Monday, July 25, 2011

[HumJanenge] Re: Report insults to the National Anthem

1) If 2 PSUs come together to create a JV, the child PSU (even if 100%
owned by these PSUs) is not a PA in terms of definition of PA in RTI
ACT UNLESS there is an order / notfn etc. of APPROPRIATE GOVT
establishing / constituting this entity.

2) There is something fishy about Mr Kaushis's friend's case. It must
have taken considerable effort for his friend to run up so many unpaid
dues while "waiting" for statutory notices to be served on him. What
was he doing all this time ??

Sarbajit

On Jul 26, 10:11 am, Manoj Pai <manoj...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Three Banks that are defined as PA are listed as shareholders of ARCIL.
>
> http://203.115.117.202/Arcil1/about_us/about_us_inside/about_us_insid...
>
> The total shares of these PA ie SBI, IDBI, PNB barely 49.14%. I am not aware of the rest of the shareholders are PA and hence the possibility of ARCIL not being a PA cannot be ruled out.
>
> Do your math before you file an RTI with them. Of course, you are always free to file an RTI with the above three PA in addition to RBI. It would be a good exercise for the list members and examine how ARCIL tries to wriggle out. Something this list has not done for long.
>
> Manoj
>
>  
>
> --- On Tue, 7/26/11, Ashish Kaushik <ashish05...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Ashish Kaushik <ashish05...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Report insults to the National Anthem
> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
> Date: Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 10:12 AM
>
> In this case can RTI be filed with ARCIL, in its website ARCIL seems to be funded by SBI and IDBI which in turn are funded by Govt of India.
>
> regards
>
> Ashish
>
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:49 PM, Abhijit Mehta <abhijitvme...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Yes private banks are not under RTI, however if you complain to RBI and then file a RTI on your complain then may get some justice.
> It's not much but it's something.
>
> Sent from my iPad
> On 25-Jul-2011, at 11:47 AM, "Jitendra P. Shah" <jpsha...@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
>
> RTI is not applicable to private banks.
>  
>  
> -J. P. SHAH 09924106490 or 0285-2674025http://www.jps50.blogspot.com/
>
>  
>
> From: Ashish Kaushik <ashish05...@gmail.com>
> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
>
> Sent: Sunday, 24 July 2011 8:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Report insults to the National Anthem
>
> Dear Group members,
>
>                                 One of my friend took home loan from
> ICICI which due to poor fortune went into delayed payment. Recently my
> friend received notice from ARCIL ( Assett Re Construction Of INDIA ltd.
>  ). The parent lending ICICI has ignored to serve due notices under
> compliance of securitisation act. Can we ask through RTI act at what
> consideration the loan has been assigned to ARCIL and other appropriate
> remedies to protect house and take moratorium in loan repayment
> schedule. Actual loan amount - Rs 8.03 lacs and repayment amount
> demanded - Rs 11.16 lacs.
>
> best regards
>
> Ashish
>
> --
> best regards
>
> Ashish Kaushik
> "winning is not everything...... it's the only thing."

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.