.

(B) It is absurd and totally false to state that yahoo groups are closing on 15 January 2011.

(C) Persons who want to leave humjanenge@googlegroups.com, are not being allowed to do so without leaving their original group. This is an unethical and unwarranted intrusion in their privacy, arising from spam mail to persons who do not want them.

It is unfortunate that an absurd situation has been created borrowing email addresses from other groups and "membership list is being continuously churned from various Yahoo RTI groups".

Perpetrator of this unethical practice are requested to kindly seek legal advise and confine their enthusiasm to legal activities.

Dhirendra Krishna
Owner and moderator
yahoo groups rti4ngo and rti4empowerment.
.........................................................................................................................................

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Harsh <manderharsh@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks. I am not sure this helped. Because all except NCPRI replied `unable to process your message'. I hope it works. There has to be some way to not be forced to receive this flood of unwanted mail interchange.
Regards,
Harsh Mander

From: humjanenge@googlegroups.com [mailto:humjanenge@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of PMK1504
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2010 2:00 PM

To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Indian Institutions need brand building

Dear Mander (and any other dissatisfied member)

This group has not appointed any moderators as yet to individually service "unsubscribe" requests like yours.

The list owner and other members have repeatedly posted messages describing how to unsubscribe oneself. As this membership list is being continuously churned from various Yahoo RTI groups it is probable that you are being unsubscribed and resubscribed here.

To unsubscribe permanently from this group, you must first unsubscribe yourself from ALL the following RTI egroups by sending an email to the following IDs and re-confirming it.
The owners/moderators of many of these groups are collaborating to transfer their member lists before Yahoogroups is shut down on 15th January 2011

After unsubscribing send us an email.

PMK

HumJanenge-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.co.in

rti4empowerment-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

rti4ngo-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

rti_india-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

ncprimailinglist-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

ACB_india-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

sartianetwork-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

INDIA_WBA-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Harsh <manderharsh@gmail.com> wrote:
Pl unsubscribe me.

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___


--
Posted By RTI4EMPOWERMENT to - at 11/14/2010 03:38:00 AM

Re: [HumJanenge] Prefer jail to apology, ex-minister tells court

Dear All
I have submitted more than 20 complaints to CJ, but no response.I have
been advised by my senior brothers Advocates and have been told not to
name any High Court/ Supr. Court Judge for contempt. Other HN/SC
Judges will spoil your cases, pending before other Judges, as they
help each others. I am filing a contempt against a High Court Judge
who passed orders with gross illegality, impropriety and irregularity,
when he was District Judge.

In every Contempt proceeding, the name of Contemner is necessary.
However I will not put HC Judge in the arrays of the Contempt case.
If the member of Consumer Commision is an ex HC Judge, you
have to think twice.
Never get impleaded in contempt case of Mr Shanti Bhushan
or Mr Prashant Bhushan( If you are an Advocate then you can take risk,
but my suggestion is that you should keep yourself away ..
If you insist to impleade, Result will be:You will face
Jail Term/ Fine and Mr Prashant Bhushan & Mr. Shant Bhushan will get
away, as they are not likely to be punished by SC for obvious reasons.
.
Even Moily sahab or for that reason even Mahamahim
President of India will not come to rescue of any one.
Dr JN Sharma


