Saturday, January 8, 2011

Re: 04 - RE: [HumJanenge] public prosecutor, magistrate, high court judges, supreme court judges

My experiences with the judiciary and quasi judicial organisations also confirm Mr Shah's views.
 
regards n bw
 
ravi

On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Dipak Shah <djshah1944@yahoo.com> wrote:
Even if you narrate the process/ behavioral aspect of a Judge during the case in ur petition or submission a contermpt will be raised.
         This is my personal observation. To lie down the person to process any further.  Not only this but but also many times bad remarks are passed . I had once observed that petition was on board. Without serving any notice to other party my case was dismissed . When I saw the Judgment it was containing 4 pages. In another case it was dismissed and Judgment pages were 4 pages and irrelevant to the case!!!!
                   Even one PIL was dismissed. But the other Judge Issued order to DCP Traffic to give an affidavit to my petition. Other Judge without taking on record Affidavit in reply " Dismissed" and judgment was containing some clarification by Chief Justice  at his own !!!!!
                 This case was for Public Interest at large for towing the vehicles by Police. This is totally illegal under the Motor Vehicle Act. You go through the Provisions under Motor Vehicle Act . Such behavioral is against Public at large.!!!!!!???
God save us.
Shah D J

--- On Fri, 7/1/11, shak her <shake_lak2001@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: shak her <shake_lak2001@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: 04 - RE: [HumJanenge] public prosecutor, magistrate, high court judges, supreme court judges
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Date: Friday, 7 January, 2011, 6:44 AM


Dear Sir,
 
How abt Lawyers and the Bar Council in which categeroy they i;e . Public Servant, Professinals like Dr. or Auditor or Bussiness pll...?
 
B'cous if a Dr or any other persons behave impproperly before the Judge or Court they will at once will be punished as a Contempt of Law...
 
Please explain these differences...
 
Thanks
 
Shak

--- On Thu, 6/1/11, Justice Kamleshwar Nath <justicekn@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Justice Kamleshwar Nath <justicekn@gmail.com>
Subject: 04 - RE: [HumJanenge] public prosecutor, magistrate, high court judges, supreme court judges
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Date: Thursday, 6 January, 2011, 2:25 PM

ADVISORY: There is currently a display bug in Yahoo! Mail that effects forwarded messages, causing such messages to be improperly displayed. Yahoo! is working on a fix. In the mean time, you can switch to Yahoo! Mail Classic (see "Options" menu at top right, choose "Mail Clasic...") to see these messages properly. We apologize for the inconvenience.
Waitlist reason: humjanenge@googlegroups.com is not on your Guest List | Approve sender | Approve domain | Boxbe



No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.