Sunday, October 9, 2016

Re: [IAC#RG] What gives us the right to criticize when we have not done enough ?

The fact that Gandhi did not support Nehru in the end is evident from the fact that he stayed away from the 15th August ceremony in Delhi.

As far as the Constitution is concerned, there is ample scope of changing it for the better, wthout bloodshed.

Regards,

Amit




From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net <indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net> on behalf of Ravindran P M <raviforjustice@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 2:04 AM
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] What gives us the right to criticize when we have not done enough ?
 
Dear friends

Actually brought up on the 'Mahatma' diet of Gandhi one is really confused about the insinuations trickling in from different sources. But my own appreciation of Gandhi took a beating at the realisation of how he trusted and favoured Nehru, the one man who caused the freedom struggle that led to 15 Aug 1947 a waste for its masses! When Dr Ambedkar, the much touted father of our constitution, had himself declared that he would not have accepted this constitution had it been left to him, need one say more about the treachery of those who got to guide the destiny of this nation then? Aren't we in a no win situation without a fresh freedom struggle which could be very much brutal?

regards n bw

ravi

On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:41 PM, amit mukherjee <amitmuk@hotmail.com> wrote:

Dear Mr. Sarabjit Roy,

You are right. I am Dr. Amit Mukherjee of Jharkhand. Since you asked for my credentials, I am giving it.

I am shocked at your perception of others who may not share the same ideals as you do.

I would like to say that I am an Orthopedic Surgeon, who now works free of cost in a remote Hospital in Jharkhand for the villagers who cannot pay and the contract workers of the small scale industries..

I am a staunch Hindu and can say with authority that IofC has till date NOT converted even a single person to Christianity or whatever! I am associated with this idea for 40 years!

The central philosophy of this idea is that much needs to be changed in the World, but that change HAS to begin with myself. I cannot imagine such a logical idea being termed as a ploy to convert or otherwise, that also funded by..........?

I have been working most of my life in the villages of Jharkhand, especially for the ethnic realization of our tribals, apart from giving them hope to earn dignified livelihoods.

There is much more, but suffice to say that I would not involve myself in anything that I thought would compromise my country`s good.

Now, may I know, what drives you to make such undignified accusations, please???

Amit





From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net <indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net> on behalf of Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 1, 2016 8:19 AM
To: indiaresists
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Why does Modi idolise foreign converted rascals like Gandhi ?
 
Dear Dr. Mukherjee,

I think it would be best if you got answers to your questions directly from the horse's mouth. And, I am prepared to give them.

But first, I would request you to address your bonafides to question me on this particular issue, since.

1) I rather suspect that you are the Dr. Amit Mukherjee from Jharkhand closely associated with 'Caux Initiatives of Change International', the successor of the Moral Re-Armament movement with which the Gandhi (MK) family is closely tied into.

2) It is very well known that the CAUX Intl / MRA is nothing but a massively foreign financed (mainly through dummy Swiss corporations) Christian evangelical/ missionary organisation which is doing its best to convert India's Dalits to Christ. Jharkhand, of course, is a prime hunting ground for them.

3) Gandhi's grandson Rajmohan Gandhi was for many years the prime organiser of this rascally missionary organisation in India, and thus it is no coincidence that he is a leading light in the Aam Aadmi Party which is filled to the gunnels with such massively foreign financed rascals who are part-time-Naxalites and full-time Christian missionaries.

FYI, each and every statement I have made about Shri Gandhii is well documented from multiple independent sources unconnected to me.

respectfully,

Sarbajit Roy

On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 1:08 PM, amit mukherjee <amitmuk@hotmail.com> wrote:

Is this Sarabjit Roy mad????

What is he saying?

What is his contribution to the making of this Nation, apart from spewing idiotic messages like this?

Amit




From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net <indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net> on behalf of Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 1, 2016 6:50 AM
To: indiaresists
Subject: [IAC#RG] Why does Modi idolise foreign converted rascals like Gandhi ?
 
Tommorrow 2 Oct is a day on which another national farce will be enacted for the umpteenth time.

Mr. Modi at 11:30 AM will inaugurate a certain Pravasi Bharatiya Bhawan building in Chanakyapuri, New Delhi, a short distance away from another nest of foreign influenced vipers on prime land 'gifted' to them by the Indian State.

Since the theme for Mr. Modi this time is 'Gandhi the Pravasi', it falls upon IAC to critically examine the role of this so-called father of the nation touching on the following points by recalling.

1) That this Gandhi the Pravasi was a paid British agent provocateur imported from abroad to undermine and scuttle the revolutionary Indian freedom movement,

2) That this Gandhi the Pravasi was in a notorious homoerotic relationship in South Africa which rendered him pliable for his imperialist paymasters,

3) That this Gandhi the Pravasi was a collaborator raising troops for the British from among the Indian people,


4) That Gandhi the Pravasi publicly and repeatedly declared his resolve for unconditional support to the British Empire,

5) That for his treachery the Pravasi Gandhi was awarded the Kaiser-e-Hind medal by the British among other substantial payments,

6) That Gandhi Pravasi was an incestuous paedophile and raving sex maniac,

7) That Gandhi the 'peacenik' was responsible for the execution of Bhagat Singh by his coded letter of March 23 1931 to the Viceroy and so that the nation could be ultimately divided.

If this is the sort of person the Prime Minister of India deems fit to idolise and raise monuments to, then India Against Corruption must seriously question is there is any difference between the Congress and the RSS.

Every statement Mr. Modi utters tomorrow in praise of this Pravasi rascal will be an insult to the pantheon of real Hindustani martyrs who laid down their lives so that a free India can be achieved (and which free India is still to come).

Sarbajit

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



--

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.