On 11/14/10, Victor Cooper <victor99cooper@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Dear Dr. Sharma & other friends:
> 1. Please guide as to what are the remedial options available to a citizen
> if he encounters a corrupt judge? Can he file a contempt petition?
> 2. Please also guide as to what are the options available to a citizen
> where member judges have not been appointed for the past six odd months, and
> the court is non-functional because of lack of quorum.
> 3. Could I also implead myself along with Mr. Bhushan? If so, how should I
> go about it?
> I have written proof of corruption of the then Presiding Member of the State
> Consumer Commission. I complained to CJI (no reply), Mr. Moily who whose
> office forwarded letter to State for dealing with complaint, but no response
> from state.
> Regards,Victor
>
> --- On Sat, 11/13/10, Dipak Shah <djshah1944@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> From: Dipak Shah <djshah1944@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Prefer jail to apology, ex-minister tells court
> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
> Cc: ng.puthoor@gmail.com
> Date: Saturday, November 13, 2010, 10:07 AM
>
> Dearest Dr Sharma Sahebji,
> Let me take to my own case of contempt . It was
> referred to D B of High Court. The advocate argued the matter before lower
> court for contempt on a fake document circulated internally in the
> organisation.!!! See the modus operand of Advocate.
> But when hearing of my case of
> contempt came up ( In my Absence ) Before Judge it was dismissed. Becaus
> they all know my modus operandi fighting for the truth. But in all my cases
> Advocates followed wrong path of subimkteing untruth , Porivisions of law
> not granting stay, wrong arguments, far a way from reality of the cases and
> many thin more. It is always taught during the Procedure code to negate
> first of all allegations . Whether right and . wrong. Repsondent does not
> accept allegation and like. Allege the Plaintiff with all types of
> allegation , malafide intention , abuse of law. and all.
> But I belive that before writing theis negation one should
> see the case fully.
>
> U have written rightly .
> Mr Bhushanji are very well known and before doing any thing one should
> think/ give thought twice , hundred times to do anything against nthem.
> God save us.
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Dr. Jagnarain Sharma <dr.jagnarainsharma@gmail.com>
> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
> Cc: ng.puthoor@gmail.com
> Sent: Sat, 13 November, 2010 3:16:37 AM
> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Prefer jail to apology, ex-minister tells court
>
> Dear Leslie
> You have rightly offered your gratitude to the steps taken by Mr
> Prashant Bhushan and his father, who are fighting corruption in
> Judiciary.
> Be sure, the Judges will think not only twice but ten times
> before sentencing the duo.
> I have made complaint against 3 Judges and contempt proceeding
> suo motto has been moved by the Hon High court and another judge of
> High
> Court has fined Rs 10000/-, on the feed back of his brother
> colleague.
> Also My hats off to them
>
> Jai HO
> Dr JN Sharma
> ADVOCATE/HUMANRIGHT ACTIVIST
>
> On 11/10/10, leslie almeida <leslie_almeida@rediffmail.com> wrote:
>> If someone opens a can or worms, and sticks to his convictions, he prefers
>> to go to jail rather than bow down to corruptions my hats off to him, a
>> true
>> Mahatma Gandhi in the making.
>>
>> Jai HO
>>
>> Leslie Almeida
>>
>>
>> 11 Nov 2010 07:19:10 +0530 wrote
>>>Prefer jail to
>> apology, ex-minister tells court
>>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> SAMANWAYA RAUTRAY
>>
>>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>>
>>
>>
> New Delhi, Nov.
>> 10: Former law minister Shanti Bhushan today told the Supreme Court
>> he would rather "go to jail" for contempt of court than say sorry for
>> his comment on corruption in the judiciary.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>>
>> The statement came
>> at a hearing of a contempt case against his son, activist lawyer
>> Prashant Bhushan, whose sweeping remarks about corruption among judges
>> in a magazine interview had prompted the charge.
>>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>
> "A lot of people
>> believe there is lot of corruption in the judiciary," Bhushan senior,
>> who had impleaded himself in the petition, said. "I would prefer to go
>> to jail than say sorry. I will keep repeating it. There is no question
>> of any apology," he told the bench headed by Justice Altamas Kabir.
>>
>
>>
>>
>>
> Asked to clarify
>> if he was speaking for his son, he said: "I am speaking for both."
>>
>>
>>
>
>>
>>
>> In the interview,
>> Prashant Bhushan had made adverse comments against Chief Justice S.H.
>> Kapadia, then next in line to be the CJI, for
> ignoring potential
>> conflict of interest and awarding mining leases to a company in which
>> he held some shares.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>>
>> On November 6 last
>> year, the court issued contempt notices against the lawyer, who has
>> been spearheading a campaign for making the judiciary more transparent
>> and accountable.
>>
>
>>
>>
>>
> The lawyer, who
> is
>> represented by Ram Jethmalani, chose to stay away from the proceedings.
>> The next hearing is on December 7.
>>
>>
>>
>
>>
>>
>> Earlier, Rajeev
>> Dhavan, lawyer for Tehelka editor Tarun
> Tejpal whose magazine
>> published the lawyer's remarks, angered the court saying there was "no
>> doubt there is corruption in the judiciary".
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>>
>> "Don't make
>> sweeping statements," Justice Kabir snapped.
>>
>
>>
>>
>>
> "I will say it
>> properly if I can," Dhavan retorted.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>>
>> "Propriety demands
>> that you do," the judge said.
>> --
>> When someone shares something of value with you and you benefit
>>
>>
>> from it, you have a moral obligation to
> share it with
>> others.
>>
>> " Vande Matharam "
>>
>> ng.puthoor@gmail.com
>> Gangadharan Nair N.
>>
>>
>>
>> When you realize you've made a mistake, please have the courage
>>
>>
>> to admit it & also take immediate remedial steps to correct
>> it.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>

