Oh
This seems to be a IAC (Indians Against CJI) initiative to 'phasao' me.
Last time I checked Mr.Kapadia is still in his very palatial and
comfortable house (not that 'aam junta' like you or me would be
allowed inside) and still sits at his seat in Court # 1
For the record: I never said / wrote / published that this SC Judgment
is because CJI S.H.Kapadia is either homeless or jobless. Seems to me
tho that its the sort of thing Arvind may say.
Sarbajit
On 9/15/12, Murali Krishnan <
rti4citizens@gmail.com> wrote:
> *Dear Friends *
> *
> *
> *Do you know that this judgment is only because ex-CJI Kapadia is homeless
> and without a job.*
> *
> *
> *Please support circulate this bold initiative from Dr. Sarbjit Roy to stop
> CORRUPT JUDICIARY from Swallowing AUTONOMOUS RTI Instititions like CIC.**
> *
> * *
> *
> *
> *---------- Forwarded message ----------**
> **From: **Sarbajit Roy** **<
sroy.mb@gmail.com>**
> **Date: Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 10:49 AM**
> **Subject: [HumJanenge] PUBLIC GRIEVANCE: Constitution of Benches**
> **To: "s.mishra" <
s.mishra@nic.in>, satyananda mishra <
>
satyanandamishra@hotmail.com>**
> **
> **
> **To:**
> ** Shri Satyananada Mishra ji**
> ** Chief Information Commissioner of India**
> ** Central Information Commission**
> ** August Kranti Bhawan**
> ** New Delhi**
> ** **
> ** BY EMAIL**
> ** **
> ** 15-Sep-2012**
> ** **
> ** PUBLIC GRIEVANCE / NOTICE-IN-LAW**
> ** **
> ** Sir**
> ** **
> ** I refer to**
> ** **
> ** a) Recent decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in "Namit Sharma versus**
> ** UoI" in WPC(C) 210 of 2012 d/d 13.09.2012.**
> ** **
> ** b) Full Bench Decision of Central Information Commission in Appeal no.**
> ** CIC/MA/A/2008/01085 d/d on 30.10.2009 with particular reference to my**
> ** submission on behalf of Tattwasoochna Sabha recorded at para 32**
> ** therein questioning (incomplete) constitution of the Full Bench.**
> ** **
> ** In the circumstances, and seeing as how Mr. Vijai Sharma is now the**
> ** only member (as far as I can see) in the Central Information**
> ** Commission qualified as "law member", I am aggrieved that the Hon'ble**
> ** Commission has consistently ignored all my submissions, pleas and**
> ** entreaties concerning this issue, and I hereby call on you to ensure**
> ** that henceforth the Central Information Commission must function in a**
> ** "collegium" at its Full Strength and hear and decide all cases "as a**
> ** body" with Mr Vijai Sharma always present and having a quorum of at**
> ** least 2 members.**
> ** **
> *
> * I may remind you that it was in one of my cases cited as WP(C)*
> *
> ** 12714/2009 in Delhi High Court that the CIC Management Regulations**
> ** 2007 regulating "Benches" was struck down as bad in law. The stay**
> ** order obtained in SLP 30152 thereafter allowing single IC benches**
> ** pende lite now seems modified by the latest judgment of Supreme Court.**
> ** It is pertinent that I am a party before the Supreme Court in that**
> ** matter (SLP 30152) which is now converted into regular civil appeal.**
> ** **
> ** Any alternative would be construed as "civil contempt of court" and I**
> ** would have no hesitation in initiating the requisite IA should I**
> ** decide to enter appearance as I have been called upon to do recently.**
> ** The responsibility to manage the affairs of the Commission vests in**
> ** you, hence this email.**
> ** **
> ** I would appreciate your acknowledgment.**
> ** **
> ** yours faithfully**
> ** **
> ** Er. Sarbajit Roy**
> ** B-59 Defence Colony**
> ** New Delhi 110024*
>
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.