Sunday, November 20, 2011

Re: [HumJanenge] Re: help regarding writ against orders of the CIC

The order you have attached is DIFFERENT from the one I sent.

IC(SS) has taken the correct action.

Since a First Appeal had already been filed and no decision received, the proper course would have been to file 2ND APPEAL. The CIC has weak jurisdiction to tackle complaints u/s 18  against FAA for not delivering decisions.

Sarbajit

On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:15 AM, sandeep kumar <drsandgupta@gmail.com> wrote:
sir,
thanks a lot for your critical observations. The fact is that other
ICs are not emulating this order. Only SM is passing this type of
orders. SS/SG/DS/AD have assigned duties to their office staff to copy
paste the orders on the complaints filed. Please see the enclosed
order.
regards
sandeep


On 11/20/11, sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Sandeep
>
> http://rti.india.gov.in/cic_decisions/CIC_SM_C_2011_001237_M_69735.pdf
>
> This is  perfectly good order from CIC(SM) and should be emulated by
> all other ICs. I don't know why you are upset about it <smile>
>
> Sarbajit
>
> On Nov 20, 6:57 am, sandeep kumar <drsandgu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> sir,
>> I want notice to be issued to PIO for not replying  and to ensure the
>> rights of the complainants. as first appeal was already filed, the
>> commissioner (in my opinion) erred in ordering the
>> complainant/appellant to file first appeal again in response to PIO 's
>> order (if any). Why should the complainant/appellant send second
>> appeal again?
>> regards
>>
>> On 11/19/11, Sarbajit Roy <sroy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > Dear Sandeep
>>
>> > What do you want ?
>>
>> > 1) Information
>> > 2) Penalty against PIO
>> > 3) To ensure primacy of section 18 over 19 using Writ process
>> > 4) All of the above
>>
>> > If your answer is 4, I suggest you review your assumptions.
>>
>> > Sarbajit
>>
>> > On 11/19/11, sandeep kumar <drsandgu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Dear All,
>> >> I wish to file a writ petition in Punjab and Haryana high court
>> >> against a decision in my case in which instead of deciding the
>> >> complaint (against no response by PIO), the CIC directed the PIO to
>> >> respond to the application (without issuing of penalty notice) with
>> >> intimation of details of FAA,. The complainant was asked to file first
>> >> appeal against the order of the PIO if not satisfied. The complainant
>> >> was asked to file second appeal again if aggrieved by orders of FAA.
>> >> This is a violation of section 18 of the RTI act.
>> >> I wish that the members of the group may provide legal grounds for
>> >> filing this writ.
>>
>> >> --
>> >> Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
>> >> 989, Sector 15-A, Opposite bishnoi Colony, Hisar-125001, INDIA
>> >> Phone: 91-99929-31181
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
>> 989, Sector 15-A, Opposite bishnoi Colony, Hisar-125001, INDIA
>> Phone: 91-99929-31181
>


--
Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
989, Sector 15-A, Opposite bishnoi Colony, Hisar-125001, INDIA
Phone: 91-99929-31181

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.