[HumJanenge] [-] [rti4empowerment] Unsolicited emails from humjanenge@googlegroups.com

 

Friends,

As owner /moderator of yahoo group rti4ngo and rti4empowerment, let me state the factual position:

(A) It is absurd to state that yahoo groups are "collaborating" with google group humjanenge. There is no such collaboration with rti4ngo and rti4empowerment; I do not know about other groups.

(B) It is absurd and totally false to state that yahoo groups are closing on 15 January 2011.

(C) Persons who want to leave humjanenge@googlegroups.com, are not being allowed to do so without leaving their original group. This is an unethical and unwarranted intrusion in their privacy, arising from spam mail to persons who do not want them.

It is unfortunate that an absurd situation has been created borrowing email addresses from other groups and "membership list is being continuously churned from various Yahoo RTI groups".

Perpetrator of this unethical practice are requested to kindly seek legal advise and confine their enthusiasm to legal activities.

Dhirendra Krishna
Owner and moderator
yahoo groups rti4ngo and rti4empowerment.
.........................................................................................................................................

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Harsh <manderharsh@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks. I am not sure this helped. Because all except NCPRI replied `unable to process your message'. I hope it works. There has to be some way to not be forced to receive this flood of unwanted mail interchange.
Regards,
Harsh Mander

From: humjanenge@googlegroups.com [mailto:humjanenge@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of PMK1504
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2010 2:00 PM

To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Indian Institutions need brand building

Dear Mander (and any other dissatisfied member)

This group has not appointed any moderators as yet to individually service "unsubscribe" requests like yours.

The list owner and other members have repeatedly posted messages describing how to unsubscribe oneself. As this membership list is being continuously churned from various Yahoo RTI groups it is probable that you are being unsubscribed and resubscribed here.

To unsubscribe permanently from this group, you must first unsubscribe yourself from ALL the following RTI egroups by sending an email to the following IDs and re-confirming it.
The owners/moderators of many of these groups are collaborating to transfer their member lists before Yahoogroups is shut down on 15th January 2011

After unsubscribing send us an email.

PMK

HumJanenge-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.co.in

rti4empowerment-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

rti4ngo-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

rti_india-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

ncprimailinglist-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

ACB_india-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

sartianetwork-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

INDIA_WBA-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Harsh <manderharsh@gmail.com> wrote:
Pl unsubscribe me.

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___


--
Posted By RTI4EMPOWERMENT to - at 11/14/2010 03:38:00 AM

Re: [HumJanenge] [HumJanenge-YG] KU: Ignorant of rules, PIO returns RTI Application - Early Times - 11 Nov. 2010

Dear All,

Sarabjit  kindly stop figiting be polite and ignore certain things , God has gifted you abudantly. I hold u in high esteem in your wisdom, but sometimes not the language you use. I have something to say to you and to all Children of God. I too have a bad temper but have leared to control it.I had lot of material things, car, land in my village Goa etc the more i had the more the problem, one day i heard a sermon quote what does it profit a man if he gains the whole world and looses his soul" i sold my car, property, and kept bare necessities i got a lot of relief,
although prices of land sky rocketted and i would have been richer, i do not care am contented with the little i have so

·         "Live as if you were to die tomorrow as tomorrow is promised to no one. Learn as if you were to live forever.""You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. The tragedy of life is not that it ends so soon, but that we wait so long to begin it."

