Wednesday, January 23, 2013

[HumJanenge] Writ Petition filed in Odisha High Court for removal of Sri Jagadanand, Odisha Information Commissioner

 

Writ Petition filed in Odisha High Court for removal  of Sri Jagadanand   from the post of Odisha Information Commissioner

Dear   friends

On 22.1.13,  Sri Biswa Keshari Mohanty, Chandbali  of Bhadrak district, Odisha  has  filed  a writ  petition in Odisha High Court   challenging  the failure of Mr. Jagadanand,   Odisha Information Commissioner    in redressing his Complaint against the concerned public authority as per provision of RTI Act  and Governor, Odisha  in enquiring into and taking appropriate action on his Complaint against the  Orissa Information Commissioner. The Opposite Parties in this case are Secretary, Dept. of Information and Public Relations, Govt. of Odisha, Secretary, office of Governor, Odisha, Secretary, office of Odisha Information Commission, Sri Jagadanand, State Information Commissioner, Medical officer, Chandabali Community Health Centre, PIO, office of CHC, Chandabali etc.

 

On 22.3.2010, Sri Mohanty had submitted RTI Application to the PIO, office of CHC, Chandabali, Balasore district seeking information about details on the number of staff, their salary, vacancy position along with other queries.  After receiving the application, the concerned PIO by his letter no. 193 dated 31.3.2010 asked him to go through the desired documents on 13 th April, 2010 at 11 a.m. onwards in the office.   Accordingly, Sri Mohanty went to the office   and searched for the PIO. Being failed to trace him out, he met the  Medical officer and requested  to allow him to go through the information. His request was turned down by Medical Officer.    Then he made first appeal  to the FAA  and finding no response,  second appeal was lodged  in the office of the Information Commission.

 

 The case was registered as Complaint Case No.2935/10. Sri Jagadanand took hearing of the case. However during the course of  hearing,  the PIO  submitted  that since the applicant had inspected the relevant records , the information on the matter cannot be furnished .  Having heard both parties,  Sri Jagadanand  directed the PIO to ensure furnishing a full set of information expeditiously free of cost to the Petitioner within 10 days of receipt of the order and report compliance thereof. He further  issued show cause notice to the PIO directing to appear along with a detail show cause memorandum and to explain as to why penalty under section 20(1) shall not be imposed.  

 

 After receiving the order,  the PIO supplied the information to the  Complainant  and the case was again heard by the  Commission  on 16.4.2012 . During hearing it was  observed that first appeal preferred by the  complainant  has neither been dealt nor disposed of by the first appellate authority so he directed the first appellate authority to explain as to why disciplinary action shall not be recommended against him for inaction and dereliction of duties . The  Commission  also issued show cause notice to Bhagaban Chandra Pati, PHEO-cum-Ex-PIO and Gouranga Chandra Jena, Surgery specialist-cum-First Appellate Authority to appear along with their respective show cause and explain as to why penalty shall not be imposed as per section 20(1) of the Act.   

 

In the next hearing, Bhagaban Chandra Pati filed an affidavit to the extent  that he was never designated as a public information officer at any point of time in the office of  CHC. But the Commission without taking  the  above said facts in to consideration and without applying his judicial mind  by his order dated 23.5.2012 illegally directed the  present medical officer to pay a compensation of Rs 2000/- to the complainant and only cautioned the first appellate authority to be careful and not to repeat this act in future. He further directed the Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Healh & Family welfare Department to release comprehensive guideline to all public authorities  for mandatory public disclosure under provisions of the  Act.   

 Sri Mohanty, the petitioner has submitted  that Sri Jagadanand, SIC without appreciation of the facts as well as provisions of the law illegally disposed of the case and also closed the same without imposing penalty  on erring PIO s and the appellate authority.   He also  submitted a Complaint   to Governor, Odisha  under Section-17 of  RTI Act praying for action against  Sri Jagadanand on account of his  failure to deliver justice to him and penalize the PIOs and the 1st Appellate authority. The Governor remained silence on it.

 

 Sri Mohanty has  prayed to  the Hon'ble High Court  to direct to recover the penalty from the erring officials  and issue a writ in nature of Mandamus or any other suitable writ directing   Governor  to take appropriate legal action against Sri Jagadanand, SIC   as per law and  remove him from his office within a stipulated period.

 

 

Posted  by

Pradip Pradhan

RTI Activist, Odisha

M-99378-43482

Date- 23.1.13

 


No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.