·         "We can't change the direction of the wind, but We can adjust my sails to always reach my destination.""Sing like no one's listening, love like you've never been hurt, dance like nobody's watching, and live like its heaven on earth."


L.Almeida

 



On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 08:47:56 +0530 sroy1947 wrote
>Dear WEDS
>
>Thanks for starting off by calling me an ignorant idiot.
>
>Your argument is full of holes (FYI: I have over 30 years of
>litigative experience in SC as a party-in-person and have never lost a
>matter in any judicial forum) but I don't believe that I must educate
>every wandering minstrel who believes he has the right to sing in
>public streets / railway compartments / Haryana Roadways buses.
>
>If you have something worthwhile to say, say it in a paragraph or 2.
>Otherwise don't waste the time of the members here.
>(apologies to PMK, but old moderatorship habits die hard)
>
>Sarbajit
>
>On Nov 14, 5:42 am, DSouza Wilberious Evanglist
><wileva...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>> Dear Sarabjit,
>>
>> I request you to consider this:
>>
>> Ignorantia juris non excusator Ignorantia legis neminem excusat(Latinfor
>> "ignoranceof the lawdoes not excuse" or "ignoranceof the lawexcuses no one")is
>> an universal legal principle/doctrine holding that a person who is unaware of a
>> law may not escape liabilityfor violating that law merely because he or she was
>> unaware of its content. However, Ignorentia facti, excusat meaning, ignorance of
>> fact is excusable in jurisprudence.
>>
>> In a Democracy as Government is by A people; for the people & of the people; the
>> right to information is inherent right of a people in a democracy inasmuch as
>> the accountability of the government to the governed.
>>
>> This has been reiterated by the Supreme Court of India in its decision in
>> Peoples Union for Civil Liberties % Raj Narain Vs State of U.P. that RTI is a
>> fundamental right, a facet of Art. 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.
>>
>> This is a judgment law. (Art. 141, 142(1&2) of the Constitution of India) & is
>> applicable & enforceable throughout the territory of India.
>>
>> By Art. 142 (2), The Supreme Court of India is empowered to try contempt of
>> itself.
>>
>> To access, seek, receive & impart information is a Human Right (HR), as per
>> Article 19 of The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)
>> that was adopted by the General Assembly of The United Nations on the 16th
>> December 1966, as cardinal principles of Human Right, embodied in The Protection
>> of Human Rights Act 1993 section 2(d) & (f) forming a facet of Art. 21 Part III,
>> Fundamental Right (FR). i.e. Right to life & Liberty, of the Constitution of
>> India. Denial of Information sought by an applicant, by a public authority
>> (PA)/public servant (PS) is violation of HR of that citizen & that citizen can
>> also file a complaint against that public authority (PA)/public servant (PS)
>> with the National Human Rights Commission under The Protection of Human Rights
>> Act 1993.
>>
>>
>> The right to information is enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human
>> Rights and finds international legal protection in Article 19 of the
>> International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which states that
>> 'Everyone shall have the right…to seek, receive and impart information and ideas
>> of all kinds, regardless of frontiers'. The right to access information is not
>> merely important as an aspect of freedom of expression. It is also a practical
>> tool for bringing about the full realisation of all other human rights.
>>
>> ByArt. 144 of The Constitution of India, All authorities, civil & judicial, in
>> the territory of India, shall act in aid of the Supreme Court.
>>
>>
>> Supreme Court of India accepts, cash, IPO, DD & MO as application fee. Read Art.
>> 144 above
>> Art. 12of the Constitution of India defines state as "In this Part, (Part III
>> Fundamental Rights) unless the context otherwise requires, "the State'' includes
>> the Government and Parliament of India and the Government and the Legislature of
>> each of the States and all local or their authorities within the territory of
>> India or under the control of the Government of India. Every Public Authority is
>> the state within the meaning of this article.
>>
>> Art. 13(2)of the Constitution of India prohibits that "The State shall not make
>> any law which takes away or abridges the rights conferred by this Part (Part III
>> Fundamental Rights) and any law made in contravention of this clause shall, to
>> the extent of the contravention, be void.
>>
>> Art. 13(3) In this article, unless the context otherwise requires,— (a) "law"
>> includes any ordinance, order, bye-law, rule, regulation, notification, custom
>> or usage having in the territory of India the force of law; (b) "laws in force"
>> includes laws passed or made by a Legislature or other competent authority in
>> the territory of India before the commencement of this Constitution and not
>> previously repealed, notwithstanding that any such law or any part thereof may
>> not be then in operation either at all or in particular areas.
>>
>>
>> RTI Act 2005, passed by Parliament of India does not restrict the mode of
>> payment of application fee.
>>
>> RTI Act 2005 by its section 22 & 23 provides the Act overiding effect &
>> prohibits any court from adjudicating upon any order under this Act. Does it not
>> evidence that Parliament has curtailed the powers of vested with courts under
>> Art 32 & 226 of the Constitution of India by the constituent power of parliament
>> vested with it under Art. 368 of the Constitution?
>>
>> Further, section 8(j) at the end clarifies, Provided that the information which
>> cannot be denied to the Parliament or a State Legislature shall not be denied to
>> any person.. Any Act or law as it is defined in Art. 13(2),(3)(a & b) of the
>> Constitution of India, by any Government which is repugnant to any article of
>> The Constitution of India is void to the extent of repugnancy.
>>
>> High Court & Supreme Corts are part of State as defined in Art 12 of the
>> Constitution of India. While they have powers to make rules for internal
>> administration but, cannot act in inconsistent with the provisions of an Act
>> passed by parliament about a fundamental right. Power of parliament
>> superintendents over Courts too. Even in all decisions Courts/judges have to
>> uphold the Constitution & adhere to Acts passed by Parliament & not behave in a
>> whimsical manner repugnant to the constitution of India or Acts passed by
>> Parliament. Former CJI KGBs decision in Kannapuram Gandaiah vs. CAO of High
>> Court of Hyderabad is one that is repugnant too.
>>
>> Regards,
>> WEDS
>

RE: [HumJanenge] Indian Institutions need brand building

Thanks. I am not sure this helped. Because all except NCPRI replied ‘unable to process your message’.  I hope it works. There has to be some way to not be forced to receive this flood of unwanted mail interchange.

Regards,

Harsh Mander

 

From: humjanenge@googlegroups.com [mailto:humjanenge@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of PMK1504
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2010 2:00 PM
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Indian Institutions need brand building

 

Dear Mander (and any other dissatisfied member)

This group has not appointed any moderators as yet to individually service "unsubscribe" requests like yours.

The list owner and other members  have repeatedly posted messages describing how to unsubscribe oneself. As this membership list is being continuously churned from various Yahoo RTI groups it is probable that you are being unsubscribed and resubscribed here.

To unsubscribe permanently from this group, you must first unsubscribe yourself from ALL the following RTI egroups by sending an email to the following IDs and re-confirming it.
The owners/moderators of many of these groups are collaborating to transfer their member lists before Yahoogroups is shut down on 15th January 2011

After unsubscribing send us an email.

PMK

HumJanenge-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.co.in

rti4empowerment-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

rti4ngo-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

rti_india-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

ncprimailinglist-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

ACB_india-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

sartianetwork-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

INDIA_WBA-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Harsh <manderharsh@gmail.com> wrote:

Pl unsubscribe me.

Harsh Mander

 

Re: [HumJanenge] Indian Institutions need brand building

Dear Mander (and any other dissatisfied member)

This group has not appointed any moderators as yet to individually service "unsubscribe" requests like yours.

The list owner and other members  have repeatedly posted messages describing how to unsubscribe oneself. As this membership list is being continuously churned from various Yahoo RTI groups it is probable that you are being unsubscribed and resubscribed here.

To unsubscribe permanently from this group, you must first unsubscribe yourself from ALL the following RTI egroups by sending an email to the following IDs and re-confirming it.
The owners/moderators of many of these groups are collaborating to transfer their member lists before Yahoogroups is shut down on 15th January 2011

After unsubscribing send us an email.

PMK

HumJanenge-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.co.in

rti4empowerment-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

rti4ngo-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

rti_india-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

ncprimailinglist-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

ACB_india-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

sartianetwork-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

INDIA_WBA-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com


On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Harsh <manderharsh@gmail.com> wrote:

Pl unsubscribe me.

Harsh Mander